| Literature DB >> 35620106 |
Hulin Qiu1, Fengfei Shen1, Aiguo Yin1,2, Jiaxian Liu1, Biyu Wu1, Ying Li1, Yunyi Xiao1, Jinping Hai1, Bo Xu1,2.
Abstract
This study aimed to decolorize azo dyes in high-salt industrial wastewater under high-salt and low oxygen conditions using extreme halophilic/halotolerant bacteria screened from the salt fields of Tibet, which consisted of Enterococcus, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, and Kosakonia. Under the optimal conditions, 600 mg/l Congo red, Direct Black G (DBG), Amaranth, methyl red, and methyl orange could be completely decolorized in 24, 8, 8, 12, and 12 h, respectively. When the DBG concentration was 600 mg/l, NADH-DCIP, laccase, and azo reductase were confirmed to be the primary reductase and oxidase during the degradation process, and the degradation pathways were verified. The microflora could not only tolerate changes in salt concentrations of 0-80 g/l, but also displayed strong degradative ability. Under high-salt concentrations (≥ 60 g/l NaCl), NADH-DCIP reductase was primarily used to decolorize the azo dye. However, under low salt concentrations (≤ 40 g/l NaCl), azo reductase began to function, and manganese peroxidase and lignin peroxidase could cooperate to participate in DBG degradation. Additionally, the halophilic/halophilic microflora was shown to convert the toxic DBG dye to metabolites of low toxicity based on phytotoxicity analysis, and a new mechanism for the microflora to degrade DBG was proposed based on intermediates identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This study revealed that the halophilic/halophilic microflora has effective ecological and industrial value for treating wastewater from the textile industry.Entities:
Keywords: azo dyes; biodegradation; decolorization; detoxification; halophilic/halotolerant microflora
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620106 PMCID: PMC9127808 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.877151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Characteristics of the main azo dyes used in this study.
| Azo dyes | Molecular structures | Wavelength (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Black G |
| 645 |
| Direct Black 38 |
| 590 |
| Congo Red |
| 493 |
| Methyl Orange |
| 465 |
| Amaranth |
| 522 |
| Methyl red |
| 515 |
Figure 1(A) The distribution of each sample at the genus level. (B) Sample and genus relationship. (C) The abundance changes of different bacteria in each sample at the genus level. The right side of the figure shows the value represented by the color gradient.
The ability of extreme halophilic/halotolerant bacteria to degrade azo dyes with different structures.
| Azo dye | Molecular structure | Liquid medium | 600 mg/l (24 h) Maximum decolorization (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before decolorization | After decolorization | |||
| Congo red |
|
|
| 93.3 |
| Methyl orange |
|
|
| 98.6 |
| Direct Black G (DBG) |
|
|
| 96.1 |
| Methyl red |
|
|
| 98.4 |
| Amaranth |
|
|
| 99.2 |
Figure 2Change in the decolorization efficiency of microflora under different incubation conditions: (A) temperature; (B) salt concentration; (C) initial pH; (D) shaker speed; (E) Direct Black G (DBG) concentration; and (F) different azo dyes. Data points represent the mean of three independent replicates. The standard error of the mean is indicated by error bars.
Enzyme activities in the supernatant and microbial cells before (control) and after decolorization of 600 mg/l DBG.
| Enzyme | Control | 20 g/L NaCl | 40 g/L NaCl | 60 g/L NaCl | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Int | Ext | Int | Ext | Int | Ext | Int | Ext | |
| Azo reductasea | 0.9377 | 0.9683 | 3.0918±0.00437** | 7.1304±0.01162* | 5.7971±0.01162* | 4.6763±0.00394** | 2.7440±0.00843 | 0.5411±0.00422 |
| Lacb | 0.0036 | NA | 0.24691±000411 | 1.04938±0.00254** | 0.2679±0.00263 | 0.74074±0.00183** | 0.53086±0.00263 | 0.58026±0.00105* |
| Lignin peroxidaseb | 0.0014 | NA | 3.51852±0.677* | 0.01624±0.00637** | 0.51852±0.00496 | 0.00487±0.00339* | 1.35802±0.00452 | 0.00803±0.0039** |
| NADH–DCIPb | 5.7713 | 4.7649 | 28. 5965±0.00401** | 5.2339±0.00208** | 33.8596±0.00434** | 3.83041±0.00568** | 40.9942±0.00105** | 7.6318±0.0033** |
| Mn peroxidaseb | 0.0019 | NA | 0.02292±0.00416 | 0.15624±0.0229** | 0.00585±0.00231* | 0.15735±0.2275** | 0.01749±00422** | 0.18409±0.00137** |
Ext, extracellular; Int, intracellular. Values are the mean of three experiments ± standard error mean (SEM), and significance differences from the control are indicated by *(p < 0.01) and **(p < 0.001) based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey–Kramer comparison test. aμM of methyl red reduced min−1 mg of protein−1, benzyme units min−1 mg protein−1.
Figure 3(A) UV–Vis spectrum analysis of 600 mg/l Direct Black G (DBG) medium after decolorization of extremely complex halotolerant/halophilic flora. (B) Fourier infrared spectroscopy analysis of 600 mg/l DBG medium after decolorization of extremely complex halotolerant/halophilic flora. (C) LC–MS analysis of 600 mg/l DBG medium after the decolorization of extremely complex halotolerant/halophilic flora.
Characteristics of the main azo dyes used in this study.
| Serial number | Time (min) | Molecular weight | Precursor ions (m/z-structure) | Molecular formula | Chemical structures | Chemical name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.97 | 189 | 190 | C10H11N3O |
| 2,7,8-Triaminonaphthalen-l-ol |
| 2 | 2.73 | 176 | 179 | C10H18O3 |
| Naphthalene-1,2,4-triol |
| 3 | 1.28 | 110 | 109 | C6H6O2 |
| Catechol |
| 4 | 3.58 | 108 | 109 | C6H9N2 |
|
|
| 5 | 4.08 | 166 | 165 | C8H6O4 |
| Phthalic acid |
| 6 | 3.12 | 132 | 131 | C5H8O4 |
| 4-Hyydroxy-2-oxopentanoic acid |
| 7 | 0.39 | 94 | 95 | C7H6O4 |
| Aniline |
Figure 4Proposed pathway for the degradation of DBG by halophilic/halotolerant bacteria.
Figure 5Representative images from the biological toxicity test with (A) rice, (B) corn, and (C) wheat.
Phytotoxicity of dye DBG (600 mg/l) and its degradation products extracted after degradation (48 h).
| Sample | Rice (cm) | Corn (cm) | Wheat (cm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germination (%) | Shoot | Root | Germination (%) | Shoot | Root | Germination (%) | Shoot | Root | |
| Distilled water | 100 | 5.16 ± 0.38 | 5.76 ± 0.31 | 100 | 6.78 ± 0.56± | 7.63 ± 0.33 | 100 | 5.01 ± 0.48 | 2.77 ± 21 |
| DBG | 56.3 | 0.44 ± 0.27* | 0.18 ± 0.01* | 47.4 | 0.00 | 0.38 ± 0.24* | 42.5 | 0.19 ± 0.35* | 0.33 ± 0.15* |
| Degradation products | 100 | 4.56 ± 029% | 6.33 ± 0.39% | 100 | 6.40 ± 0.45% | 7.37 ± 0.32% | 100 | 4.77 ± 0.37 | 2.64 ± 0.1.5% |
Values are the mean of three experiments ± standard error mean (SEM); data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test using the mean values of germinated seeds of three experiments. Seeds germinated in DBG differed significantly from the seeds germinated in distilled water at *p < 0.01, and the seeds germinated in degradation products differed significantly from the seeds germinated in DBG at %p < 0.5.