| Literature DB >> 35615560 |
Bo Gou1,2,3,4, Xiaojing Chu1,2,3, Yi Xiao1,2,3,4, Pinxuan Liu1,2,3,4, Hao Zhang1,2,3,4, Zeyu Gao1,2,3, Moshi Song1,2,3,4.
Abstract
The senescence of cardiovascular endothelial cells (ECs) is a major risk factor in the development of aging-related cardiovascular diseases. However, the molecular dynamics in cardiovascular EC aging are poorly understood. Here, we characterized the transcriptomic landscape of cardiovascular ECs during aging and observed that ribosome biogenesis, inflammation, apoptosis and angiogenesis-related genes and pathways changed with age. We also highlighted the importance of collagen genes in the crosstalk between ECs and other cell types in cardiovascular aging. Moreover, transcriptional regulatory network analysis revealed Jun as a candidate transcription factor involved in murine cardiovascular senescence and we validated the upregulation of Jun in aged cardiovascular ECs both in vitro and in vivo. Altogether, our study reveals the transcriptomic reprogramming in the aging murine cardiovascular ECs, which deepens the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cardiovascular aging and provides new insights into potential therapeutic targets against age-related cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Keywords: age-dependent genes; cardiovascular endothelial cells; scRNA-seq; senescence; transcriptomic reprogramming
Year: 2022 PMID: 35615560 PMCID: PMC9124831 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.900978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1scRNA-seq analysis of cardiovascular endothelial cells (ECs) during aging. (A) t-SNE plot showing nine cell types from heart and aorta. CM, cardiomyocyte; MC, mast cell; FB, fibroblast; ENC, endocardial cell; EC, endothelial cell; WBC, leukocyte; RBC, erythrocyte; SMC, smooth muscle cell; Neu, cardiac neuron. (B) Bar plot showing cell proportion of nine cell types from heart and aorta. (C) Violin plots showing expression of EC markers in the heart and aorta. (D) Violin plot showing the SASP gene set score is significantly increased with age in ECs. ns, not significant; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (E) t-SNE plot showing eight clusters of ECs from heart and aorta. (F) t-SNE plot showing ECs from heart and aorta across the lifespan. (G) Heatmap showing top 10 markers expressed in each cluster of ECs from the heart and aorta.
Figure 2Differential gene expression analysis of cardiovascular ECs across the lifespan. (A) Volcano plots showing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 18 and 3 m, 21 and 3 m, 24 and 3 m, 30 and 3 m (from left to right), respectively. X-axis indicates the Log2(fold change); Y-axis indicates the –Log10(adjusted p-values). Upregulated genes are colored in red and downregulated genes are colored in blue. (B) Venn diagrams showing the numbers of overlapped upregulated (left) and downregulated (right) DEGs between four comparisons, including 18 vs. 3 m (red), 21 vs. 3 m (blue), 24 vs. 3 m (green), 30 vs. 3 m (purple). (C) Dot plots showing representative GO terms enriched in DEGs based on functional enrichment analysis. –Log10(adjusted p-values) are indicated by colors, and gene counts of each GO term are indicated by the dot size.
Figure 3Age-related transcriptional dynamics in cardiovascular ECs. (A) Left: Heatmap showing expression signatures of age-dependent genes (ADGs) of ECs from heart and aorta with age; row-scaled Z scores are indicated by colors from blue (low) to red (high). Middle: Line plots showing average expression value of each cluster. Right: representative GO terms. (B) Violin plots showing the expression level of the overlapped genes between identified ADGs and genes acquired from GenAge database. (C) Dot plot showing the expression level of ADGs associated with cardiovascular diseases.
Figure 4Changes in ligand-receptor interactions between cardiovascular ECs and other cell types during aging. (A,B) Changes of selected ligand-receptor interactions between ECs and other cell types (A: ECs express the specific ligand. B: receptor) during aging. CM, cardiomyocyte; MC, mast cell; FB, fibroblast; ENC, endocardial cell; EC, endothelial cell; WBC, leukocyte; RBC, erythrocyte; SMC, smooth muscle cell; Neu, cardiac neuron. Dot size represents the p-value. The color key indicates the mean expression level of each interacting pair.
Figure 5Transcription regulatory network analysis uncovers Jun as a regulator of vascular aging. (A) Heatmap of transcription factor (TF) activities at six time points. (B) Gene network showing target genes of Jun. The dot size presents relative weight values in the regulatory network. (C) Lollipop chart showing enriched GO pathways of Jun target genes. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of Jun mRNA levels in young (3 m) vs. aged mouse (22 m) aorta. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) biological repeats. *p < 0.05 (Student's t-test). (E) SA-β-gal staining in HUVECs treated with vehicle (Ctrl) or Dox (doxorubicin). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 (Student's t-test). Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA levels of aging markers in HUVECs upon Dox treatment. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (Student's t-test). (G) qRT-PCR analysis of JUN mRNA levels in HUVECs upon Dox treatment. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). *p < 0.05 (Student's t-test).