Literature DB >> 35618753

Response to: Is undergraduate ophthalmology teaching in the United Kingdom still fit for purpose?

Aminah Iffah Jawaheer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35618753      PMCID: PMC9135100          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02116-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   4.456


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

I read the Editorial ‘Is undergraduate ophthalmology teaching in the United Kingdom still fit for purpose?’ with interest [1]. In my experience, undergraduate medical teaching does not allow enough time for clinical skills training for most students to develop an interest in ophthalmology. Having initially trained in optometry and now being a foundation trainee, there was a stark contrast in my educational experience from one course to the other. My total exposure to ophthalmology at medical school amounted to 2 weeks and like many others, was reduced by the COVID-19 pandemic [2]. Although technology can make up for some of this shortfall, as a learning tool, it still renders learning somewhat passive, and is not representative of clinical practice in the UK. Competency in basic clinical skills complements and cements the understanding of ocular anatomy and pathophysiology [3]. Medical students miss out during observerships compared to their optometry counterparts in that respect. We ought to advocate for clinical skills, especially ophthalmoscopy, to be incorporated right from the early years of study onwards. It is a skill that requires time to hone, with regular practice and remains equally relevant to ward-based trainees as well as primary care doctors [4]. Technology-enhanced learning methodologies have good evidence as effective learning tools and are useful adjuncts to what can often seem like variable clinical experiences [5]. However, these are not all readily implemented or standardised across medical schools. Blended learning styles provide the necessary stimulation to promote engagement in the traditional classroom. But in my opinion, students also require familiarity and confidence to use resources likely to be at their disposal once in clinical practice. It helps to pair up with peers for mock sessions, a useful way of developing skills after participating in clinical workshops headed by faculty members, including the wider multi-disciplinary team, such as orthoptists and optometrists. In answer to the article’s question, I believe the UK undergraduate ophthalmology teaching curriculum has the potential to be optimised for prospective medical students. We ought to incorporate new ways of learning as well as involve our multi-disciplinary team in teaching basic clinical skills more consistently.
  5 in total

1.  Multimedia learning tools for teaching undergraduate ophthalmology: results of a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Michael Steedman; Marwan Abouammoh; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 2.  A systematic review of best practices in teaching ophthalmology to medical students.

Authors:  Tony Succar; John Grigg; Hilary A Beaver; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  The junior doctor view of undergraduate ophthalmology education.

Authors:  Shahzaib Rehan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Is undergraduate ophthalmology teaching in the United Kingdom still fit for purpose?

Authors:  Y Scantling-Birch; H Naveed; N Tollemache; P Gounder; S Rajak
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  A virtual COVID-19 ophthalmology rotation.

Authors:  Sydney Wendt; Zainub Abdullah; Spencer Barrett; Cyrus Daruwalla; Jonathan A Go; Brandon Le; Elijah Li; Chelsea Livingston; Matthew Miller; Lauren Nakhleh; Joseph Pecha; Shravya Pothula; Swetak Pradhan; Varsha Sathappan; Alay Shah; Alan-Michael Sonuyi; Peter Ugoh; Qiancheng Wang; Nicole Weber; Tony Succar; Lauren Blieden; Peter Mortensen; Zachary Elkin; Grace Sun; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.