Literature DB >> 35618884

Brain-penetrant calcium channel blockers are associated with a reduced incidence of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Lucy Colbourne1,2, Paul J Harrison3,4.   

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) differ in their ability to penetrate into the brain. Pharmacoepidemiological studies suggest that CCBs as a class may have beneficial effects on the risks and outcomes of some psychiatric and neurological disorders. It is plausible but unknown whether this effect relates to their brain penetrance. To address this, we used the TriNetX electronic health records network to identify people prescribed a brain-penetrant CCB (BP-CCB), or those given amlodipine, a CCB with low brain penetrability. We created cohorts of patients who, prior to first CCB exposure, either had to have, or could not have had, a recorded ICD-10 diagnosis in any of the following categories: psychotic disorder; affective disorder (including bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder); anxiety disorder; substance use disorder; sleep disorder; delirium; dementia, or movement disorder. Cohort pairs were propensity score matched for age, sex, race, blood pressure, body mass index, and a range of other variables. The outcomes were the incidence of these disorders measured over a two-year exposure period. Matched cohort sizes ranged from 17,896 to 49,987. In people with no prior history of psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorder, there was a significantly lower incidence of most disorders with BP-CCBs compared to amlodipine, with risk ratios ranging from 0.64 to 0.88 and an overall risk ratio of 0.88, i.e. a risk reduction of 12%. In people who did have a prior psychiatric or neurodegenerative diagnosis, differences were much smaller, but again showed lower risks for several disorders with BP-CCBs compared to amlodipine. The differences were somewhat more marked in women and in people less than 60 years old. Results were similar when comparing BP-CCBs with verapamil and diltiazem. We also compared BP-CCBs with angiotensin receptor blockers, and found an overall risk ratio of 0.94 in favour of BP-CCBs, but with differential effects across disorders including a higher risk of psychotic disorder and dementia, but a lower risk for anxiety and sleep disorders. In some analyses, there was evidence of residual confounding even after the extensive matching, in that negative control outcomes showed a reduced incidence with BP-CCBs relative to the comparator cohort. In summary, CCBs that readily penetrate the brain are associated with a lower incidence of neuropsychiatric disorders, especially first diagnoses, compared to CCBs which do not. This may reflect their blockade of neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels. The findings encourage repurposing trials using existing BP-CCBs, and suggest that novel BP-CCBs with enhanced and more selective central actions might have greater therapeutic potential for psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35618884     DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01615-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


  61 in total

Review 1.  Calcium-antagonist drugs.

Authors:  D R Abernethy; J B Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Applications of calcium channel blockers in psychiatry: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of treatment of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Steven L Dubovsky
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  Calcium channel blockers in psychiatric disorders: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L E Hollister; E S Trevino
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Nimodipine monotherapy and carbamazepine augmentation in patients with refractory recurrent affective illness.

Authors:  P J Pazzaglia; R M Post; T A Ketter; A M Callahan; L B Marangell; M A Frye; M S George; T A Kimbrell; G S Leverich; G Cora-Locatelli; D Luckenbaugh
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.153

5.  Calcium antagonists in mania: a double-blind study of verapamil.

Authors:  S L Dubovsky; R D Franks; S Allen; J Murphy
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Verapamil in affective disorders: a controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  C Höschl; J Kozený
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  A systematic review of calcium channel antagonists in bipolar disorder and some considerations for their future development.

Authors:  A Cipriani; K Saunders; M-J Attenburrow; J Stefaniak; P Panchal; S Stockton; T A Lane; E M Tunbridge; J R Geddes; P J Harrison
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  Voltage-gated calcium channel blockers for psychiatric disorders: genomic reappraisal.

Authors:  Paul J Harrison; Elizabeth M Tunbridge; Annette C Dolphin; Jeremy Hall
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 9.  Genetic disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Samuel Heyes; Wendy S Pratt; Elliott Rees; Shehrazade Dahimene; Laurent Ferron; Michael J Owen; Annette C Dolphin
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Cellular calcium in bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul J Harrison; Nicola Hall; Arne Mould; Noura Al-Juffali; Elizabeth M Tunbridge
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.