Literature DB >> 35616712

Emotions in motion: affective valence can influence compatibility effects with graspable objects.

Elisa Scerrati1, Sandro Rubichi2,3, Roberto Nicoletti4, Cristina Iani3,5.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed that affective valence (positive, negative) influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility (SRC) effects elicited by both relevant and irrelevant spatial dimensions. We tested whether valence influences SRC effects when the irrelevant spatial dimension rather than being conveyed by the entire stimulus location is conveyed by the location of the stimulus' graspable part, i.e., the Handle-Response (H-R) compatibility effect. Participants saw objects with either a flower, a spider or nothing on their handle and categorized them as kitchen utensils or garage tools through button presses. In Experiment 1, a random presentation of valenced stimuli was used, whereas in Experiment 2 differently valenced stimuli were arranged in different blocks. Furthermore, participants in Experiment 2 could be spider-fearful or not. In Experiment 1, an H-R compatibility effect occurred for response latencies, regardless of whether stimuli presented a negative, positive or no element on their handle. In Experiment 2 the effect occurred only when a positive element was shown on the object's handle. In addition, spider-fearful individuals showed significantly slower responses when the element appearing on the object's handle had a negative valence. These results suggest that the SRC effect observed with pictures of graspable objects may be sensitive to the affective characteristics of stimuli and that approach/avoidance response tendencies may also depend on individual differences (being spider-fearful or not).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35616712     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01688-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing.

Authors:  M M Bradley; M Codispoti; B N Cuthbert; P J Lang
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2001-09

2.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?

Authors:  Dongbin Tobin Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Marc Sato; Luigi Cattaneo; Francesca Rodà; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions.

Authors:  Dongbin Tobin Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding.

Authors:  Dongbin Tobin Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-10-26

7.  Grasping the pain: motor resonance with dangerous affordances.

Authors:  Filomena Anelli; Anna M Borghi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-10-05

8.  Editorial: Hand and Touch: Evolution, Ability, and Preference.

Authors:  Jacqueline Fagard; Miriam Ittyerah
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-01

9.  Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.

Authors:  Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine; Jessica Massonnié; Adam Flitton; Natasha Kirkham; Jo K Evershed
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

10.  Keep away from danger: dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations.

Authors:  Filomena Anelli; Roberto Nicoletti; Roberto Bolzani; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does a look of fear prompt to act? The effects of gaze and face emotional expression on manipulable objects.

Authors:  Elisa Scerrati; Sandro Rubichi; Cristina Iani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

2.  Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias.

Authors:  Kinga Wołoszyn; Mateusz Hohol; Michał Kuniecki; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.