Literature DB >> 3561978

Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes.

R W Bucholz, A Carlton, R E Holmes.   

Abstract

Autografts have consistently outperformed calcium phosphate implants in most experimental models and clinical applications. However, human trials in metaphyseal defects demonstrate comparable results with autograft, hydroxyapatite, and TCP. Diaphyseal fractures and segmental defects represent more challenging problems, with less predictable results achieved with the synthetic bone graft substitutes. Improvements in the pore configuration, mechanical properties, and osteoinductive capacity of these implants should widen their future clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3561978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  37 in total

1.  Direct scaffolding of biomimetic hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites using aminosilane cross-linker for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Chi-Kai Chiu; Joao Ferreira; Tzy-Jiun M Luo; Haixia Geng; Feng-Chang Lin; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biphasic synthetic bone substitute use in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: clinical, radiological and histological results.

Authors:  C Schwartz; P Liss; B Jacquemaire; P Lecestre; P Frayssinet
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Coralline hydroxyapatite reinforced with polylactide fibres in lumbar interbody implantation.

Authors:  P Ylinen; M Raekallio; R Taurio; K Vihtonen; S Vainionpää; E K Partio; P Törmälä; P Rokkanen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Macroporous calcium phosphate glass-ceramic prepared by two-step pressing technique and using sucrose as a pore former.

Authors:  Cong Wang; Toshihiro Kasuga; Masayuki Nogami
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  [Analysis of the effectiveness of an internal hospital bone bank].

Authors:  M Flören; T Kappe; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Quantification of bone mass gain in response to the application of biphasic bioceramics and platelet concentrate in critical-size bone defects.

Authors:  Sonja Ellen Lobo; Francisco Henrique Lanna Wykrota; Ana Carolina Marques Barbosa Oliveira; Irina Kerkis; Germán Bohorquez Mahecha; Humberto José Alves
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Preliminary experience with a novel model assessing in vivo mechanical strength of bone grafts and substitute materials.

Authors:  K R Hamson; J M Toth; J B Stiehl; K L Lynch
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  The interface between ionomer cement and bone in the porcine cervical spine.

Authors:  J J Langmayr; P Seykora; R Jakober; G Klima; M Ortler
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses.

Authors:  S Santavirta; D Nordström; P Ylinen; Y T Konttinen; T Silvennoinen; P Rokkanen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Development and biological evaluation of fluorophosphonate-modified hydroxyapatite for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gráinne Neary; Ashley W Blom; Anna I Shiel; Gabrielle Wheway; Jason P Mansell
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.