Csilla Molnár1, Judit Gál1, Dorottya Szántó1, László Fülöp2, Andrea Szegedi2, Péter Siró1, Endre V Nagy3, Szabolcs Lengyel4, János Kappelmayer5, Béla Fülesdi1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. 2. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. 4. Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) is an important complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), that may delay surgical or endovascular treatment and may influence patient outcome. This prospective follow-up study intended to collect data on the prevalence, severity, influencing factors and long-term outcome of TTC in patients suffering from non-traumatic SAH. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted with the diagnosis of non-traumatic SAH were included. Intitial assessment consisted of cranial CT, Hunt-Hess, Fisher and WFNS scoring, 12-lead ECG, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transcranial duplex sonography and collecting laboratory parameters (CK, CK-MB, cardiac troponin T, NT-proBNP and urine metanephrine and normetanephrine). Diagnosis of TTC was based on modified Mayo criteria. TTC patients were dichotomized to mild and severe forms. Follow-up of TTE, Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment, Barthel's and Karnofsky scoring occurred on days 30 and 180. RESULTS: One hundred thirty six patients were included. The incidence of TTC in the entire cohort was 28.7%; of them, 20.6% and 8.1% were mild and severe, respectively. TTC was more frequent in females (30/39; 77%) than in males (9/39; 23%) and was more severe. The occurrence of TTC was related to mFisher scores and WFNS scores. Although the severity of TTC was related to mFisher score, Hunt-Hess score, WFNS score and GCS, multivariate analysis showed the strongest relationship with mFisher scores. Ejection fraction differences between groups were present on day 30, but disappeared by day 180, whereas wall motion score index was still higher in the severe TTC group at day 180. By the end of the follow-up period (180 days), 70 (74.5%) patients survived in the non-TTC, 22 (81.5%) in the mild TTC and 3 (27%) in the severe TTC group (n = 11) (p = 0.002). At day 180, GOS, Barthel, and Karnofsky outcome scores were higher in patients in the control (non-TTC) and the mild TTC groups than in the severe TTC group. CONCLUSIONS: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a frequent finding in patients with SAH, and severe TTC may be present in 8% of SAH cases. The severity of TTC may be an independent predictor of mortality and outcome at 6 months after disease onset. Therefore, a regular follow-up of ECG and TTE abnormalities is warranted in patients with subrachnoid hemorrhage for early detection of TTC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Clinical Trials Register under the registration number of NCT02659878 (date of registration: January 21, 2016).
BACKGROUND: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) is an important complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), that may delay surgical or endovascular treatment and may influence patient outcome. This prospective follow-up study intended to collect data on the prevalence, severity, influencing factors and long-term outcome of TTC in patients suffering from non-traumatic SAH. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted with the diagnosis of non-traumatic SAH were included. Intitial assessment consisted of cranial CT, Hunt-Hess, Fisher and WFNS scoring, 12-lead ECG, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transcranial duplex sonography and collecting laboratory parameters (CK, CK-MB, cardiac troponin T, NT-proBNP and urine metanephrine and normetanephrine). Diagnosis of TTC was based on modified Mayo criteria. TTC patients were dichotomized to mild and severe forms. Follow-up of TTE, Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment, Barthel's and Karnofsky scoring occurred on days 30 and 180. RESULTS: One hundred thirty six patients were included. The incidence of TTC in the entire cohort was 28.7%; of them, 20.6% and 8.1% were mild and severe, respectively. TTC was more frequent in females (30/39; 77%) than in males (9/39; 23%) and was more severe. The occurrence of TTC was related to mFisher scores and WFNS scores. Although the severity of TTC was related to mFisher score, Hunt-Hess score, WFNS score and GCS, multivariate analysis showed the strongest relationship with mFisher scores. Ejection fraction differences between groups were present on day 30, but disappeared by day 180, whereas wall motion score index was still higher in the severe TTC group at day 180. By the end of the follow-up period (180 days), 70 (74.5%) patients survived in the non-TTC, 22 (81.5%) in the mild TTC and 3 (27%) in the severe TTC group (n = 11) (p = 0.002). At day 180, GOS, Barthel, and Karnofsky outcome scores were higher in patients in the control (non-TTC) and the mild TTC groups than in the severe TTC group. CONCLUSIONS: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a frequent finding in patients with SAH, and severe TTC may be present in 8% of SAH cases. The severity of TTC may be an independent predictor of mortality and outcome at 6 months after disease onset. Therefore, a regular follow-up of ECG and TTE abnormalities is warranted in patients with subrachnoid hemorrhage for early detection of TTC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Clinical Trials Register under the registration number of NCT02659878 (date of registration: January 21, 2016).
First described in a case series of Japanese patients in 1991, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) represents a reversible left ventricular dysfunction, that mimicks acute coronary syndrome, without the evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease [1]. In the past 3 decades several synonimes were used for TTC, including “apical balloning”, “stress-induced cardiomyopathy”, “broken heart syndrome” and “transient ventricular ballooning syndrome” [2]. Its estimated incidence is 100 new cases per 1 million inhabitans per year [3] and the prevalence of the syndrome ranges from 1.7 to 2.2% among patients admitted with suspected coronary artery syndrome [4]. The most important causative factors are intense emotional events and any form of physical stress, including severe medical illness. Neurological emergencies represent a large group of the underlying diseases; among them most frequent are subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic stroke and epileptic status [5-7]. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is the most common neurological cause, making up one-third of the cases. [8]. The prevalence of TTC in SAH ranges from 1.2% up to 26% in different studies [9-12]. The relatively wide range of the prevalence might be in part explained by the changing definition of TTC over the past decades. Recent evidence suggest that prospective studies using predetermined time intervals for echocardiography and taking apical and mild cases also into account may be necessary to evalute the real incidence [13-15]. The importance of TTC in SAH is underlined by the fact that it may lead to neurogenic pulmonary edema, necessitate hemodynamic and ventilatory support and thus has the potential to hamper the treatment especially in severe subarachnoid hemorrhage cases with cerebral vasospasm or raised intracranial pressure. Additionally, TTC may delay surgical or endovascular treatment. Up till now, the majority of the knowledge about the natural history of TTC among patients with SAH has been gathered from retrospective analysis of databases. Prospective long-term follow-up studies on the prevalence and clinical outcome of TTC are scarce.In the present study we collected data prospectively on the prevalence, severity, influencing factors and long-term outcome of TTC in patients suffering from non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Subjects and methods
This prospective follow up study was performed at the 8-bed neurosurgical ICU of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Debrecen. The ICU serves as a regional center for managing acute subarachnoid hemorrhages being responsible for approximately 2 million inhabitants. During the period between March 2017 and December 2018, all patients who were admitted for SAH were checked for eligibility. The study was registered at the Clinical Trials Register under the registration number of NCT02659878 (date of registration: January 21, 2016). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Debrecen (registration number: DE RKEB/IKEB:4317–2015). All included patients or their closest relatives gave written informed consent before participation.Inclusion criteria were acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in adult (age >18 years) patients, provided that the patient arrived at the hospital not later than 48 hours after symptom onset. Patients with head trauma, angioma or A-V malformations were excluded. Patients with known myocardial diseases, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, known structural heart diseases (severe, clinically significant valve insufficiency, and /or significant stenosis) preexisting myocarditis, known coronary artery stenosis necessitating ballon angioplasty, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and phaechromocytoma were excluded.Decision on the treatment modality in the acute phase (coling or surgical clipping) was based on consultation with the neurosurgeon and neurointerventionist. Non-surgical and non-interventional therapy at the ICU was performed according to the local protocol that includes maintenance of normovolemia, normocapnia, normoxemia, normomagnesemia and normoglycemia. The use of nimodipine (6x60 mg per os) and analgosedation was based on international guidelines [16]. During the course of the disease, surgical interventions or placing intraventricular or lumbar drains were performed as required.The diagnosis of TTC was based on the modified Mayo criteria [17], taking the following aspects into account:Transient LV/RV wall motion abnormalities, usually extending beyond a single epicardial coronary artery distributionEvidence of myocardial involvement by biomarker elevation: cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase, brain natriuretic peptide; N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptideECG abnormalities: ST elevation/depression, negative T-waves, new bundle brunch blocksPotential coronary artery culprit ruled outDiagnosis of TTC was first verified or excluded in each SAH patient by performing the investigations listed above within 24 hours after admission.On admission and on the subsequent 6 days (days 1 trough 7) the following investigations were performed on a daily basis: 12-lead ECG; cardiac biomarkers (cardiac troponin T, creatine kinase, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide), transcranial color-coded duplex sonography with blood flow velocity measurements, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). World Federation of Neurological Society (WFNS) scores, Fisher and Hunt-Hess grading were performed at admission. Collection of urine for determination of urine metanephrine and normetanephrine levels, and transthoracic echocardiography was performed on day 1 and day 7. If new ECG abnormalities occured between days 1 and 7, additional echcardiography was performed immediately.During the visit the following diagnostic measures were taken: transthoracic echocardiography; 12-lead ECG; New York Heart Association score (NYHA score) assessment; Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment; Barthel’s and Karnofsky indices assessments. Additionally, patients were asked to perform a 24-hours timed collection of urine for determination of urine metanephrine and normetanephrine levels one day prior to coming for checkup. If cardiac wall motion abnormality was present on echocardiography, cardiac stress test, CT coronary angiography or conventional coronary angiography were performed as required.During the same tests and examinations were performed as on day 30.Transthoracic echocardiography was performed by two experienced cardiologists (LF, ASz) by Mindray TE7 device (P4-2s 3.5 MHz harmonic imaging transducer) at the initial hospitalization and during follow-up. Investigators were unaware of patient’s other parameters (laboratory and ECG results referring to TTC), they only knew that the patient suffered from SAH. During echocardiographic evaluation in 2D-mode the parasternal short axis and apical two- and three-chamber views have been visualized to evaluate left ventricular systolic and end diastolic diameters and wall motion abnormalities. Ejection fraction was calculated by Simpson’s equation.According to the international guidelines the diagnosis of TTC was based on transthoracic echocardiography. This is merely based on two factors: hypo- or akinesis of at least one or more segments of the heart and decreased ejection fraction. The wall motion abnormalities were defined by using the 16-segment model. Segmental wall motion abnormalities have been scored according to the usual method: 1- normokinesis, 2- hypokinesis, 3- akinesis, 4 -dyskinesis, 5 -aneurysm. In order to describe the number and the severity of the affected myocardial regions, the wall motion score index (WMSI) was calculated by dividing the total of the wall motion scores of each segment by 16. [18]. We also took the ejection fraction into account for the differentiation between mild (EF≥40%) and severe TTC (EF <40%). Ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities have also been detected during the follow-up (30 and 180 days after the initial hospitalization).Transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD) sonography was performed by two experienced investigators (BF, PS) using the 2 MHz sector transducer of the GE Venue Go (GE Healthcare 9900 Innovation Drive Wauwatosa, WI 53226 U.S.A.) ultrasound device. He was unaware of the laboratory parameters and the other results, but knew that the patient suffered from SAH. The transtemporal window was insonated and orientation within the structure of the circle of Willis occurred in color mode. After identifying the different vessels of the circle, daily measurements of the middle cerebral, anterior cerebral and posterior cerebral arteries were performed on both sides. Regular TCCD measurements were registered in all patients between days 1 through 7. If ultrasound signs of vasospasm were present in any of the cases, duplex sonographies were performed until day 21 on a daily basis. Cerebral blood flow velocities, pulsatility indices and S/D ratios (systolic velocity/diastolic velocity) were documented in all cases. Based on previous suggestions, vasospasm was considered if mean blood flow velocity was higher than 120 cm/s and severe vasospasm was diagnosed if mean blood flow velocity exceeded 200 cm/s [19].
Laboratory tests
Creatine kinase activity was determined by a UV kinetic assay utilizing hexokinase and glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase enzymes after the rate limiting CK step. CK-MB was expressed as CK-MB activity by using immunoinhibition with antibodies to the CK-M subunit and subsequently measuring the CK activity as described above by using Roche reagents.The high sensitive Troponin T assay was measured by an electrochemiluminescent (ECLIA) immunoassay on a Cobas e411 analyzer.An ECLIA immunoassay was used measuring the N-terminal portion of the pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) that has a considerably longer half life than the active peptide and thus is more suitable for risk stratification.Metanephrines are usually present in the urine in the form of glucuronate- or sulphate-conjugates, thus as the first step an acid hydrolysis was done. Subsequently, urine samples were diluted by a neutralizing buffer and the measurement was carried out by an isocratic HPLC using an electrochemical detector (ABL and E-Jasco system).
Statistical analysis
To analyse r×c contingency tables, we used χ2-tests. When 2×2 tables were analysed, we applied Yates’ correction for continuity. When the number of expected cases was too small (< 5) in more than 20% of the cells, we used a χ2-test with a simulated p-value calculated in a Monte-Carlo randomisation based on 2000 replicates as implemented in the ‘chisq.test’ function of R.For the analysis of continuous variables, we checked the homogeneity of variances with the Bartlett test and checked the normal distribution of variables by the Shapiro-Wilks test. In the analysis of variables that were non-normally distributed and/or had heterogeneous variances, we used non-parametric statistical tests. In such cases, we applied Kruskal-Wallis tests, i.e., one-way non-parametric ANOVAs based on ranks to analyse differences between the study groups.To analyse the effect of one or more continuous independent variables such as age on binary dependent variables such as the occurrence of TTC (no/yes), we applied binary logistic regression using the ‘glm’ function of R and specifying binomial error distribution. To analyse the effect of one or more continuous independent variables on ordinal variables (that have qualitative levels that can be ordered), such as the severity of TTC (no TTC, mild and severe TTC), we applied ordinal logistic regression using the ‘polr’ function of R. When there were more than one independent variables, we first ran the full logistic regression model with all variables, and then removed non-significant (p < 0.05) variables in a backward stepwise fashion. We report z values (binomial regression), t values (ordinal regression) and odds ratios for logistic regression tests.To analyse the effect of study group and continuous independent variables on continuous dependent variables, we applied general linear models (GLM) using the ‘lm’ function of R. For such tests, we report contrasts with the control group as reference (for study group) and slope coefficients ± standard errors (for continuous independent variables) and F values along with p values.For all statistical analyses, we used the R statistical environment, version 3.6.3. (R Core Team 2020). For all graphs, we used the ‘ggplot2’ package of R.
Results
One hundred thirty six patients were included to the study. The flowchart in Fig 1 shows the study cohort, inclusion and exclusion, as well as the numbers of patients during follow-up. General patient characteristics and confounding factors are summarized in Table 1. The most important characteristics of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the entire cohort is shown in Table 2. In the entire cohort endovascular treatment was performed in 73, surgical clipping in 21 patients, in 42 patients no intervention was performed. A placement of an intraventricular drain was necessary in 40 cases, whereas lumbar drain was placed in 5 cases.
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy developed in 39 of the 136 patients (28.7%). TTC was mild or severe in 28 (20.6%) and 11 (8.1%) patients, respectively.The distribution of the different patterns according to the recommendation (2) was as follows: classical pattern: n = 10; mid-ventricular pattern: n = 1; reverse pattern: n = 4; focal type: n = 21; atypical pattern (global): n = 3. TTC developed within 7 days after admission in 4 cases, all were focal type.
The effect of age and gender on the occurence and severity of TTC
The occurrence of TTC was not related to the age of the patients (binomial logistic regression, odds ratio: 1.015, z = 0.821, p = 0.412). Similarly, the severity of TTC was not related to patient age (ordinal logistic regression, coefficient = 0.013 ± S.E. 0.018, odds ratio: 1.013, t = 0.729, p = 0.466).Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was more frequent in females (30/39; 77%) than in males (9/39; 23%). TTC occurred in 30 (37.5%) of the 80 female patients and in 9 (16%) out of the 56 male patients. The difference was statistically significant (Yates-corrected χ2 = 6.385, df = 1, p = 0.012. TTC appeared to be more severe in female patients: 23 (29%) presented with mild and 7 (9%) with severe TTC, compared to male patients: 5 (9%) mild and 4 (7%) severe TTC cases, respectively (χ2 = 8.152, simulated p = 0.015).
The effect of comorbidities on the occurrence of TTC
The occurrence of TTC was not influenced by any of the comorbidities studied (S1 Table). A binomial logistic regression calculated in a general linear model testing the effect of each additional illness on the occurrence of TTC (yes/no) found that none of the eight illnesses/conditions influenced the occurrence of TTC.
The relationship between comorbidities and severity of TTC
The severity of TTC was not influenced by any of the comorbidities studied (S2 Table). An ordinal logistic regression calculated in a general linear model testing the effect of each additional illness on the severity of TTC (none, mild, severe) found that none of the eight illnesses influenced the severity of TTC.
The relationship between the occurrence of TTC and the severity scores at admission
The incidence of TTC was related to the modified Fisher scores; it increased from 13% in patients with Fisher score of 1 to 16% in score 2, 30% in score 3; 41% in patients with score 4 (Table 3). The occurrence of TTC also increased with WFNS score from 18% in patients with score 1 and to 39% in score 2, 14% in score 3 patients, 35% in score 4 and 48% in score 5 patients (Table 3). None of the other variables influenced the occurrence of TTC (Table 3).
Table 3
Occurrence of TTC in SAV variable categories.
SAV variable
No TTC
TTC
χ2
Location of aneurysm‡
Internal carotid
12
8
Anterior and middle cerebral
24
6
2.984 n.s.
Anterior and posterior communicating
32
15
Other
12
5
No aneurysm
17
5
Ventricular bleeding (Y/N)
46/51
23/16
1.059 n.s.
Parenchymal bleeding (Y/N)
21/76
6/33
0.349 n.s.
Bleeding extent (side)
Left
8
3
1.311 n.s.
Right
11
3
Bilateral
2
0
No bleeding
76
33
Bleeding location (lobe)
Frontal
7
3
2.060 n.s.
Frontotemporal
3
0
None
76
33
Temporal
5
2
Temporoparietal
6
1
Hunt-Hess grade
1
18
5
6.856 n.s.
2
31
6
3
19
12
4
15
6
5
14
10
Modified Fisher score
1
27
4
9.481*
2
16
3
p = 0.024
3
19
8
4
35
24
WFNS
1
51
11
9.823*
2
11
7
p = 0.041
3
6
1
4
17
9
5
12
11
GCS
3–4
6
5
5–6
6
6
7–8
13
3
13.509 *
9–12
4
6
p<0.05
13–14
17
8
15
51
11
Significant variables are highlighted in Bold.
Note:
* p < 0.05; n.s. indicates non-significant difference
‡ neighbouring values or similar categories were pooled to meet χ2-test assumptions.
Significant variables are highlighted in Bold.Note:* p < 0.05; n.s. indicates non-significant difference‡ neighbouring values or similar categories were pooled to meet χ2-test assumptions.
Relationship between severity of TTC and severity scores at admission
The severity of TTC was related to modified Fisher score, Hunt-Hess score, WFNS score and GCS (Table 4). The incidence of mild TTC was 13%, 11%, 26% and 25% in patients with modified Fisher score of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, whereas the incidence of severe TTC increased from 0 in patients with score 1 to 5% in score 2, 4% in score 3 and 15% in score 4 patients (Table 4).
Table 4
Severity of TTC in different SAH variable categories.
SAV variable
No TTC
Mild TTC
Severe TTC
χ2
(n = 97)
(n = 28)
(n = 11)
Location of aneurysm‡
3.836 n.s.
Internal carotid
12
5
3
Middle and anterior cerebral
24
4
2
Anterior and posterior communicating
32
11
4
Other
12
4
1
No aneurysm
17
4
1
Ventricular bleeding (Y/N)
46/51
14/14
9/2
4.684 n.s.
Parenchymal bleeding (Y/N)
21/76
4/24
2/9
0.761 n.s.
Bleeding side
1.392 n.s.
Left
8
2
1
Right
11
2
1
Bilateral
2
0
0
No bleeding
76
24
9
Bleeding extent (lobe)
Frontal
7
2
1
2.779 n.s.
Frontotemporal
3
0
0
None
76
24
9
Temporal
5
1
1
Temporoparietal
6
1
0
Hunt-Hess grade
22.687** p = 0.004
1
18
5
0
2
31
6
0
3
19
9
3
4
15
5
1
5
14
3
7
Modified Fisher score
12.668* p = 0.047
1
27
4
0
2
16
2
1
3
19
7
1
4
35
15
9
WFNS score
1
51
11
0
24.258** p = 0.003
2
11
5
2
3
6
1
0
4
17
7
2
5
12
4
7
GCS
22.616*** p = 0.001
3–6
12
4
7
7–12
17
7
2
13–14
17
6
2
15
51
11
0
Significant effects are highlighted in Bold.
Note:
* p < 0.05;
** p < 0.01;
*** p < 0.001
‡ neighbouring values or similar categories were pooled to meet χ2-test assumptions.
Significant effects are highlighted in Bold.Note:* p < 0.05;** p < 0.01;*** p < 0.001‡ neighbouring values or similar categories were pooled to meet χ2-test assumptions.The incidence of mild TTC varied between 13% (Hunt-Hess score 5) and 29% (H-H score 3) with no obvious trend, whereas the incidence of severe TTC increased from 0 in patients with scores 1 and 2 to 10% in score 3, 5% in score 4 and 29% in score 5 patients (Table 4). The incidence of mild TTC also varied between 17% and 28% in the five WFNS score groups, while the incidence of severe TTC increased from 0 in scores 1 and 3 to 11% in score 2, 8% in score 4 and 30% in score 5 (Table 4). Finally, the incidence of severe TTC was highest (30%) in GCS scores 3 to 6, was lower in scores 7 to 12 and 13 to 14 (8% each) was 0 in score 15; mild TTC varied in frequency between 17 and 27% with no obvious trend (Table 4).When the effects of all SAV variables were tested simultaneously in a binomial logistic regression followed by backward stepwise removal of non-significant effects, only the modified Fisher score influenced the incidence of TTC, and a positive coefficient indicated that TTC was more likely to occur in patients with higher modified Fisher scores (estimate: 0.54 ± S.E. 0.185, odds ratio: 1.719, z = 2.923, p = 0.003). Similarly, the severity of TTC showed a positive relationship with only the modified Fisher score (estimate: 0.57 ± 0.185, odds ratio: 1.764, z = 3.071, p = 0.036).
Relationship between development of vasospasm and TTC
Vasospasm (any type) occurred in 23/97 patients in the control (non TTC) group and 13/39 in the TTC group (Chi2:0.74; P = 0.36), indicating that TS was not more frequent in SAH patients in whom vasospasm developed. Severe vasospasm occurred in 5/97 patients and 6/39 patients in the non-TTC and TTC groups, respectively (Chi2:2,87; p = 0.09).
Laboratory parameters
For CK, the differences between the three groups were significant on day 1 (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 11.642, df = 2, p = 0.003), day 2 (χ2 = 8.673, df = 2, p = 0.013) and day 4 (χ2 = 7.478, df = 2, p = 0.024) but not on the other days. For CK-MB, the differences were significant on day 1 (χ2 = 9.346, df = 2, p = 0.009), but not on the other days. For CTNT, the differences were highly significant each day, mostly because of high values in the severe TTC group (Fig 2).
Fig 2
Differences in cardiac troponin T (CTNT) between study groups from day 1 to 7.
Boxplots show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values, with outliers omitted for clarity. Differences are highly significant each day (p<0.001).
Differences in cardiac troponin T (CTNT) between study groups from day 1 to 7.
Boxplots show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values, with outliers omitted for clarity. Differences are highly significant each day (p<0.001).For NTPBNP, the differences were also highly significant each day because of high values in the severe TTC group (Fig 3).
Fig 3
Differences in N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NTPBNP) between study groups from day 1 to 7.
Boxplots show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values, with outliers omitted for clarity. Differences are highly significant each day (p<0.001).
Differences in N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NTPBNP) between study groups from day 1 to 7.
Boxplots show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values, with outliers omitted for clarity. Differences are highly significant each day (p<0.001).General linear models showed that the level of metanephrin in the urine did not differ between the three study groups and was not influenced by the level of norepinephrine (arterenol) or dobutamin administered, and this was true for the day of admission, as well as days 30 and 180 of follow up. In contrast, the level of normetanephrin differed between TTC groups and was influenced by norepinephrine (arterenol) and dobutamin administration (Fig 4, S3 Table). The interaction between groups and norepinephrine (arterenol) or dobutamin were not significant, indicating that the effects of the drugs were similar in each group. The difference between study groups was marginally non-significant 30 days after the bleeding, partly due to a slight difference between the control and the mild TTC group and partly due to few data in the severe TTC group (Fig 4B, S3 Table). Finally, there was no difference in normetanephrin concentration between the study groups 180 days after the bleeding (GLM, F2,54 = 0.209, p = 0.812).
Fig 4
Urine normetanephrin levels on the day of admission (A) and 30 days later (B), and the effect of norepinephrine (arterenol) (C) and dobutamin (dobutrex) (D) on normetanephrin concentrations on the day of admission.
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means. Shaded areas in C and D indicate 95% confidence intervals. Note that the scales are different on the ordinates; on the day of admission (A), median normetanephrine concentration is 7-fold higher in the severe TTC group.
Urine normetanephrin levels on the day of admission (A) and 30 days later (B), and the effect of norepinephrine (arterenol) (C) and dobutamin (dobutrex) (D) on normetanephrin concentrations on the day of admission.
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means. Shaded areas in C and D indicate 95% confidence intervals. Note that the scales are different on the ordinates; on the day of admission (A), median normetanephrine concentration is 7-fold higher in the severe TTC group.
Changing the echocardiography parameters over time
The ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients with severe TTC than in non-TTC controls, and was intermediate but closer to level of controls in patients in patients with mild on both day 1 and 7 (Fig 5A–5D). These differences were marginally significant on day 30 and disappeared by day 180. Thus, ejection fraction improved stepwise in TTC patients during the follow-up period, but there were still signs of weak contractile function.
Fig 5
Differences in ejection fraction (%) (A-D) and wall motion score index (E-H) in the study groups on day 1, day 7, day 30 and day 180.
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots; jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means.
Differences in ejection fraction (%) (A-D) and wall motion score index (E-H) in the study groups on day 1, day 7, day 30 and day 180.
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots; jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means.The wall motion score index was highest in patients in the severe TTC group, and low in the mild TTC and control groups (Fig 5E–5H). The differences were significant on all study days, indicating that the difference could be detected even after 180 days.
Relationship between severity of TTC and mortality
By the end of the follow-up period (180 days), 70 (74.5%) patients survived in the control (non-TTC) group (n = 94), 22 (81.5%) survived in the mild TTC group (n = 27) and three (27%) survived in the severe TTC group (n = 11). The difference in mortality rate was significant (χ2 = 12.395, df = 2, p = 0.002). The number of deceased patients during different phases of follow up were as follows:Days 1–7: NoTTC group: n = 9; mild TTC: n = 2, severe TTC: n = 6Days 8–30: No TTC: n = 6; mild TTC: n = 3; severe TTC: n = 1Days 31–180: No TTC: n = 9; mild TTC: n = 0; severe TTC: n = 1
Relationship between the severity of TTC and the outcome of the patients
GOS, Barthel, and Karnofsky outcome scores were higher in patients in the control (non-TTC) and the mild TTC groups than in the severe TTC group (Fig 6). All the differences were significant, with the exception of the differences in Barthel scores during the second check-up (Fig 6E), indicating that severe TTC is associated with worse long-term clinical outcome of the patients.
Fig 6
Differences in GOS, Barthel and Karnofsky scores between study groups at the first check-up at 30 days (A-) and the second check-up at 180 days (D-F).
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots; jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means.
Differences in GOS, Barthel and Karnofsky scores between study groups at the first check-up at 30 days (A-) and the second check-up at 180 days (D-F).
Boxplots show datapoints (black dots; jittered and outliers omitted for clarity), median, upper and lower quartiles, and minimum and maximum values; red dots indicate means.
Discussion
The present report is among the first prospective studies assessing the incidence, predisposing factors and long-term clinical outcome of patients with TTC after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in a parallel, complex fashion. Our findings contribute to better understanding the natural history of TTC after aSAH and suggests a link between pathophysiological factors, clinical presentation of TTC and outcome parameters. As all aSAH patients were consecutively included, the reported incidence in our cohort reflects the real incidence of TTC according to recent recommendations. An important novelty is the systematic, prospective, long-term (180 days) follow up of the echocardiographic parameters in parallel with the cardiac biomarkers and time-collected urine catecholamine concentrations. Furthermore, based on the predefined ejection fraction threshold of 40%, we were able to define mild and severe forms of TTC in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage that showed a good relationship with long term outcome of the patients. We were the first demonstrating that cardiac wall motion abnormalities in severe TTC cases may persist for as long as 6 months after SAH onset.We found that cardiac wall motion disturbances can be detected in 28.7% of the cases. TTC may influence long-term mortality, and severe TTC may affect long term outcome. The prevalence of TTC varied in a wide range in previous reports, reaching up to 30% [5]. The differences could be, at least in part explained by developments in the definition of TTC over time: typical classical form of TTC was found in 2.2% of SAH patients in the study of Talahma [20], while others reported on 8.8% [9], 11% [10], 22% [21] and 27% [11] wall motion abnormalities. The reported incidence may have been influenced by the nature of the study (prospective or retrospective) and the timing and frequency of echocardiographic assessments. The prevalence of TTC in SAH may be underestimated by the majority of the studies [22] and prospective studies using regular echocardiography follow-up have been encouraged [15]. In the present study we included only patients in whom transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 hours after admission, and ECG and cardiac biomarkers were regularly checked on the daily basis. Whenever a significant ECG change was found, echocardiography was performed immediately, in addition to the day 1 and day 7 examinations. Therefore, we believe that the 28.7% incidence rate of TTC in our cohort reflects the true incidence of this condition; all cases of newly appearing wall motion abnormality were included. During the off-line analysis, we arbitrarily defined a mild and a severe group of TTC patients based on the ejection fraction; the predefined threshold of 40% was based on clinical experience that showed that below this level the cardiovascular status of the patients usually worsens and pharmacologic intervention is often necessary. Based on this grouping, we found the incidence of severe TTC 8.1% in SAH, which corresponds to the prevalence rates that have been published previously [9].In line with previous studies we also found that TTC in our cohort was more frequent in females than in males, and more severe cases were found among women. In two retrospective studies, the percentage of females were 100% [20] and 78% [5], respectively. In a prospective study of Kothavale et al. [22] the represantation of females was 68%. To explain these differences it is proposed that estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal women results in an increased sympathetic drive and endothelial dysfunction, making cardiac microcirculation more vulnerable during critical illnesses [23].In contrast to previous reports, we could not find any relationship between occurrence of TTC and any of the cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. This may be expained by a relatively high prevalence of the cardiovascular risk factors in the Hungarian general population.We found that the incidence of TTC was associated with modified Fisher scores and WFNS scores. Moreover, the severity of TTC was related to higher modified Fisher scores, Hunt&Hess scores, WFNS scores and GCS. This indicates that the more severe is the SAH at admission, the more severe TTC develops during the course of the disease. Similar observations were published by Talahma et al. [20]. Malik et al. also found a positive association between Hunt&Hess scores and left ventricular ejection fraction [24]. Kothavalet et al. [22] and Kilbourn et al. [25] found that Hunt&Hess grade 3–5 has a predictive value for the presence of regional wall motion abnormalities. It has to be noted, that in the present study binominal regression testing revealed that of the severity scores, only the modified Fisher score on admission was strongly associated with severity of TTC.Follow-up investigations of cardiac biomarkers showed that both cardiac troponin and NT-proBNP values were elevated from the day of admission both in the mild and the severe TTC groups. While troponin T and NT-proBNP levels tended to normalize in the mild group from day 3 on, in the severe group higher levels of these cardiac biomarkers persisted by day 7. The time pattern of the elevation of cardiac troponin is in line with previous observations [24, 26] confirming its high sensivity to detect left ventricular dysfunction in SAH. Although elevated serum BNP was significantly associated with regional wall motion abnormalities, it was not associated with 30- day mortality in previous studies [27, 28].It is widely accepted that catecholamines play a key role in the development of TTC. Elevation of plasma catecholamine (epinephrine and norepinephrine) concentrations are typical findings in patients with TTC [29-31]. At rest, the source of norepinephrine (NE) acting on the cardiac receptors is the andrenal medulla in 2–8% percent, and the rest is released by the sympathetic nerve endings [32]. In the acute phase of TTS, an increased concentration of circulating catecholamines, and an increased production of catecholamines at the myocardial level has been observed. Further, the density of the beta-2 receptors is higher in the apical than in the basal part of the ventricle, whereas beta1-adrenergic receptors are expressed predominantly at the base. A physiologic rise in the levels of epinephrine results in a switch of beta2-adrenoceptor coupling from Gs to Gi, in order to prevent the proapoptotic effect of the intense stimulation of the beta-1 adrenoceptors. Additionally, switching of the coupling mechanism leads to a negative inotropic effect on the apex of the left ventricle [33, 34]. Additionally, increased cardiac sympathetic activity may cause endothelial dysfunction and consequent coronary microvascular constriction, thus contributing to myocardial ischemia [23]. In accordance with these, in the present study we found that metanephrine concentration in the urine did not differ between TTC and non-TTC patients, whereas normetanephrine was elevated in patients with TTC at admission. This difference was missing at day 30 and day 180 of the follow up. Normetanephrine concentrations were not influenced by dobutamine or norepinephrine treatment. In line with these observations, Akashi et al. demonstrated an improvement of cardiac sympathetic hyperactivity in TCC patients using myocardial scintigraphy [35]. It is tempting to hypothetise that severe TTC itself, via the systemic effects of myocardial dysfunction, may contribute to the elevation of normetanephrin production and worsening of TTC as part of a vicious circle. However, our data are insufficient to confirm this.Per definition, wall motion abnormalities are temporary in patients with TTC and show and improvement over time along with the ejection fraction of the heart. Kim and co-workers demonstrated an improvement of the ejection fraction from 38%, to 61% during a 6 week follow-up [36]. In a study of Templin et al. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (mean value: 40.7) was found in 86.5% of patients with TTC, which showed a recovery over time during a 60-day follow-up [37]. Similarly, Dias et el. reported on an improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction from the intial 32.1% to 54% in a 6-month follow up study. [38]. The EF tended to normalize in mild cases, while in the severe TTC group low EF persisted at 7 days. Although at 30 days statistically significant differences between the TTC groups compared to non-TTC groups could not be demonstrated, it has to be noted that EF was still lower in severe cases and the lack of statistical difference might be explaned by the relatively small sample size. Importantly, wall motion score index differences persisted over 180 days in the severe TTC group, indicating that the contractile function of the heart may not entirely recover at 6 months, despite normalization of the global left ventricular ejection fraction.The severity of TTC in our cohort significantly affected the outcome and mortality of the patients during the 180 days follow-up. The mortality at 6 months was significantly higher among patients with severe TTC whereas the mortality in mild TTC cases was comparable with that of non-TTC subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. The mortality of the present study (33.3%) is lower than that in the study of Kilbourn (47%) [25], buth slightly higher that reported by Talahma (28%) [20] and Abd (26%) [39]. In those who were alive at the day 180 follow-up, both Glasgow outcome scores and Karnovsky scores were significantly lower in the severe compared to the mild TTC group. Barthel’s index reflected worse outcome in the severe TTC group only at 30 days in the present study. There are only few studies that have assessed long-term outcome of TTC. Similarly to our results, Crago et al. demonstrated differences in Barthel’s index at 30 days but not at 60 days in TCC patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage [40]. Mutoh et al. reported on poor 3-month functional outcome as assessed by modified Rankin Scale in TTC patients with an EF <40% [41].We have to mention some limitations of our study. This was a single center follow-up study with an inclusion period of 22 months and as a consequence, the number of included patients is limited. We may also be criticized for the follow-up of vasospasm with transcranial color-coded duplex sonography. In fact, the vasospasm may be accurately diagnosed by angiography, but we decided to perform a regular TCCD check of the blood flow velocities. If clinical and/or ultrasonographic signs of vasospasm were found, cerebral angiography was performed. We did not measure the blood levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine because we belive that sampling blood for these parameters would represent a rapidly changing snapshot, while urine metanephrine and normetanephrine in 24 hour collected urine may be more representative of the tissue exposure to these hormones. Finally, we arbitrarily defined mild and severe forms of TTC during analysis of the results based on ejection fraction. The rationale behind this dichotomization was that previous reports indicated that the critical threshold of ejection fraction that determines cardiovascular complications and long-term outcome lies between 40–45% [37].
Conclusion
We found that Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a frequent phenomenon occurring in patients with aneurysmal subrachnoid hemorrhage, and severe TTC is present in 8% of SAH cases. The incidence of SAH is associated with the modified Fisher and WFNS scores at admission. The severity of TTC may may be an independent predictor of mortality and outcome at 6 months after disease onset. Systematic and regular follow-up of ECG and echocardiographic abnormalities is warranted in patients with subrachnoid hemorrhage for early detection of TTC. Further studies are required to identify the best treatment approach to the cardiac changes which may accompany SAH.
Occurrence of TTC by comorbidities of the patients.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Severity of TTC by comorbidities of the patients.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Results of general linear models testing the differences in normetenephrin concentration between study groups and the effect of arterenol and dobutrex on normetanephrin concentration on days 1 and 30.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.8 Mar 2022
PONE-D-21-36989
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Patients Suffering From Acute Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - a Single Center Follow-up Study
PLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Fülesdi,Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. First of all, I deeply apologize for this long reviewing process. I was waiting for a delayed review (reviewer 2) but decided to move forward.Your paper was reviewed by an expert in the field and myself. As shown in the reviewer's comments, your study was well performed, and paper was well written. However, numerous numbers of papers were already published on this topic. I am aware of this journal's policy (i.e., novelty and clinical significance should not be judged) but please try to add some unique features in your study.Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 16 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.Kind regards,Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D.Academic EditorPLOS ONEJournal Requirements:When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found athttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf andhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:Hungarian Brain research program [grant number KTIA_13_NAP-A-II/5], the founder is the Hungarian Academy of SciencesWe note that you have provided additional information within the Acknowledgements Section that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.7. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]Reviewers' comments:Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes********** 5. Review Comments to the AuthorPlease use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This single center, prospective study was well conducted, and its results (frequency, identification of risk factors, measurement of cardiac biomarkers, outcome predictability etc.) were consistent with those of previous studies. It should be noted, however, that there have been numerous studies on the clinical characteristics of SAH-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and this study is just one of them. Few novel findings were derived from this study, except that long-term echocardiographic follow-up had been conducted.********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
29 Apr 2022Comments from the editorial office• Funding: Hungarian Brain research program [grant number KTIA_13_NAP-A-II/5], the founder is the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.• Data availability: In the declarations section we stated: „all available material (including raw data and statistical analysis will be made available upon request from the corresponding author.”• phrase “data not shown”: we delated this part from the text as suggested.• Supporting Information files: we included them at the end of the manuscript, as suggested.Reviewer and editor’s comment• Novelty of the study as compared to previous reports. Thank you for this comment. For sake of clarity we added a section to the discussion section that is intended to point out the novelties of the present study. This part of the discussion sections reads now as follows: „The present report is among the first prospective studies assessing the incidence, predisposing factors and long-term clinical outcome of patients with TTC after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in a parallel, complex fashion. Our findings contribute to better understanding the natural history of TTC after aSAH and suggests a link between pathophysiological factors, clinical presentation of TTC and outcome parameters. As all aSAH patients were consecutively included, the reported incidence in our cohort reflects the real incidence of TTC according to recent recommendations. An important novelty is the systematic, prospective, long-term (180 days) follow up of the echocardiographic parameters in parallel with the cardiac biomarkers and time-collected urine catecholamine concentrations. Furthermore, based on the predefined ejection fraction threshold of 40%, we were able to define mild and severe forms of TTC in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage that showed a good relationship with long term outcome of the patients. We were the first demonstrating that cardiac wall motion abnormalities in severe TTC cases may persist for as long as 6 months after SAH onset.”Again, thank you very much for the thorough review process and for your suggestions. We hope that in its present form the manuscript will meet the requirements of the journal.Submitted filename: Response, revision.docxClick here for additional data file.4 May 2022Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Patients Suffering From Acute Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - a Single Center Follow-up StudyPONE-D-21-36989R1Dear Dr. Fülesdi,We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.Kind regards,Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D.Academic EditorPLOS ONEAdditional Editor Comments (optional):Reviewers' comments:16 May 2022PONE-D-21-36989R1Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Patients Suffering From Acute Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - a Single Center Follow-up StudyDear Dr. Fülesdi:I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.Kind regards,PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staffon behalf ofDr. Tomohiko AiAcademic EditorPLOS ONE
Authors: Andre Dias; Ivan J Núñez Gil; Francesco Santoro; John E Madias; Francesco Pelliccia; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Scott W Sharkey; Ingo Eitel; Yoshihiro J Akashi; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Emiliana Franco; Ibrahim Akin; Milosz Jaguszewski; Dana Dawson; Vincent M Figueredo; L Christian Napp; Thomas Emil Christensen; Kathy Hebert; Itsik Ben-Dor; Yuichi Ozaki; Héctor M García-Garcia; Alexandre H Kajita; Takashi Akasaka; Satoshi Kurisu; Amir Lerman; Ron Waksman Journal: Cardiovasc Revasc Med Date: 2018-11-17
Authors: Ilan S Wittstein; David R Thiemann; Joao A C Lima; Kenneth L Baughman; Steven P Schulman; Gary Gerstenblith; Katherine C Wu; Jeffrey J Rade; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Hunter C Champion Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard E Temes; Elena Tessitore; J Michael Schmidt; Andrew M Naidech; Andres Fernandez; Noeleen D Ostapkovich; Jennifer A Frontera; Katja E Wartenberg; Marco R Di Tullio; Neeraj Badjatia; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer; Augusto Parra Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Christian Templin; Jelena R Ghadri; Johanna Diekmann; L Christian Napp; Dana R Bataiosu; Milosz Jaguszewski; Victoria L Cammann; Annahita Sarcon; Verena Geyer; Catharina A Neumann; Burkhardt Seifert; Jens Hellermann; Moritz Schwyzer; Katharina Eisenhardt; Josef Jenewein; Jennifer Franke; Hugo A Katus; Christof Burgdorf; Heribert Schunkert; Christian Moeller; Holger Thiele; Johann Bauersachs; Carsten Tschöpe; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Charles A Laney; Lawrence Rajan; Guido Michels; Roman Pfister; Christian Ukena; Michael Böhm; Raimund Erbel; Alessandro Cuneo; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Claudius Jacobshagen; Gerd Hasenfuss; Mahir Karakas; Wolfgang Koenig; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Samir M Said; Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus; Florim Cuculi; Adrian Banning; Thomas A Fischer; Tuija Vasankari; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Marcin Fijalkowski; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Maciej Pawlak; Grzegorz Opolski; Rafal Dworakowski; Philip MacCarthy; Christoph Kaiser; Stefan Osswald; Leonarda Galiuto; Filippo Crea; Wolfgang Dichtl; Wolfgang M Franz; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix; Clément Delmas; Olivier Lairez; Paul Erne; Jeroen J Bax; Ian Ford; Frank Ruschitzka; Abhiram Prasad; Thomas F Lüscher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245