Literature DB >> 35616398

Rapid Detection of MCR-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Escherichia coli.

Haijie Zhang1, Feiyu Yu1, Xiaoyu Lu1, Yan Li1, Daxin Peng1, Zhiqiang Wang1,2,3, Yuan Liu1,2,4,3.   

Abstract

Colistin is one of the last-resort antibiotics for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, the wide spread of novel plasmid-carrying colistin resistance genes mcr-1 and its variants substantially compromise colistin's therapeutic effectiveness and pose a severe danger to public health. To detect colistin-resistant microorganisms induced by mcr genes, rapid and reliable antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is imminently needed. In this study, we identified an RNA-based AST (RBAST) to discriminate between colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant bacteria. After short-time colistin treatment, RBAST can detect differentially expressed RNA biomarkers in bacteria. Those candidate mRNA biomarkers were successfully verified within colistin exposure temporal shifts, concentration shifts, and other mcr-1 variants. Furthermore, a group of clinical strains were effectively distinguished by using the RBAST approach during the 3-h test duration with over 93% accuracy. Taken together, our findings imply that certain mRNA transcripts produced in response to colistin treatment might be useful indicators for the development of fast AST for mcr-positive bacteria. IMPORTANCE The emergence and prevalence of mcr-1 and its variants in humans, animals, and the environment pose a global public health threat. There is a pressing urgency to develop rapid and accurate methods to identify MCR-positive colistin-resistant bacteria in the clinical samples, providing a basis for subsequent effective antibiotic treatment. Using the specific mRNA signatures, we develop an RNA-based antibiotic susceptibility testing (RBAST) for effectively distinguishing colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant strains. Meanwhile, the detection efficiency of these RNA biomarkers was evidenced in other mcr variants-carrying strains. By comparing with the traditional AST method, the RBAST method was verified to successfully characterize a set of clinical isolates during 3 h assay time with over 93% accuracy. Our study provides a feasible method for the rapid detection of colistin-resistant strains in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic resistance; antibiotic susceptibility determination; colistin; mRNA biomarker; mcr-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35616398      PMCID: PMC9241874          DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00920-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Spectr        ISSN: 2165-0497


INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics have saved thousands of lives in recent decades. However, antibiotic resistance has been rising as a result of the overuse and abuse of antibiotics in clinical, agricultural, or other settings (1). If not controlled, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will cost the world economy more than 210 trillion dollars, with 10 million people dying each year from AMR infections (https://amr-review.org/). Colistin, a member of cationic polypeptide antibiotics, is considered as one of the final effective therapeutic options for carbapenems-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infected patients (2, 3). The emergence and prevalence of bacterial resistance to this antibiotic have been increasing rapidly due to the wide use of colistin in animal feeding and plant agriculture, as well as human medicine. Since the first mcr-1 gene located in the plasmid was identified in a pig-source E. coli in 2015 (4), mcr-1-conferred colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae has been documented in humans, animals, and the environment all over the world. MCR-1 belongs to the phosphoethanolamine (PEA) transferase enzyme family that can add PEA to lipid A when expressed in E. coli (5). Given the fact that the antibacterial mechanism of colistin is based on electrostatic interaction between its amino groups and lipid A subunits of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), MCR expression reduces LPS's net charge, resulting in detectable colistin resistance (6, 7). To present, 10 different mcr-1 variants (mcr-1–mcr-10) have been identified in bacteria isolated from humans, animals, foods, and the environment (8). Since the first discovery of the coexistence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and mcr-1 in an E. coli isolate (9), the whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis further revealed a growing trend of ESBL and mcr-1 coexistence and transmission in human and veterinary medicine (10). Moreover, Feng et al. identified an E. coli isolate with a single plasmid carrying both the tet(X6) and mcr-1 genes, which confers coresistance to both colistin and tigecycline (11). To detect colistin-resistant E. coli mediated by mcr genes, rapid and reliable antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is essential. Disk diffusion, broth dilution, and commercially accessible semi-automated systems are the most often utilized AST techniques in clinical practices. Despite being cost-effective and accurate, traditional AST is time-consuming and labor-intensive, with a wait time of approximately 24 h (12). Commercial automated methods like MicroScan WalkAway, Vitek-2, BD PhoenixTM, and SensititreTM are now routinely utilized in clinical practice, reducing AST time from 6 to 16 h and challenging the boundaries of bacterial diagnosis (13). While next-generation sequencing has reduced the cost and quantity of testing known resistance genes, it is also a separate detection of genotype and phenotype (14). Quantitative analysis of antibiotic-responsive RNA responses may quickly distinguish the resistant pathogen strains, independent of resistance mechanisms or genetic background (15). Accordingly, RNA-based transcriptional changes have been applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility in a variety of strains including Enterobacteriaceae (16–19). Quantifying changes in RNA signatures following antibiotic treatment is particularly promising for rapid AST. In the current study, on the basis of bacterium-antibiotic model systems, we developed a quick and accurate RNA-based test for identifying both mcr-1-positive and colistin-resistant bacteria. After 60 min of colistin exposure, this rapid AST method was developed based on the significant differences in transcriptome responses between the colistin-susceptible strain (DH5α-pUC19) and the colistin-resistant strain (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1). The candidate RNA markers were verified using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) temporal and colistin concentration shifts, and correlated with traditional AST. Following colistin exposure, the potential RNA markers were further validated in other mcr-1 variants and clinical isolates.

RESULTS

Different transcriptome responses between colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant bacteria.

To identify the specific RNA transcripts capable of distinguishing colistin-susceptible and -resistant bacteria, RNA sequencing was used to compare the transcriptional profiles between the reference colistin-susceptible strain (DH5-pUC19) and mcr-1 positive colistin-resistant strain (DH5-pUC19-mcr-1) treated with colistin at a breakpoint concentration for 60 min. Interestingly, we found that colistin-susceptible and -resistant strains displayed different transcriptional responses to 2 μg/mL colistin exposure. As shown in Fig. 1A and B, upon colistin treatment, 562 genes were upregulated and 451 genes were downregulated in DH5-pUC19. By comparison, the DH5-pUC19-mcr-1 group had 443 upregulated genes and 283 downregulated genes. There were 263 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in both upregulated groups and 133 DEGs in the downregulated groups (Fig. 1C). Compared with the DH5-pUC19-mcr-1 group, more DEGs were observed in mcr-1 negative groups after colistin exposure. Furthermore, the significantly changed genes (Log2FC ≥ 2 or ≤ −2, P ≤ 0.05, ANOVA) were selected for additional confirmation. Principal-component analysis (PCA) results demonstrated a similar change direction between colistin susceptible and mcr-1 positive groups after colistin exposure, but with a totally different location (Fig. 1D).
FIG 1

Differential gene expression of mcr-1-negative and -positive strains under colistin exposure. (A and B) Volcano illustration of differentially expressed genes from colistin treatment samples of colistin susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) strains relative to their control groups. Upregulated genes are indicated by red points (Log2FC ≥ 2 and P < 0.05), and downregulated genes are indicated by blue points (Log2FC ≤ −2 and P < 0.05). (C) Venn diagrams show the number of mRNA biomarkers expression significantly altered by colistin susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) after colistin exposure. FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05 and Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (one-way ANOVA). (D) Principal-component analysis (PCA) score plots for transcriptional levels from samples colistin-susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and -resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) with or without colistin treatment.

Differential gene expression of mcr-1-negative and -positive strains under colistin exposure. (A and B) Volcano illustration of differentially expressed genes from colistin treatment samples of colistin susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) strains relative to their control groups. Upregulated genes are indicated by red points (Log2FC ≥ 2 and P < 0.05), and downregulated genes are indicated by blue points (Log2FC ≤ −2 and P < 0.05). (C) Venn diagrams show the number of mRNA biomarkers expression significantly altered by colistin susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) after colistin exposure. FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05 and Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (one-way ANOVA). (D) Principal-component analysis (PCA) score plots for transcriptional levels from samples colistin-susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) and -resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) with or without colistin treatment.

Functional enrichment of DEGs.

A universal gene ontology (GO) analysis pathway was annotated for functional annotation to further comprehend the functional enrichment of transcriptome results (Fig. 2). The results revealed that the mRNA expression of genes involved in pilus production and adhesion was significantly increased. The antibacterial activity of colistin is dependent on the electrostatic contact between the positively charged colistin and the negatively charged phosphate group of lipid A on LPS located on the bacterial outer membrane. After diffusing through the periplasm from the outer membrane, colistin can intercalate into the inner membrane and produce holes, leading to bacterial lysis. In line with colistin's mechanisms of action, the transcription levels of the outer membrane, porin, and channel activity-related genes were remarkably upregulated. Furthermore, we found that colistin-specific susceptibility genes were enriched in cellular respiration, ATPase activity, ethanolamine metabolic process, and energy derivation by oxidation in DH5α-pUC19 downregulated group (Fig. 2A and B), while genes related to uracil and tryptophan metabolic process and nitrogen utilization were enriched in DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1 downregulated groups (Fig. 2C and D). These results suggest that colistin-susceptible strains display different changes compared with mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant groups after treatment with colistin at breakpoint concentration (2 μg/mL).
FIG 2

Gene ontology (GO) pathway enrichment of differentially expressed genes after colistin treatment. GO pathway enrichment in colistin-susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) (A and B) and -resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) strains (C and D) after colistin treatment relative to their control groups. FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05 and Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (one-way ANOVA).

Gene ontology (GO) pathway enrichment of differentially expressed genes after colistin treatment. GO pathway enrichment in colistin-susceptible (DH5α-pUC19) (A and B) and -resistant (DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1) strains (C and D) after colistin treatment relative to their control groups. FDR < 0.05, P < 0.05 and Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (one-way ANOVA).

Selection of candidate RNA biomarkers for fast AST.

Genes with a substantial increase or reduction in DH5α-pUC19, but no significant change in DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1, were included in the putative colistin-specific susceptibility gene list. A minimum Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (P < 0.05) was required as a significant change in transcriptome profiles and sorted by P value. The first-step candidates are shown in Table S3 in the supplemental material. With regard to RT-qPCR-based verification of mRNA biomarkers for a fast molecular AST, three colistin-susceptible and three mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant E. coli isolates with clear backgrounds were utilized. A minimum ΔΔCT value ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 was identified as “significantly differential” in quantitative analysis using RT-qPCR analysis with optimized primers (Table S4). According to Fig. 3 and Fig. S1, 18 of 94 candidate mRNA biomarkers showed significantly differential expression levels between colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated groups after colistin treatment. In particular, 12 (yhcN, wzc, pstS, soxS, ycfJ, lgoR, yebO, rhsB, pstC, emrA, lysA, and yfdX) of 18 genes examined were determined as highly upregulated mRNA biomarkers in all three susceptible isolates, but none in the three mcr-1 positive isolates. Furthermore, only six mRNA biomarkers (motA, ddpB, gadA, hyaC, gadC and treB) were found to be significantly downregulated in colistin-susceptible isolates, whereas no change in the three mcr-1 positive isolates.
FIG 3

RBAST distinguishes colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-conferred colistin-resistant strains. Heatmap of 18 RNA biomarkers in colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolate after colistin treatment relative to their control groups. Left black panels represent colistin-susceptible isolates, and right gray panels represent mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolates. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

RBAST distinguishes colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-conferred colistin-resistant strains. Heatmap of 18 RNA biomarkers in colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolate after colistin treatment relative to their control groups. Left black panels represent colistin-susceptible isolates, and right gray panels represent mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolates. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

Colistin concentration shifts in candidate mRNA biomarkers upon colistin treatment.

In this study, 18 candidate RNA biomarkers were identified between colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolates after exposure to 2 μg/mL colistin, and the potential of these mRNA profiles as detection biomarkers to be affected by changes in colistin concentration was further investigated. E. coli ATCC25922 and an mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant clinical E. coli strain were treated with different concentrations of colistin ranging from 0.03125 to 32 μg/mL. After a 60-minute colistin treatment, bacterial RNA was collected and the putative 18 mRNA biomarkers were quantified by RT-qPCR analysis. Three genes in particular, yhcN, wzc, and ycfJ, exhibited a dose-dependent increase in regulation as long as colistin concentrations were high enough (Fig. 4A to C; Fig. S2A to C). Candidate mRNA biomarkers were considerably upregulated in ATCC25922 when the colistin concentration reached 0.25 μg/mL, which corresponded to the MIC value of ATCC25922, but no change was seen in the mcr-1 positive isolate. When the colistin concentration approached 2 μg/mL, equivalent to the MICs of the mcr-1 positive isolates, the expression levels of putative mRNA biomarkers in the mcr-1 positive isolate exhibited a similar response as the susceptible isolate. These findings illustrate that exposure to colistin at breakpoint concentrations may be used to discover distinct mRNA biomarkers that can distinguish colistin-sensitive isolates from mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant bacteria.
FIG 4

Expression levels of selected RNA biomarkers under different colistin treatment concentrations and times. (A–C) Heatmap of the expression of yhcN (A), wzc (B), and rplE (C) markers in colistin-susceptible and -resistant strains under different colistin concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 32 μg/mL. (D and E) Heatmap of the expression of 18 differentially expressed RNA biomarkers in colistin-susceptible (D) and -resistant (E) strain under different colistin exposure durations. Black panels represent the colistin-susceptible strain and gray panels represent an mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolate. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

Expression levels of selected RNA biomarkers under different colistin treatment concentrations and times. (A–C) Heatmap of the expression of yhcN (A), wzc (B), and rplE (C) markers in colistin-susceptible and -resistant strains under different colistin concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 32 μg/mL. (D and E) Heatmap of the expression of 18 differentially expressed RNA biomarkers in colistin-susceptible (D) and -resistant (E) strain under different colistin exposure durations. Black panels represent the colistin-susceptible strain and gray panels represent an mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant isolate. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

Temporal shifts in candidate mRNA biomarkers upon colistin treatment.

The influence of varied incubation durations on the expression levels of putative mRNA biomarkers was further explored. E. coli ATCC25922 and an mcr-1-medicated colistin-resistant clinical E. coli strain were treated with 2 μg/mL colistin for 5 to 120 min. A global shift of 18 potential mRNA biomarkers in ATCC25922 was raised in a relatively short period (10 min), and peaked at around 60 min following colistin treatment, as illustrated in Fig. 4D and E and Fig. S3. However, up to 120 min after colistin administration, there was no significant change in the expression of potential mRNA biomarkers in mcr-1 positive groups. These findings imply that these putative mRNA biomarkers are responsive to colistin treatment, allowing for quick recognition of mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant E. coli.

Validation of candidate mRNA biomarkers in mcr-1 variants.

The CDS of nine mcr variants (mcr-2–mcr-10) obtained from the NCBI database were cloned into pET23a(+) and transformed into BL21(DE3) to determine if these candidate biomarkers can be utilized to detect colistin-resistant E. coli strains produced by other mcr variants. All of the constructs had a low-level colistin resistance phenotype (MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL). After colistin exposure, the expression levels of putative mRNA biomarkers of different mcr-1 variants were similar to the mcr-1 positive groups (Fig. 5 and Fig. S4). These findings imply that the potential mRNA biomarkers can be used for the quick molecular AST of colistin-resistant E. coli isolates mediated by mcr-1 and mcr variants.
FIG 5

RBAST detects different variants of mcr-1 using the candidate RNA biomarkers. Heatmap of 18 differentially expressed RNA biomarkers validation across colistin-susceptible and engineered colistin-resistance strains mediated by different variants of mcr-1 after colistin exposure relative to their control groups. Black panels represent susceptible E. coli, and gray panels represent the construction of different variants of mcr-1. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

RBAST detects different variants of mcr-1 using the candidate RNA biomarkers. Heatmap of 18 differentially expressed RNA biomarkers validation across colistin-susceptible and engineered colistin-resistance strains mediated by different variants of mcr-1 after colistin exposure relative to their control groups. Black panels represent susceptible E. coli, and gray panels represent the construction of different variants of mcr-1. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

Accuracy of RBAST in clinical isolates.

Thirty clinical E. coli isolates randomly selected were tested for RT-qPCR-based confirmation and MIC correction to further verify the accuracy and possible applicability of RBAST. For higher accuracy, a minimum Log2FC ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 (P < 0.05), and up- or downregulation of at least 16/18 of selected RNA biomarkers were defined as “colistin susceptible” in quantitative analysis using RT-qPCR. On the contrary, at least 16/18 of selected mRNA biomarkers of −2 ≤ ΔΔCT ≤ 2 were needed as no significantly differential regulation and defined as “mcr mediated-colistin resistance.” The results of RBAST were compared with traditional MIC tests (Fig. 6 and Fig. S5). According to the RT-qPCR results, 17/30 isolates were defined as “colistin resistance” and 13/30 as ‘’colistin susceptible.” Compared with the MIC results, the RBAST correctly classified 28 of 30 strains (95% categorical agreement), including all 15 colistin susceptible isolates and 13 of 15 resistant isolates, with over 93% accuracy. These results suggest that the RBAST can efficiently distinguish mcr-mediated colistin resistance in the clinical situation.
FIG 6

RBAST accurately identifies the susceptibility of E. coli clinical isolates to colistin. Heatmap of 18 selected RNA biomarkers across clinical isolates including colistin-susceptible (A) and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant E. coli (B) after colistin exposure relative to their untreated groups. Black panels represent colistin-susceptible isolates, and gray panels represent mcr-1-medicated colistin-resistant isolates. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

RBAST accurately identifies the susceptibility of E. coli clinical isolates to colistin. Heatmap of 18 selected RNA biomarkers across clinical isolates including colistin-susceptible (A) and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant E. coli (B) after colistin exposure relative to their untreated groups. Black panels represent colistin-susceptible isolates, and gray panels represent mcr-1-medicated colistin-resistant isolates. 16s rRNA was employed as a reference gene.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence and wide spread of mcr-1 and its variants in humans, animals, and environmental niches calls for more effective AST methods for deploying effective therapeutic regimens. In this research, the transcriptome results of DH5α-pUC19 and DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1 after treatment with colistin were characterized, and we found that colistin-susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant strains displayed different RNA transcripts in some biological functions. Utilizing the differences in mRNA expression between colistin-susceptible and mcr-1 positive isolates, we constructed a quick and effective AST method called RBAST for assessing colistin susceptibility in bacterial strains. Traditional AMR detection methods, such as growth-dependent assays, are currently widely used, but most of them require preliminary bacterial isolation, enrichment, and identification steps by culturing in the presence and absence of the relevant antibiotic, which is time-consuming and may delay appropriate antibiotic treatment (20, 21). Several detection approaches have been developed in recent years to improve AST efficiency by shortening the time necessary for isolation, enrichment, or susceptibility determination (22, 23). However, some economic and technical limitations of these methods still limit their clinical translation. For example, high-throughput genotypic detection of mcr-1 using PCR has high efficiency and sensitivity, but due to a lack of universal primers for each variant, it cannot discover unknown resistance genes (24–26). Additionally, Dekker et al. developed an approach to detect mcr-1-containing isolates by characterizing MCR-1 tryptic peptides after protein extraction based on triple quadrupole LC–MS, but this needs a complex sample pretreatment process and intricate analysis of tryptic peptides to MCR-1 (27). Alternative approaches have also been developed, such as nucleic acid-based ASTs, which are performed by utilizing qPCR to determine the number of copies of bacterial chromosomal DNA (28). However, these growth rate-dependent assays are time-consuming, and cannot be corrected by MIC value. On the contrary, a rapid molecular AST based on the candidate RNA biomarkers can yield a rapid and accurate response following short-time antibiotic exposure. For example, a recent report supported that RNA transcripts can be used for rapid detection of ciprofloxacin-resistant Y. pestis and universal antibiotic susceptibility identification of 24 different antibiotics (20, 29). Similarly, RNA biomarkers have been used to aid in the diagnosis of various disorders such as cancer, Parkinson's disease, and other infections (30–32). More generally, when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics at the breakpoint concentrations, the mRNA transcriptome profiles of antibiotics-susceptible and resistant isolates change dramatically (17, 33, 34). For example, in a previous study of tet(X4)-mediated tigecycline-resistant bacteria, we found only 40 upregulated genes in the tet(X4)-positive group, compared to 410 in the tigecycline susceptible group, indicating that the transcriptome of the tet(X4)-positive group did not respond significantly to tigecycline exposure (35). However, in the current study, once exposed to 2 μg/mL colistin, similar DEGs were sorted out between colistin susceptible and mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant positive groups. Additionally, two groups displayed some similar GO analysis results, including the increased expression of synthesis of pilus, outer membrane, porin, and channel activity-related genes. We suppose that this may be due to the low-level colistin resistance caused by MCR-1, and the treatment with 2 μg/mL colistin poses a considerable burden for mcr-1 positive groups, leading to more DEGs. Many investigations have consistently demonstrated that the mcr-1 gene induces low-level resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with MIC values ranging from 2 to 8 μg/mL (4, 36). In summary, we developed a quick and comprehensive molecular AST by assessing the fold changes in candidate mRNA biomarkers expression following colistin exposure to distinguish colistin-susceptible from colistin-resistant isolates. The candidate mRNA biomarkers are successfully verified across colistin exposure temporal and concentration shifts in E. coli isolates. The accuracy of colistin susceptibility determination based on the candidate mRNA biomarkers compared with traditional MIC is over 93%. Moreover, the RBAST has been verified and can be extended to examine other pathogens that carry mcr variants. Nevertheless, mRNA-based AST can only identify susceptibility categories, not accurate MIC values (20), and requires substantial additional work to yield clinically viable diagnostic protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains.

E. coli DH5α was utilized as a reference strain in this study. Clinical colistin-resistant E. coli used in the following experiments were isolated from Père David's Deer (Elaphurus davidianus or milu) (37), available as Table S1, and preserved in the College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, China.

Plasmids and strains construction.

The standard mcr-1 gene with its promoter was amplified by PCR using KeyPo Master Mix (Vazyme, China), and cloned into pUC19 using a restriction enzyme site, XbaI, and EcoRI. Other complete coding DNA sequences (CDS) of mcr variants were amplified from synthetic gene sequences based on sequences published in NCBI or genomic template and inserted into pET23(a) after T7 promoter using NdeI and BamHI. The primers are shown in Table S2. The produced plasmid named pUC19-mcr-1 was transformed into DH5α, and other mcr-1 variants in pET23(a) were transformed into BL21(DE3). E. coli DH5α-pUC19-mcr-1 and DH5α-pUC19 were engineered as standard colistin-susceptible and -resistant strains.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The broth microdilution method was performed to determine the MICs of colistin (CST), aztreonam (ATM), amoxicillin (AMC), ceftiofur (CFF), doxycycline (DOX), enrofloxacin (ENR), florfenicol (FFC), meropenem (MEM), and streptomycin (STR) for all clinical E. coli isolates, and the results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. MIC values of more than 2 μg/mL were used to characterize colistin-resistant strains.

Colistin treatment for sequencing and RNA extraction.

The colistin-resistant strain (DH5-pUC19-mcr-1) and the colistin-susceptible strain (DH5-pUC19) were grown at 37°C in LB broth with 100 μg/mL ampicillin to OD600 ≈ 1. The incubations were separated into two groups: the treated group received 2 μg/mL colistin incubated at 37°C for 60 min, whereas the control group received no treatment. After stimulation, the supernatants were removed by centrifugation and samples were chilled in liquid nitrogen for 15 min. TRIzol Reagent was used to extract bacterial RNA according to the manufacturer's instructions (InvitroGen, Carlsbad, CA).

RNA sequencing and data processing.

An RNA-seq transcriptome library with 2 μg of total RNA was performed using Illumina's TruSeqTM RNA sample preparation kit (San Diego, CA). Then, random hexamer primers (Illumina) were used to synthesize double-stranded cDNA using a SuperScript double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Illumina). The library was sequenced by the Illumina HiSeq × 10 (2 × 150 bp read length) after being quantified by TBS380 and processed by Illumina GA Pipeline (version 1.6), yielding 150 bp paired-end reads. The reads were aligned to the E. coli K12 strain (NCBI reference sequence: NC_000913.3). XLSTAT software (2015 version, Addinsoft) was used for the principal-component analysis (PCA).

Validation of selected RNA biomarker expressions.

The same protocols provided in 2.4 were performed for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) validation. MiPure Cell/Tissue miRNA Kit (Vazyme) was used to collect and extract samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme) was used for validation of RNA biomarker expressions. Primers shown in Table S4 were designed to validate candidate genes using Primer Premier 5.1. A relative quantitative method was applied to calculate the fold changes (log2FC=-ΔΔCT) of mRNA expression relative to the reference genes (16S rRNA).

Data availability.

RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (PRJNA830332).
  37 in total

1.  Optimization of a nucleic acid-based reporter system to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis antibiotic sensitivity.

Authors:  Matthew C Mulvey; Margaret Lemmon; Stephanie Rotter; Jonathan Lees; Leo Einck; Carol A Nacy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Progress on the development of rapid methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Marina R Pulido; Meritxell García-Quintanilla; Reyes Martín-Peña; José Miguel Cisneros; Michael J McConnell
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Better tests, better care: improved diagnostics for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Angela M Caliendo; David N Gilbert; Christine C Ginocchio; Kimberly E Hanson; Larissa May; Thomas C Quinn; Fred C Tenover; David Alland; Anne J Blaschke; Robert A Bonomo; Karen C Carroll; Mary Jane Ferraro; Lisa R Hirschhorn; W Patrick Joseph; Tobi Karchmer; Ann T MacIntyre; L Barth Reller; Audrey F Jackson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Impact of Species Diversity on the Design of RNA-Based Diagnostics for Antibiotic Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Crista B Wadsworth; Mohamad R A Sater; Roby P Bhattacharyya; Yonatan H Grad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Prevalence of mcr-1 in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae recovered from bloodstream infections in China: a multicentre longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jingjing Quan; Xi Li; Yan Chen; Yan Jiang; Zhihui Zhou; Huichuan Zhang; Lu Sun; Zhi Ruan; Ye Feng; Murat Akova; Yunsong Yu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Sophie Baron; Linda Hadjadj; Jean-Marc Rolain; Abiola Olumuyiwa Olaitan
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance.

Authors:  Catharina C Boehme; Pamela Nabeta; Doris Hillemann; Mark P Nicol; Shubhada Shenai; Fiorella Krapp; Jenny Allen; Rasim Tahirli; Robert Blakemore; Roxana Rustomjee; Ana Milovic; Martin Jones; Sean M O'Brien; David H Persing; Sabine Ruesch-Gerdes; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Camilla Rodrigues; David Alland; Mark D Perkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  RNA markers for ultra-rapid molecular antimicrobial susceptibility testing in fluoroquinolone-treated Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Marjan M Hashemi; Nadya Andini; Michelle M Li; Shuzhen Kuang; Karen C Carroll; Tza-Huei Wang; Samuel Yang
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  A Rapid Molecular Test for Determining Yersinia pestis Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin by the Quantification of Differentially Expressed Marker Genes.

Authors:  Ida Steinberger-Levy; Ohad Shifman; Anat Zvi; Naomi Ariel; Adi Beth-Din; Ofir Israeli; David Gur; Moshe Aftalion; Sharon Maoz; Raphael Ber
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes.

Authors:  Ana Rita Rebelo; Valeria Bortolaia; Jette S Kjeldgaard; Susanne K Pedersen; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Inge M Hansen; Beatriz Guerra; Burkhard Malorny; Maria Borowiak; Jens Andre Hammerl; Antonio Battisti; Alessia Franco; Patricia Alba; Agnes Perrin-Guyomard; Sophie A Granier; Cristina De Frutos Escobar; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Laura Villa; Alessandra Carattoli; Rene S Hendriksen
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.