Literature DB >> 35619993

Creation of Non-Contact Device for Use in Metastatic Melanoma Margin Identification in ex vivo Mouse Brain.

Matthew Tucker1, Matthew Lacayo2, Suzanna Joseph3, Weston Ross1,2, Pakawat Chongsathidkiet2, Peter Fecci2, Patrick J Codd1,2.   

Abstract

Because contemporary intraoperative tumor detection modalities, such as intraoperative MRI, are not ubiquitously available and can disrupt surgical workflow, there is an imperative for an accessible diagnostic device that can meet the surgeon's needs in identifying tissue types. The objective of this paper is to determine the efficacy of a novel non-contact tumor detection device for metastatic melanoma boundary identification in a tissue-mimicking phantom, evaluate the identification of metastatic melanoma boundaries in ex vivo mouse brain tissue, and find the error associated with identifying this boundary. To validate the spatial and fluorescence resolution of the device, tissue-mimicking phantoms were created with modifiable optical properties. Phantom tissue provided ground truth measurements for fluorophore concentration differences with respect to spatial dimensions. Modeling metastatic disease, ex vivo melanoma brain metastases were evaluated to detect differences in fluorescence between healthy and neoplastic tissue. This analysis includes determining required-to-observe fluorescence differences in tissue. H&E staining confirmed tumor presence in mouse tissue samples. The device detected a difference in normalized average fluorescence intensity in all three phantoms. There were differences in fluorescence with the presence and absence of melanin. The estimated tumor boundary of all tissue phantoms was within 0.30 mm of the ground truth tumor boundary for all boundaries. Likewise, when applied to the melanoma-bearing brains from ex vivo mice, a difference in normalized fluorescence intensity was successfully detected. The potential prediction window for the tumor boundary location is less than 1.5 mm for all ex vivo mouse brain tumors boundaries. We present a non-contact, laser-induced fluorescence device that can identify tumor boundaries based on changes in laser-induced fluorescence emission intensity. The device can identify phantom ground truth tumor boundaries within 0.30 mm using instantaneous rate of change of normalized fluorescence emission intensity and can detect endogenous fluorescence differences in melanoma brain metastases in ex vivo mouse tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain metastasis; Endogenous fluorescence; Melanoma; Tumor boundary detection; Warburg Effect

Year:  2022        PMID: 35619993      PMCID: PMC9131976          DOI: 10.1117/12.2608975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  35 in total

Review 1.  Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  David B Camarillo; Thomas M Krummel; J Kenneth Salisbury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  5-ALA in the management of malignant glioma.

Authors:  Herbert Stepp; Walter Stummer
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Review of Neurosurgical Fluorescence Imaging Methodologies.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Summer Gibbs-Strauss; Pablo A Valdés; Kimberley Samkoe; David W Roberts; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.544

4.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Intraoperative assessment of tumor margins during glioma resection by desorption electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Valentina Pirro; Clint M Alfaro; Alan K Jarmusch; Eyas M Hattab; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  PpIX fluorescence combined with auto-fluorescence is more accurate than PpIX fluorescence alone in fluorescence detection of non-melanoma skin cancer: an intra-patient direct comparison study.

Authors:  Nick van der Beek; Jaap de Leeuw; Claire Demmendal; Peter Bjerring; H A Martino Neumann
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Fluorescence-guided surgery of metastatic brain tumors using fluorescein sodium.

Authors:  Takeshi Okuda; Kazuo Kataoka; Tomonari Yabuuchi; Haruki Yugami; Amami Kato
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 8.  Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation.

Authors:  Matthew G Vander Heiden; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Investigating mitochondrial redox state using NADH and NADPH autofluorescence.

Authors:  Thomas S Blacker; Michael R Duchen
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  Real-time Brain Tumor imaging with endogenous fluorophores: a diagnosis proof-of-concept study on fresh human samples.

Authors:  Fanny Poulon; Johan Pallud; Pascale Varlet; Marc Zanello; Fabrice Chretien; Edouard Dezamis; Georges Abi-Lahoud; François Nataf; Baris Turak; Bertrand Devaux; Darine Abi Haidar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.