| Literature DB >> 35618796 |
Supachok Tanpichai1,2, Farin Phoothong3, Anyaporn Boonmahitthisud4,5,6.
Abstract
Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on Earth, has been widely attracted owing to availability, intoxicity, and biodegradability. Environmentally friendly hydrogels were successfully prepared from water hyacinth-extracted cellulose using a dissolution approach with sodium hydroxide and urea, and sodium tetraborate decahydrate (borax) was used to generate cross-linking between hydroxyl groups of cellulose chains. The incorporation of borax could provide the superabsorbent feature into the cellulose hydrogels. The uncross-linked cellulose hydrogels had a swelling ratio of 325%, while the swelling ratio of the cross-linked hydrogels could achieve ~ 900%. With increasing borax concentrations, gel fraction of the cross-linked hydrogels increased considerably. Borax also formed char on cellulose surfaces and generated water with direct contact with flame, resulting in flame ignition and propagation delay. Moreover, the cross-linked cellulose-based hydrogels showed antibacterial activity for gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus). The superabsorbent cross-linked cellulose-based hydrogels prepared in this work could possibly be used for wound dressing, agricultural, and flame retardant coating applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35618796 PMCID: PMC9134984 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12688-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Advantages and drawbacks of cross-linking methods to form hydrogels [10–14].
| Methods | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Physical cross-linking | - No use of chemical crosslinking agents - Reversible cross-linking | - Poor stability of hydrogels - Weak cross-linking bonding - Difficulty to control the cross-linking density - Poor mechanical strength |
| Chemical cross-linking | - Stable hydrogels - Strong cross-linked bonding - High cross-linking density - High mechanical strength | - Toxicity of residual cross-linking agents |
| Radiation cross-linking | - No requirement for catalysts or additives to initiate a reaction - Possibility to control cross-linking points | - Weak mechanical strength - High cost and energy consumption |
Figure 1Cross-linking mechanisms between hydroxyl groups of polymers and borax as a cross-linker.
Figure 2Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of purified water hyacinth fibers (F) and cross-linked hydrogels with various concentrations of borax in the range of (a) 4,000 – 400 cm-1 and (b) 1,500 – 1,100 cm-1.
Figure 3X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of purified water hyacinth fibers (F) and cross-linked cellulose hydrogels with various concentrations of borax.
Figure 4(a) Thermogravimetric (TG) and (b) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of purified water hyacinth fibers and cross-linked hydrogels with various concentrations of borax.
Figure 5Transmittance of the cross-linked cellulose hydrogels with borax.
Figure 6Scanning election microscopy (SEM) images of the cross-linked hydrogels with various concentrations of borax after freeze-drying.
Figure 7Schematic illustration of cross-linking reaction between cellulose chains at a low and high concentration of borax.
Water content, swelling ratio, and gel fraction of the cellulose hydrogels with different loadings of borax. Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among samples measured under the same testing condition.
| Materials | Water content (%) | Swelling ratio (%) | Gel fraction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0 | 90.8 ± 0.4a | 325.2 ± 33.6a | 2.2 ± 0.3a |
| B1 | 92.6 ± 0.1b | 553.1 ± 13.4b | 8.8 ± 0.2b |
| B2 | 92.8 ± 0.1c | 772.4 ± 13.5c | 10.3 ± 1.5b |
| B3 | 93.5 ± 0.1d | 877.3 ± 44.4d | 17.3 ± 3.1c |
| B4 | 93.2 ± 0.1e | 828.2 ± 9.9d | 18.0 ± 2.6c |
| B5 | 93.0 ± 0.2f | 831.0 ± 50.1d | 21.3 ± 0.5d |
Significant values are in [a, b, c, d, e, f].
The percent reduction of E. coli bacteria and S. aureus bacteria of the cellulose hydrogel with the weight ratios of cellulose and borax of 1 to 3.
| Materials | % reduction of | % reduction of |
|---|---|---|
| B3 | − 5.11 | 20.7 |