| Literature DB >> 35619662 |
Rujittika Mungmunpuntipantip1, Viroj Wiwanitkit2.
Abstract
COVID-19 immunization has been shown to be effective in the prevention of COVID-19. Traditionally, two vaccination doses given by intramuscular injection are required. Many scientists present ideas for an alternative administration of COVID-19 for reducing the cost and solving the problem of insufficient COVID-19 vaccine supply. Regarding the new alternative vaccine administration, the important consideration is on cost, utility and safety. Herein, we performed cost-utility-safety analysis of alternative intradermal versus classical intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination. From cost analysis, a 80% cost reduction was derived from using intradermal COVID-19 vaccine administration comparing to intramuscular vaccination. Additional, cost-utility and cost-safety analysis also show that the cost per utility and cost per safety values for intradermal vaccination are lower than those of intramuscular vaccination. According to current research, intradermal immunization is a viable alternative to traditional intramuscular COVID-19 vaccine and may even be superior. IJPPPEntities:
Keywords: COVID-19; cost; intradermal; utility; vaccine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35619662 PMCID: PMC9123469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol ISSN: 1944-8171