Current Strategies for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment via Nano-Delivery Systems: A Review.

Liver cancer remains a global health challenge with a projected incidence of over one million cases by 2025. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common primary liver cancer, accounting for about 90% of all liver cancer cases. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is the internal and external environment for tumor development, which plays an important role in tumorigenesis, immune escape and treatment resistance. Knowing that TME is a unique setting for HCC tumorigenesis, exploration of strategies to modulate TME has attracted increasing attention. Among them, the use of nano-delivery systems to deliver therapeutic agents to regulate TME components has shown great potential. TME-modulating nanoparticles have the advantages of protecting therapeutic agents from degradation, enhancing the ability of targeting HCC and reducing systemic toxicity. In this article, we summarize the TME components associated with HCC, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), extracellular matrix (ECM), endothelial cells and immune cells, discuss their impact on the HCC progression, and highlight recent studies on nano-delivery systems that modulate these components. Finally, we also discuss opportunities and challenges in this field.

Introduction

With the rapid increase in the incidence and mortality of liver cancer, it has become a major public health problem worldwide. It is estimated that more than one million people will suffer from liver cancer annually by 2025.1 Liver cancer is reportedly the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in 2018.2 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancers, accounting for about 90% of all primary liver cancers worldwide.3 The HCC prevalence varies geographically and it is the most common cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. HCC occurs in the setting of chronic liver inflammation and it is significantly associated with chronic viral hepatitis infection (hepatitis B or C), alcohol, or toxins. The inflammatory microenvironment provides a favorable growth environment for the HCC development and promotes the abnormal transformation of normal liver cells, such as hepatocytes, stem cells, immune cells and stellate cells.4,5

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is the internal and external environment for tumor development, which plays an important role in tumorigenesis, immune escape and treatment resistance. TME contributes to tumor evasion of immune recognition in three main ways: (1) allowing cancer cells to proliferate massively by suppressing the immune response of the microenvironment; (2) inducing angiogenesis to promote tumor growth under hypoxic conditions; and (3) promoting immune escape of cancer cells.6 The HCC microenvironment exhibits a stronger immunosuppressive effect compared with other tumors, with almost all cellular subpopulations and numerous regulatory mechanisms contributing to the HCC progression. Therefore, the importance of TME in the HCC treatment has received increasing attention in recent years, which drives TME-based researches.

Nano-delivery systems can deliver various chemotherapeutic drugs, therapeutic genes, and photothermal reagents to tumors, thus effectively reducing drug toxicity and resistance, increasing their solubility and improving the targeting ability of therapeutic agents.7,8 Diverse types of engineered nanoparticles have been developed to deliver therapeutic agents to solid tumors. They can protect therapeutic agents from degradation, and the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect facilitates their preferential accumulation at tumors.9 However, passive targeting based on the EPR effect is inefficient and often leads to unpredictable clinical outcomes.9,10 Therefore, researchers have developed the modified nanoparticles to actively target tumor sites. For example, the nanoparticles modified with folic acid could improve their uptake by tumor cells.11 The modified nanoparticles interacted with TME have exhibited encouraging results in the HCC treatment. They kill tumor cells by specifically identifying HCC cells and targeting the HCC microenvironment to release therapeutic agents.

Given the important role that TME plays in the occurrence and progression of HCC, it is of great significance to regulate TME in the HCC treatment. Nano-delivery systems deliver therapeutic agents to regulate TME is a very effective means in that it can affect the HCC progression by regulating signaling pathways, angiogenesis and immune cells. The purpose of this review is to make a comprehensive summary of researches on nano-delivery systems for modulating the HCC microenvironment, in order to gain a better understanding about the relevant TME components in the HCC progression and how nanoparticles modulate these components.

In this review article, we mainly focus on nanoparticles that modulate the HCC microenvironment. We first describe the TME components of HCC and their impact on HCC progression, then discuss the TME- and immune system-related nanoparticles in the HCC treatment, and finally provide an overview on the remaining challenges.

HCC and TME

The HCC microenvironment is composed of cancer cells and stromal cells, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages and lymphocytes,12–14 each cell type plays its unique function. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides a growth environment for these cells. All these intercellular communications ultimately determine how HCC progress. The components of the HCC microenvironment and their roles are shown below (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The tumor microenvironment components of HCC and their impact on the HCC progression.

Fibroblasts are found in fibrous matrices, where they participate in wound repair, tissue maturation and inflammatory responses.15 In tumor tissues, normal fibroblasts can activate cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and they can also arise from endothelial cells, epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, preadipocytes and bone marrow-derived progenitor cells.16 An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that CAFs are strongly associated with the HCC progression. They not only directly affect HCC cells but interact with other interstitial cells to remold the HCC microenvironment. It was found that CAFs isolated from fresh HCC tumor tissues could induce tumorigenesis and metastasis by promoting the proliferation, self-renewal, migration, invasion and drug resistance of HCC cells.17 ECM regulates the number, morphology, movement and adhesion of cells.18 In physiological conditions, ECM maintains tissue homeostasis, and abnormal ECM is a sign of cancer.19 ECM was observed to increase the hardness of solid tumors in the HCC.20 Endothelial cells interact with pericytes, ECM and basement membrane proteins to maintain their stability and proliferation, playing a vital role in neovascularization.21,22 Studies have shown that tumor-associated endothelial cells have abnormal structures and leaky (porous) cells, which leads to tumor angiogenesis.23,24 Similar to other malignancies, angiogenesis leads to the HCC progression.25

The immune response of TME is an important regulator of progression in many cancers including HCC. Immune cells in the HCC microenvironment include tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), lymphocytes and dendritic cells (DCs).14,26 TAMs are considered to have two types: classically activated macrophages (M1 macrophages) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2 macrophages).27 M1 macrophages work as a soldier of adaptive immunity to eliminate tumor cells, while M2 macrophages promote tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and ECM remodeling by suppressing the adaptive immune system.27–29 Lymphocytes affect hepatocarcinogenesis not only by directly acting on the interaction of the adaptive immune system and cytokines but by regulating the innate immune response and angiogenesis.26 DCs are the strongest antigen-presenting cells (APCs) found so far. They control the subsequent differentiation of T cells and regulate their response.30

Given the importance of TME components in the HCC initiation, progression, invasion and metastasis, increased numbers of studies have focused on modulating TME by using nano-delivery systems in the HCC treatment. Therefore, relevant studies on CAF-, ECM-, endothelial cell-, immune system-modulating nanoparticles will be presented below (Table 1).

Table 1

The Nanoparticles that Modulate TME and Immune System of HCC

Type	Therapeutic Agents	Nanoparticles	Major Effects	Ref.
TME-related nanoparticles
CAF	sTRAIL plasmid	Lipid-coated protamine DNA complexes	Cause apoptosis of tumor cells near CAFs; restore the CAFs to a quiescent state	[38]
	ZnF16Pc	Ferritin nanocages	Eliminate CAFs	[45]
	Albumin-paclitaxel complexes	CAP-modified thermosensitive liposomes	Responsive to the FAP-α on CAFs	[46]
	Mycophenolate mofetil linoleic acid	DSPE-PEG2000 nanoparticles	Reduce CAFs density	[47]
ECM	-	Gold nanoparticles	Weaken the focal adhesion connecting the cytoskeleton to the ECM	[59]
	Retinoic acid and doxorubicin	Chondroitin sulfate-modified lipid nanoparticles	Target the Golgi apparatus of HCC; disrupt the Golgi structure and inhibit the production of ECM proteins; disrupt the DNA function, leading to apoptosis of cancer cells or HSCs	[63]
	Doxorubicin	Gelatin nanoparticles	Sensitive to ECM; avoid obstruction of the dense ECM; promote the release of the Dox deep into HCC; improve the efficiency of Dox delivery	[66]
Endothelial cell	VEGF siRNA	PEG-sheddable shell and disulfide-linked PEG-poly(ε-benzyloxycarbonyl-l-lysine) block copolymer nanoparticles	Reduce the protein expression of VEGF mRNA; inhibit the HCC tumor growth	[73]
	VEGF siRNA	CS-SS-9R/BSA-cRGD nanoparticles	Target endothelial cells; reduce the expression of VEGF mRNA; reduce the distribution density of capillaries and anti-angiogenesis	[74]
Immune system-related nanoparticles
TAM	Sorafenib and AMD3100	Lipid-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles	Reduce TAMs infiltration	[86]
	BisCCL2/5i-mRNA	Dlin-MC3-DMA lipid nanoparticles	Inhibit TAMs infiltration; induce polarization of M2 macrophages to M1 subtype	[88]
	Oxygen microcapsules	Polydopamine nanoparticles	Improve hypoxia; enhance the radiotherapy effect; reduce the number of TAMs and convert M2 macrophages to M1 phenotype	[92]
Lymphocyte	Interleukin 12	CD8- and Glypican-3 antibody-modified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles	Simultaneously target CD8+ T cells and HepG-2 cells; activate and proliferate T cells; enhance the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells; promote the cross-linking between T cells and tumor cells	[106]
	Interleukin 12 mRNA	Lipid nanoparticles	Activate Th cells and recruit them to HCC to improve the immune response	[108]
	Interferon-inducible protein-10 plasmid	Folic acid-modified chitosan nanoparticles	Inhibit Tregs expression; promote the secretion of IFN-γ and IP-10	[113]
DC	H22 hepatoma lysate and CpG-ODN	Mannose-modified nanoliposomes	Target DCs; activate and induce DCs maturation; improve immune response	[125]
	RNA	Lipid nanoparticles	Promote DCs maturation; promote the proliferation of CD8+ T cells	[128]

TME-Related Nanoparticles

CAF-Modulating Nanoparticles

Fibroblasts can be activated by a variety of factors during tissue damage, such as growth factors, direct intercellular communication, adhesion molecules in contact with leukocytes, reactive oxygen species,15 and microRNA.31,32 When fibroblasts remain activated after recovery from tissue injury, these activated fibroblasts, also known as the CAFs, may interact with other molecular pathways to promote tumorigenesis. Cytokines may stimulate resident fibroblasts to convert them into CAFs,33 including transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1). In addition, cytokines may convert epithelial or endothelial cells into CAFs, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF), osteocalcin,34 TGF-β, and SDF-1.35,36 CAFs influence the HCC progression through direct or indirect interaction with HCC cells. Furthermore, CAFs promote tumor cells proliferation and the HCC progression by remodeling ECM, inducing angiogenesis, recruiting inflammatory cells, and secreting growth factors and cell inhibitors.37 Current strategies for modulating CAFs include translating CAFs to non-activated state or tumor suppressor phenotype, targeting specific markers of CAFs, and inhibiting the secretion or signaling molecules of CAFs. Due to the limited data about the modulatory effect of nanoparticles on CAFs in the HCC, the following will focus on the current strategies for modulating CAFs in cancer therapy.

Direct elimination of CAFs may disrupt homeostasis and lead to cancer progression. Therefore, putting CAFs into non-activated state or converting them to tumor suppressor phenotype may be a safe and reliable therapeutic approach. It was found in a mouse xenograft model that nanoparticles loaded with plasmids that encode secrete TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (sTRAIL) could cause apoptosis of tumor cells near CAFs.38 Interestingly, it restored the remaining CAFs to a quiescent state, remodeled the TME, and further inhibited tumor growth, which facilitates a second wave of nanotherapeutics.

Another effective therapeutic strategy is to target specific markers on the surface of CAFs, such as α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA),39 fibroblast activating protein (FAP),40 platelet-derived growth factor receptor α/β (PDGFRα/β)41 and collagen.42 Current researches are mainly focused on the highly expressed FAP in CAFs. FAP is a membrane serine peptidase and a member of the type II serine protease family. Its dipeptidase and collagenase activities are believed to be closely associated with ECM remodeling. FAP is almost absent in healthy tissues but highly expressed in CAFs in various cancers.43 The activity of FAP in the HCC is more than tenfold higher than that in the normal liver.40,44 FAP supports tumor growth by promoting proliferation, migration and invasion of tumor cells in multiple ways. Li et al coupled the FAP-specific single-chain viable fragment (scFV) sequence to the ferritin surface and encapsulated the photosensitizer ZnF16Pc in ferritin nanocages to form scFv-Z@FRT, and then use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) increased tumor uptake of the nanoparticles.45 It was observed that scFV-FAP specific interaction promoted nanoparticles accumulation in tumors and the high ZnF16Pc loading worked in conjugation to cause efficient CAFs eradication. CAP is a cleavable amphiphilic peptide specific to FAP-α. Yu et al developed novel dual-responsive nanoparticles by encapsulating paclitaxel-albumin nanoparticles (HSA-PTX) into CAP-modified thermosensitive liposomes (CAP-TSL) and then added photothermal agent IR-780 to form HSA-PTX@CAP-ITSL.46 HSA-PTX@CAP-ITSL first accumulated at the tumor site where it released HSA-PTX via cleavable CAP responsive to FAP-α. After irradiation by NIR laser, it not only killed tumor cells by thermal effect but promoted HSA-PTX release and facilitated deep penetration into tumor tissue. The anti-tumor effect was verified by both in vivo and in vitro experiments. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent in liver transplantation. Yang et al constructed MMF prodrugs (MMF-LA) by chemically derivatizing MMF with linoleic acid (LA) and then developed MMF-LA@DSPE-PEG nanoparticles using DSPE-PEG2000 to encapsulate MMF-LA.47 Immunofluorescence showed that MMF-LA@DSPE-PEG accumulated in the positive area of α-SMA, which proves that MMF-LA@DSPE-PEG had a high CAFs targeting ability. By co-seeding LM3 HCC cells and LX2 cells (an activated human hepatic stellate cell line) on the right side at a ratio of 2:1, they constructed a highly fibrotic HCC model to verify the anti-CAFs efficacy of MMF-LA@DSPE-PEG. The results revealed that MMF-LA@DSPE-PEG significantly reduced the CAFs density of HCC and exhibited an even higher anti-tumor activity.

Targeting CAFs-derived cytokines and chemokines is also a promising therapeutic strategy. TGF-β secreted by CAFs promotes angiogenic mimetic formation, tumor progression and invasion,48–50 which is a potential therapeutic target. Morén et al demonstrated that the liver X receptor alpha (LXRα) agonist T0901317 inhibited the HCC growth by eliminating TGF-β-induced CAFs and the fibroblast phenotype of HCC.51 Several TGF-β inhibitors have been developed. For example, the TGF-β receptor inhibitor LY2109761 was shown to effectively inhibit HCC growth and dissemination by blocking the cross-talk between HCC cells and CAFs.52 Gold nanoparticles were also shown to alter cell morphology, migration and molecular markers by disrupting signaling to CAFs and inhibiting their activation by modulating the TGF-β1 expression level.53 In addition, CAFs-derived secretagogues such as chemokines CCL2/5/7, CXCL16, and IL-6 are potential therapeutic targets for CAFs. However, the nanoparticles targeting these cytokines for the HCC treatment need to be further developed.

ECM-Modulating Nanoparticles

ECM is a complex network of multiple macromolecules surrounding cells, with the main components including collagen, elastin, fibronectin, laminin and proteoglycan.54 Structurally, these components constitute the basement membrane and interstitial matrix of the ECM. Studies have shown that the ECM does not act as mere inert support as previously thought, but is an important component of the cellular environment and involved in almost all cellular behaviors.55 ECM provides an important tissue barrier for tumor metastasis. The development, progression, invasion and metastasis of malignant tumors are often accompanied by changes in the expression of the ECM and its cell surface receptors. The growth and metastasis of HCC lead to the destruction and rearrangement of the original liver tissue, while ECM degradation and remodeling are important factors affecting this process. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are thought to play a key role in ECM degradation and remodeling. The activity of MMPs depends on the balance MMPs and the MMPs inhibitors (TIMPs). The interaction of MMPs and TIMPs maintains the balance of ECM catabolism. In the HCC, this balance is disturbed when MMPs are overexpressed, which disrupts the basement membrane barrier, leading to tumor invasion and metastasis.56 In addition, the stiffness of ECM plays an important role in the HCC development. For instance, lysine oxidase could modulate the stiffness of ECM by promoting covalent cross-linking of collagen fibers and elastin. It is involved in the formation of tumor tissue mesenchyme, which can promote the growth and metastasis of cancer cells.57 It was shown that increased stromal stiffness promoted cancer cells proliferation and chemoresistance, while a soft environment could induce reversible cellular dormancy and stem cell characteristics in the HCC.58

Current researches aim to target various proteins associated with ECM such as collagen, fibronectin and integrin by using novel nano-delivery systems and inhibit HCC proliferation and metastasis by removing these ECM components or altering their interactions with cells. For instance, Ali et al developed Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide-functionalized gold nanoparticles to target integrins.59 The results showed that tumor cells migration was inhibited by targeting integrins which attenuated local adhesion between the cytoskeleton and ECM via integrin linkage. In addition to direct destruction of the ECM components, some researchers have achieved anti-tumor effects by inhibiting ECM production in the HCC. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are major source of ECM, and the Golgi apparatus of HSCs modifies many ECM components into their final secreted forms, including type I and III collagen, proteoglycans, and fibronectin.60,61 In addition, the Golgi apparatus in cancer cells is required for the secretion of many oncogenic proteins such as MMPs.62 In other words, disruption of the Golgi apparatus in HSCs can reduce ECM formation and inhibit tumor progression. Luo et al designed chondroitin sulfate-modified lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) co-loaded with retinoic acid (RA) and doxorubicin (Dox) (Dox-RA-CSNs), knowing that the two agents can form a complex through electrostatic interaction. This is the first published study reporting the use of RA and Dox for the HCC treatment.63 Dox-RA-CSNs were internalized by HCC cells and targeted the Golgi apparatus of HCC. RA disrupted the Golgi structure and inhibited the production of ECM proteins, while Dox disrupted the function of DNA, leading to apoptosis of cancer cells or HSCs (Figure 2). It was shown that Dox-RA-CSNs could significantly increase the intertumoral drug concentration and promote the penetration of Dox and RA into HCC cells. In primary liver tumors or mouse HCC (H22) allogeneic tumor models, Dox-RA-CSNs showed significant anti-tumor activity. The dense ECM and elevated interstitial fluid pressure in TME severely impeded the entry of nanoparticles into the tumors due to the large size of the nanoparticles.64 Therefore, avoiding obstruction of the dense ECM is necessary for drug delivery. Small molecule drugs were found to reach the tumor site more easily, thus facilitating deeper drug penetration to the tumors.65 In other words, an ideal delivery system should be able to accumulate around the tumors through active targeting and EPR effects and convert into free small molecules to facilitate tumor penetration. Based on the above idea, Liu et al combined gelatin nanoparticles (GNPs) and the prodrug doxorubicin-lactose (Dox-Lac) to develop ECM-sensitive programmed nano-delivery systems with “size reduction and hydrophilic/hydrophobic transition” (GNPs-Dox-Lac).66 Lac is widely used as a hepatocyte targeting ligands, which can specifically bind to the over-expressed asialoglycoprotein-1 receptor (asgpr1) on hepatocytes and actively internalize through receptor-mediated endocytosis.67 MMP2 in ECM led to degradation of GNPs, which promotes the release of the prodrug Dox-Lac deep into the HCC solid tumor. Finally, pH-responsive dissociation of Dox-Lac in HCC cells led to the release of free Dox, which translocates to the nucleus to induce toxicity. The ECM-sensitive GNPs-Dox-Lac can improve the efficiency of Dox delivery to achieve a tumor suppression rate of 90.8% in vivo.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of how Dox-RA-CSNs target liver cancer cells via CD44-mediated endocytosis, and then target the Golgi apparatus via interaction with GalNAc-T.

Endothelial Cell-Modulating Nanoparticles

HCC is a kind of tumor with a high degree of vascularization. The abnormal formation of tumor new blood vessels is one of the main reasons for the high metastasis rate and poor prognosis of HCC.68 Blood vessels in the HCC are formed in the following ways: instability of microvascular system leads to high permeability of blood vessels and activation of endothelial cells; activated endothelial cells proliferate and migrate to the spinal cord to form new blood vessels, followed by recruitment of activated pericytes to stabilize new blood vessels.69 The expression and release of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors remain balanced during angiogenesis, whereas HCC breaks this balance, resulting in the abnormal growth of blood vessels. Aberrant activation of endothelial cells is closely associated with HCC angiogenesis. Activation and migration of vascular endothelial cells are promoted by many angiogenic factors in the HCC microenvironment. Among them, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most important signaling molecule during abnormal vascular growth in the HCC.70 Many studies have demonstrated that the high expression of VEGF is related to the HCC progression.

Down-regulating the expression of VEGF mRNA and its protein is a major nano-therapeutic approach against angiogenesis in the HCC. Many studies inhibit VEGF activation by the delivering the small interfering RNA (siRNA) that interferes with VEGF expression to tumor vascular endothelial cells. siRNA can silence the transcriptional translation of specific mRNA and inhibit gene expression,71 but it is easily degraded and engulfed by reticuloendothelial cells during transportation in the body.72 Nano-delivery systems encapsulating siRNA can avoid the above problems. Wang et al developed PEG-polypeptide cationic polymer nanoparticles with peelable PEG shell and disulfide bond-connected PEG-poly(ε-benzyloxycarbonyl-l-lysine) block copolymer (PEG-SS-PLL) to deliver VEGF siRNA (siVEGF) (Figure 3).73 The experiments demonstrated that PEG-SS-PLL can deliver siRNA to HepG-2 cells and reduce the protein expression of VEGF mRNA. A significant inhibitory effect on tumor growth was observed in the HepG-2 BALB/c mouse model. Xu et al developed CS-SS-9R/BSA-cRGD nanoparticles (CBc-NPs) by grafting nona-arginine (9R) to the chitosan (CS) molecule using a disulfide bond (-SS-) to form CS-SS-9R as a core material. And a cyclic peptide RGD sequence (cRGD) was modified to bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the outer shell.74 It was found that CBc-NPs can specifically bind to the αvβ3 integrin receptors overexpressed in tumor endothelial cells and down-regulate VEGF production of tumor endothelial cells in an autocrine manner. The experiments demonstrated that the expression of VEGF mRNA of EA.hy926 cells was reduced to 11% after siVEGF-loaded CBc-NPs (siVEGF-CBc-NPs) treatment and the inhibition rate of EA.hy926 cells proliferation was as high as 90.25%, probably due to the high uptake by EA.hy926 cells. Anti-angiogenesis experiments, including wound healing, cell migration, cell invasion, capillary formation experiments and CD34 immunohistochemical staining, showed that EA.hy926 cells migration was inhibited after siVEGF-CBc-NPs treatment. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that siVEGF could reduce the distribution density of capillaries. Detection of VEGF mRNA expression in tumor tissues revealed that the inhibitory rate of siVEGF-CBc-NPs on VEGF mRNA expression was as high as 95.54%, while naked siVEGF and non-coding siRNA had no gene silencing effect. Anti-tumor studies in vivo proved that the tumor volume and weight of tumor-bearing mice were reduced and the weight was increased after siVEGF-CBc-NPs treatment, suggesting that siVEGF-CBc-NPs could improve the anti-tumor effect and the life quality of tumor-bearing mice.

Figure 3

Illustration of PEG-SS-PLL catiomer for siVEGF encapsulation and intracellular stimulus-responsive siVEGF release.

Immune System-Related Nanoparticles

The immune system has a dual role in the development and progression of HCC. Some immune cells such as T cells and DCs inhibit tumor growth, while others such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) promote tumor progression.

Due to the unique physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles, nanoparticle-based platforms have been widely studied as strategies for regulating the immune system against cancer. In general, nanoparticles can protect sensitive antigens, proteins and RNAs from degradation or inactivation by enzymes in the physiological environment.75 Additionally, the surface of nanoparticles has a strong modification ability to achieve efficient regulation of immune cells. Addition of long-chain polymers can significantly increase the circulatory half-life, and the targeting ability can be enhanced by attaching specific groups such as antibodies, peptides and ligands to the surface.75,76 Immune system-modulating nano-therapy to improve the efficiency of the HCC treatment and increase the immune response ability is a promising approach. In the following section, we will make a summary of studies using nano-delivery systems to modulate HCC immune cells, including TAMs, lymphocytes, and DCs.

TAM-Modulating Nanoparticles

TAMs are one of the most abundant components in the HCC microenvironment. TAMs can be classified into two types according to their functional characteristics: M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages.27 M1/M2 macrophages have two opposite activities. It is generally believed that M1 macrophages are an inhibitory phenotype, which promotes Th1 response to kill tumor cells and microorganisms, while M2 macrophages are an activated phenotype, which activates Th2 response to promote tissue repair, angiogenesis, immunosuppression, and tumor progression.77 Normally, M1/M2 macrophages co-exist in the microenvironment, and they balance each other under normal physiological conditions. When M2 macrophages prevail, it will contribute to tumorigenesis. The high presence of M2 macrophages has been reported to be closely associated with HCC.78 M2 macrophages release IL-6, IL-1 and TNF-α pro-tumor metastasis factors. In the blood of HCC patients, the level of these three cytokines was found to be abnormally elevated.79,80 Moreover, M2 macrophages are associated with HCC blood vessel growth.81 M2 macrophages increased the tumor volume and promoted intrahepatic metastasis by activating the STAT3 signaling pathway in HCC cell lines,82 suggesting that inhibiting the infiltration of TAMs into tumor tissues and M2 polarization may be an effective treatment approach for HCC.

Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that exerts both anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor effects. It is used to treat advanced HCC and significantly prolongs the survival time of patients. However, HCC is resistant to sorafenib, leading to recurrence and metastasis of HCC. CXCR4 is a G protein-coupled receptor whose specific ligand is the chemokine SDF-1. It was found that sorafenib increased the expression of CXCR4/SDF1α in the HCC.83,84 Recent studies have demonstrated that CXCR4 is involved in tumorigenesis and progression by promoting M2 polarization.85 AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist, could avoid cancer cells proliferation and M2 polarization by inhibiting the CXCR4/SDF1α axis.84 Gao et al designed CXCR4-targeted lipid-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles of sorafenib modified with AMD3100 (ADOPSor-NPs) for targeted delivery of sorafenib to HCC.86 The results revealed that ADOPSor-NPs could precisely deliver sorafenib to HCC, block CXCR4/SDF1α and reduce M2 polarization and TAMs infiltration. At the same time, tumor progression was delayed and overall survival was increased in an in situ mouse HCC model. In addition, the team also constructed AMD3100-modified nanoparticles to deliver anti-angiogenic siRNA to HCC (VSAMD-NPs), which together delivered siVEGF and CXCR4 inhibitors to prevent HCC progression and metastasis.87

CCL2 and CCL5 are two chemokines that attract TAMs infiltration and induce their polarization to the M2 phenotype. Wang et al evolved a specific CCL2/CCL5 dual inhibitor (BisCCL2/5i) from a single-domain antibody library on the surface of yeast cells.88 They found that BisCCL2/5i could block both CCL2 and CCL5 signaling pathways and effectively promote macrophages polarization toward the M1 phenotype. As it is risky to use of full-length antibodies due to the complexity and long circulating half-life of post-translational modifications, the researchers used Dlin-MC3-DMA LNPs (MC3 LNPs) to load mRNA encoding BisCCL2/5i (BisCCL2/5i-mRNA-LNPs) (Figure 4). The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the first siRNA drug (ONPATTRO), which relies on MC3 LNPs to deliver siRNA to hepatocytes.89 In other words, MC3 LNPs may possess tumor homing ability to deliver BisCCL2/5i-mRNA to liver malignancies. Experiments have shown that BisCCL2/5i-mRNA-LNPs treatment can not only inhibit TAMs infiltration but induce the polarization of M2 macrophages to M1 subtype. In animal HCC models, BisCCL2/5i-mRNA-LNPs significantly improved the survival of the experimental animals. They also tested the safety of BisCCL2/5i-mRNA-LNPs and found that erythrocytes, white blood cells, body weight, liver function and kidney function were normal in the test group, and no immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) were detected.

Continued.

Dual blockade of CCL2 and CCL5 via LNP-mediated mRNA delivery of BisCCL2/5i polarizes the macrophage M1 phenotype and reduces the immunosuppression in the TME. (A) Schematic of the mRNA-loaded LNPs. (B) In vivo transfection of luciferase mRNA-LNPs after repeated administration (i.v., every 4 days, in total 3 doses). The luciferase was injected intraperitoneally into the mice 6 h post the administration of luciferase mRNA-LNPs, followed by measuring the luciferase bioluminescence signal using IVIS imaging. n=3 biologically independent samples. (C) The quantification of mCherry-positive cells expressed in murine orthotopic HCC tumor tissue 6 h after injection of mCherry mRNA-LNPs (mCherry mRNA: 0.5 mg kg−1). mRNA was mainly expressed in monocytes (CD45+CD11b+) and tumor cells (Hepa1-6-GFP+) (n=8 biologically independent mice per group). (D) BisCCL2/5i expression in different organs 6 h after each administration of BisCCL2/5i mRNA-LNPs (mRNA: 1 mg kg−1, i.v., 3 days apart). n=6 biologically independent samples. The BisCCL2/5i mRNA was mainly expressed in the liver tissue and the repeated administration resulted in comparable protein level. (E, F) mRNA expression of classic M1 (E) and M2 (F) markers in the HCC tumor tissues 48 h after systemic administration of formulated LNPs as a dose corresponding to 1 mg kg−1 mRNA (Mock, HcRed mRNA). Each data point is an individual sample (n=9); one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Change of the immunocellular composition in the HCC TME 48 h following Mock mRNA-LNPs and BisCCL2/5i mRNA-LNPs treatments (mRNA: 1 mg kg−1), measured by flow cytometry (n=4 biologically independent samples; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test; the experiment was conducted three times independently with similar results). (G, H) The percentage and cell counts of macrophages (G) and their M2 subtype (H) in the total immune cells. (J, I) Representative flow dots of M1- and M2-phenotype macrophages (J) and the ratio of M1/M2 (I). Data are represented as the mean ± SD.

Notes: Reproduced from Wang Y, Tiruthani K, Li Set al mRNA Delivery of a Bispecific Single-Domain Antibody to Polarize Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Synergize Immunotherapy against Liver Malignancies. Adv Mater. 2021;33(23):e2007603. Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.88

Abbreviations: LNP, lipid nanoparticle; BisCCL2/5i, specific CCL2/CCL5 dual inhibitor; MΦ, macrophages (CD45+CD11b+CD11c−Ly6C−Ly6G−F4/80+).

Hypoxia is common in the HCC and it can induce the formation of inhibitory immune environments such as the accumulation of TAMs, and promote tumor progression.90,91 Dai et al synthesized polydopamine nanoparticles to stabilize oxygen microcapsules (Oxy-Mic-Poly-Nano) via interfacial polymerization, knowing that oxygen microcapsules are good oxygen carriers that can deliver oxygen to the hypoxic sites of HCC.92 They found that the combination of radiotherapy and Oxy-Mic-Poly-Nano enhanced the radiotherapy effect. In a HCC model established by subcutaneous injection of Hep1–6 cells, the proportion of M1 macrophages in R+O (radiotherapy and Oxy-Mic-Poly-Nano) group was 3.1-fold higher than that in the control group, while the proportion of M2 macrophages was 79.9% lower, demonstrating that radiotherapy combined with Oxy-Mic-Poly-Nano could reduce the number of TAMs in the HCC microenvironment and convert M2 macrophages to the M1 phenotype.

Lymphocyte-Modulating Nanoparticles

Lymphocytes are cells with specific immune recognition functions. According to their origins and immune functions, lymphocytes can be divided into three categories:93 (1) T cells, which participate in cellular immunity by directly killing target cells and by assisting or inhibiting antibody production by B cells; (2) B cells, which participate in humoral immunity by producing and secreting immunoglobulins (antibodies); and (3) natural killer cells (NK cells), which spontaneously exert cytotoxic effects independent of antigenic stimulation and have the effect of killing target cells.

T cells are a key component of the adaptive immune system and make a difference in immune defense against pathogens such as viruses, bacteria and tumors. T cells are divided into three types according to their functions: cytotoxic T cell (CTLs), Tregs and helper T cells (Th cells). CTLs, also known as CD8+ T cells due to the presence of their surface protein CD8, are activated by various cytokines to directly recognize and kill tumor cells through intracellular antigens and are responsible for inhibiting tumor cells proliferation.94,95 CTLs directly kill target cells without causing self-damage via two pathways: the perforin/granzyme pathway and the FAS/FAS ligand (FASL) pathway.96 Tregs regulate the body’s immune tolerance and affect the response of immune cells to self and non-self antigens. In immunotherapy, Tregs participate in tumor progression by suppressing immune response. Tregs effectively regulate the immune response through a variety of different mechanisms,97,98 such as the suppression of the function of APCs and the production of immunosuppressive cytokines and metabolites. For example, Tregs make use of membrane-bound cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) to inhibit the function of APCs.99 In various cancers, the presence of high Tregs and low proportion of CD8+ T cells in TME is associated with poor prognosis.100 Th cells coordinate adaptive immune response and contribute to immune protection.101 They help maturation and activation of other lymphocytes, such as B cells, CTLs, and macrophages, and they also recruit various cell populations to sites of infection and inflammation. In one word, T cells play a crucial part in cancer immunotherapy. Knowing that most current anti-HCC immunotherapy studies focus on nanoparticles related to T cells, we will discuss nanoparticles that regulate the vitality of T cells in the following section.

Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is considered to be one of the most effective cytokines to trigger anti-tumor immune response for the reason that it simultaneously activates both innate and adaptive immune response and influences the process of T cells activation.102–105 Li et al designed CD8- and Glypican-3 antibody-modified dual-target PLGA nanoparticles loaded with IL-12.106 The prepared targeted immune nanoparticles (TINPs) could specifically bind to two target cell types, CD8+ T cells and HepG-2 cells, through antibody-antigen interactions. TINPs promoted activation and proliferation of T cells by targeting and delivering IL-12 precisely to T cells (Figure 5). In addition, they enabled T cells to kill tumor cells effectively by targeting HCC cells to cross-link T cells with tumor cells to form T cell and tumor cell clusters. Experiments showed that TINPs treatment promoted the activation and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. CD107a is a degranulation marker and an indicator of the ability of T cells to degrade target tumor cells.107 The studies found that compared with free IL-12, the expression of CD107a in CD8+ T cells and HepG-2 cells in the presence of TINPs was 5 times higher. Moreover, lactate dehydrogenase assay demonstrated that TINPs improved the lytic capacity of CD8+ T cells against HepG-2. These data indicated that TINPs can significantly enhance the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells.

Figure 5

Scheme showing that TINPs enhance CD8+ T cell functions and cancer immunotherapy.

In addition to direct infusion of IL-12 protein, administration of IL-12 mRNA can achieve efficient delivery of IL-12 to the HCC microenvironment. Lai et al developed LNPs loaded with IL-12 mRNA (IL-12- LNPs).108 After entering the body, IL-12- LNPs released IL-12 mRNA into cells, where they were translated by ribosomes into IL-12 protein, and then activated the immune response and caused the HCC regression. The results showed that CD3+ T cells increased significantly after IL-12-LNPs treatment, and promoted the infiltration of CD3+ Th cells into HCC and surrounding normal liver tissues. CD44 is a marker of T cells activation and can be used to determine the activation status of Th cells. Studies found that the number of recruited CD44+ immune cells increased in normal liver tissues after IL-12- LNPs treatment. It was reported that CD44 expression on CD3+, CD4+ Th cells could enhance Th1 responses by promoting the production of IFN-γ,109,110 indicating that IL-12-LNPs can activate CD44+, CD3+ and CD4+ Th cells and improve the immune response.

Tregs-mediated immunosuppression represents an important obstacle to effective anti-cancer immune response. That is to say, their inactivation or removal contributes to tumor immunotherapy. Interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) is a cytokine of the CXC family of chemokines, which has the functions of chemotaxis and activation of T cells and inducing lymphocytes infiltration in tumor sites.111,112 Lai et al developed folic acid-modified chitosan nanoparticles (IP10-FA-CS-NPs) loaded with IP-10 plasmid.113 Flow cytometric detection of Tregs in the spleen of H22 tumor-bearing mice showed the expression of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Tregs was 2.70±0.34% after treatment with IP10-FA-CS-NPs, which was significantly lower than that in the other groups. In addition, IP10-FA-CS-NPs also played an anti-tumor role in inhibiting HCC cells proliferation and inducing their apoptosis by promoting IFN-γ and IP-10.

DC-Modulating Nanoparticles

DCs are the most professional APCs in the immune system, and they make a difference in the initiation and regulation of antigen-specific immune response.114,115 Immature DCs have a high endocytosis activity and they can express a variety of intracellular and extracellular pathogen recognition receptors, such as toll-like receptors (TLRs). When DCs are subjected to external stimuli, they are activated and reach a mature antigen presentation state and then migrate to the draining lymphatic organs, where they trigger a strong antigen-specific T cell response by interacting with antigen-specific cells.116,117 Mature DCs can provide three signals to activate naive T cells. Signal 1: Mature DCs down-regulate their endocytic activity, highly express the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) on the surface, and present the processed peptides to the naive CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Signal 2: Mature DCs massively express accessory molecules and those interact with other receptors in T cells to enhance adhesion and costimulation.118 Signal 3: Mature DCs secrete a large amount of IL-12, which induces T cells activation.119 In the HCC, the decreased ability of DCs to present related antigens may be not only due to the decreased expression of human leukocyte antigen molecules120 but also due to the weak T cell immune response caused by maturation defects such as endocytosis, allogeneic stimulation and reduced IL-12 secretion.121 Studies have shown that the HCC patients infected with hepatitis B and C viruses have a reduced number of peripheral DCs and impaired function.122,123 Current strategies for the HCC treatment aim to design tumor vaccines promoting DCs maturation.

Development of DC-based anti-tumor vaccines is a promising way of tumor immunotherapy. However, the clinical application is limited due to their low immunogenicity and easy degradation. The use of nano-delivery systems to present antigens has many advantages, such as preventing antigens from being hydrolyzed by enzymes, promoting antigen distribution into APCs, and improving antigen storage shelf life.124 To further improve the activity of tumor vaccines, Yang et al prepared the nanoliposomes encapsulated with H22 hepatoma lysate and conjugated it with both mannose and CpG-ODN (M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo).125 It was reported that mannose-modified nanoliposomes can specifically target the mannose receptors that are highly expressed on the surface of DCs to achieve DCs-mediated anti-tumor activity.126 CpG-ODN is an effective immune adjuvant, which can produce strong immune stimulatory effects on a variety of cells and cytokines, and activate the immune response by inducing the expression of costimulatory factors. Cellular uptake and in vivo distribution experiments showed that DC2.4 cells could take up more mannosylated liposomes compared with unmodified liposomes, and the fluorescence intensity of mannose-liposomes and mannose-H22-liposomes was higher at the tumor site, illustrating that mannose modification improved the targeting ability of the liposomes towards the tumor tissue. After 48-h M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo treatment, the expression of MHC II and CD80/CD86 molecules on the surface of DC2.4 cells was significantly up-regulated, indicating that M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo could activate the maturation of DCs. In addition, M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo had good stability. After 10-day incubation in PBS containing 50% serum, M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo still retained the ability to activate DCs. Further research on the anti-tumor effect of M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo in a BALB/c mouse HCC model demonstrated that mice in the M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo group had smaller tumor volume and longer survival time compared with those in the control group. Detection of CD11b+Ly-6G+ MDSCs and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs in mice tumor and bone marrow showed that the proportion of MDSCs was reduced after M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo treatment. In addition, the percentage of Tregs was decreased, while IFN-γ cells in the spleen and the IgG level in serum were both elevated. These data revealed that M/CpG-ODN-H22-Lipo activated robust humoral and cellular immune response.

Given the poor antigenicity and systemic immunosuppression of traditional anti-tumor vaccines,127 RNA vaccines have been developed to activate the immune response. Compared with traditional tumor vaccines, RNA vaccines have the advantages of avoiding MHC classification restrictions and producing immunogenicity without adjuvants. Zhang et al extracted total RNA from liver cancer cells and constructed RNA-loaded LNPs (RNA-LNPs) targeting DCs.128 It was found that RNA-LNPs could translate and synthesize tumor antigens in DCs, induce high-efficiency anti-HCC specific immune response, and inhibit tumor growth. In vitro studies shown that compared with immature DCs, the expression of CD40, CD80, CD86, CD11c and MHC II molecules on the surface of DCs was increased to a level of mature DCs after RNA-LNPs treatment, indicating that DCs treated with RNA-LNPs can effectively promote the maturation of DCs. T cells proliferation studies found that DCs treated with RNA-LNPs and mature DCs stimulated the growth rate of CD8+ T cells by 51.8% and 51.3% respectively, indicating that the ability of DCs treated with RNA-LNPs to activate immune response is similar to that of mature DCs. In addition, the team also studied the prevention and treatment effects of RNA-LNPs on liver cancer. After mice were intravenously injected with RNA-LNPs, Hepa1-6 was injected subcutaneously to create a model to study the preventive effect of RNA-LNPs on HCC. Compared with the control group, tumor growth in the mice of RNA-LNPs group was significantly delayed. Hepa1-6 was injected subcutaneously and then administered to study the therapeutic effect of RNA-LNPs on HCC. Similar to the preventive effect of RNA-LNPs, its inhibitory effect on tumor growth was stronger than that in the control group. The above data indicated that RNA-LNPs could effectively prevent and inhibit the HCC progression in vivo.

Conclusion and Outlook

In this paper, we review the recent progress in the HCC treatment by using nano-delivery systems to modulate TME. TME is closely related to the HCC progression by promoting the HCC cells invasion and migration through various pathways. TME-related nanoparticles can protect the therapeutic agents from degradation and improve their targeting ability to HCC, thus increasing efficiency in modulating the TME. Current researches mainly focus on the modulation of CAFs, ECM, endothelial cells and the immune system, among which modulation of the immune system in the HCC is believed to have great potential in that it can effectively improve the immune response.

However, limited researches have been reported on the regulation of the HCC microenvironment compared with other cancers. For example, few studies have addressed the regulatory effect of nanoparticles on CAFs, MDSCs and tumor-associated neutrophils, knowing that these cells are also important in the HCC progression. Further studies are necessary. And there are still some problems that need to be solved. Firstly, it is necessary to gain a better understanding about the target components in the HCC microenvironment and how nanoparticles interact with these TME components, as this work will help better design nano-delivery systems to modulate TME. Secondly, more efforts should be devoted to the design of multiple-targeting methods that can simultaneously target multiple TME components in the HCC to achieve better therapeutic effects. Finally, how to overcome the low clinical conversion rate of nanoparticles is also a problem that needs to be explored. In conclusion, the use of nano-delivery systems to regulate TME has shown exciting prospects in the HCC treatment. It is expected that significant progress in the HCC treatment can be achieved in near future.