| Literature DB >> 35615198 |
Abstract
In Japan, many incidents regarding manga-like virtual agents have happened recently, in which critics have indicated that virtual agents used in public spaces are too sexual. Prior study defined this perception as "moe-phobia." In many cases, critics have pointed to agents' clothes. However, after verifying actual moe-phobia incidents, I hypothesize that these incidents are associated with not only the agents' clothes but also the situations in which they are used. I conducted an experiment with three factors and two levels to verify this hypothesis. The independent values were the agents' clothes, usage scenario, and the gender of the participants. The dependent values were the agents' trustworthiness, familiarity, likability, sexuality, and suitability as perceived by humans. I conducted the experiment with female and male groups and conducted a three-way ANOVA for each dependent value for each group. As a result, I observed a different tendency regarding the impression of the agents between female and male groups; however, both groups had the same tendency regarding the perceived suitability. The female and male participants judged the agents' suitability from not only their clothes but also the scenario.Entities:
Keywords: gender bias; human-agent interaction; manga-like character; moe-phobia; virtual agent
Year: 2022 PMID: 35615198 PMCID: PMC9126182 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.752748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Left: Kizuna AI (https://kizunaai.com/). Right: Uzaki-chan's collaboration art with Japanese Red Cross for blood donation campaign. Adapted/Reproduced with permission from IVR, available at https://vkatsu.jp/.
Figure 2The agent I used in the experiment. The left agent is used for business suit conditions, and the right is for swimsuit conditions. Adapted/Reproduced with permission from IVR, available at https://vkatsu.jp/.
Speech text for two levels for context.
|
|
|---|
| Hello, everyone. I am working at a reception desk in this municipal office. |
| This municipal office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays. |
| You can get a resident's card at the reception on the first floor. |
| Also, you can get a consultation regarding payment of taxes and social services |
| on the second floor, |
| and you can submit for marriage registration and submit a change of |
| address notification on the third floor. |
| Also, you can consult with a child development expert every Wednesday. |
| Please feel free to ask me if there is anything that you don't understand. |
|
|
| Hello, everyone. I am working at a reception desk in this anime shop. |
| This shop is open from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. |
| It's a five-story building, and you can find and get many kinds of anime goods in |
| this shop. |
| Also, we often hold a book signing event in the event space on holidays. |
| Please feel free to ask me if there is anything that you don't understand. |
Levels of two factors for each condition.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 | business suit | municipal office |
| Condition 2 | business suit | anime shop |
| Condition 3 | swimwear | municipal office |
| Condition 4 | swimwear | anime shop |
Questions I used in the experiment.
|
|
| Q1: How much did you feel that this agent was trustworthy? |
|
|
| Q2: How much did you feel that this agent was familiar? |
|
|
| Q3: How much did you feel that this agent was likable? |
|
|
| Q4: How much did you feel that this agent was too sexual? |
|
|
| Q5: How much did you feel that this agent was suitable for this situation |
| (municipal office/anime shop)? |
Figure 3Graphs showing averages for each question observed in the experiment.
Results of three-way ANOVA for Q1 (trustworthiness).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ** |
|
| |
| Context | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.030 | 0.090 | ||
| Participants' gender | 1.21 | 0.27 | 0.058 | 0.199 | ||
| Appearance × context | 3.41 | 0.06 | 0.096 | 0.462 | ||
| Appearance × participants' gender | 2.99 | 0.08 | 0.090 | 0.415 | ||
| Context × participants' gender | 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.043 | 0.133 | ||
| Appearance × context × participants' gender | 2.71 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.386 |
** means p < 0.01 and bold indicates p < 0.01.
Results of three-way ANOVA, simple main effect test for appearance × context, and simple main effect test for appearance × context × participants' gender for Q2 (familiarity).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | 2.89 | 0.09 | 0.089 | 0.403 | |
| Context | 0.00 | 0.97 | 0.002 | 0.050 | |
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
|
|
| * |
|
| |
| Appearance × participants' gender | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.033 | 0.098 | |
| Context × participants' gender | 1.05 | 0.31 | 0.053 | 0.179 | |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
| Simple main effect test for appearance × context | |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance (context is anime shop) | 0.26 | 0.61 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit) | 3.02 | 0.08 | |||
| Context (appearance is swimsuit) | 2.83 | 0.09 | |||
| Simple main effect test for | |||||
| appearance × context × participants' gender | |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance × context | |||||
| (participants' gender is male) | 0.00 | 0.97 | |||
|
|
|
| * | ||
| Appearance × participants' gender | |||||
| (context is anime shop) | 1.70 | 0.19 | |||
| Context × participants' gender | |||||
| (appearance is business suit) | 1.05 | 0.31 | |||
|
|
|
| * |
* means p < 0.05 and ** means p < 0.01. Bold indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 4Graphs showing interaction observed in the experiment.
Simple main effect test for appearance × context × participants' gender for Q2 (familiarity).
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance (context is municipal office, participants' gender is male) | 0.26 | 0.61 | |||
| Appearance (context is anime shop, participants' gender is female) | 1.64 | 0.20 | |||
| Appearance (context is anime shop, participants' gender is male) | 0.31 | 0.57 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit, participants' gender is female) | 3.82 | 0.051 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit, participants' gender is male) | 0.26 | 0.62 | |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Context (appearance is swimsuit, participants' gender is male) | 0.32 | 0.57 | |||
| Participants' gender (appearance is business suit, context is municipal office) | 0.31 | 0.58 | |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
|
|
|
| * | ||
| Participants' gender (appearance is swimsuit, context is anime shop) | 0.03 | 0.86 |
* means p < 0.05 and ** means p < 0.01. Bold indicates p < 0.05.
Results of three-way ANOVA and simple main effect test for appearance × context × participants' gender for Q3 (likability).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | 1.50 | 0.22 | 0.064 | 0.235 | |
| Context | 1.56 | 0.21 | 0.065 | 0.242 | |
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
| Appearance × context | 2.88 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.401 | |
| Appearance × participants' gender | 3.66 | 0.06 | 0.100 | 0.488 | |
| Context × participants' gender | 1.55 | 0.21 | 0.065 | 0.241 | |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
| Simple main effect test for | |||||
| appearance × context × participants' gender | |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance × context | |||||
| (participants' gender is male) | 0.05 | 0.82 | |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance × participants' gender | |||||
| (context is anime shop) | 0.01 | 0.94 | |||
| Context × participants' gender | |||||
| (appearance is business suit) | 0.30 | 0.59 | |||
|
|
|
| * |
* means p < 0.05 and ** means p < 0.01. Bold indicates p < 0.05.
Simple main effect test for appearance × context × participants' gender for Q3 (likability).
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance (context is municipal office, participants' gender is male) | 0.08 | 0.78 | |||
| Appearance (context is anime shop, participants' gender is female) | 0.25 | 0.62 | |||
| Appearance (context is anime shop, participants' gender is male) | 0.04 | 0.85 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit, participants' gender is female) | 3.44 | 0.06 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit, participants' gender is male) | 3.44 | 0.06 | |||
| Context (appearance is swimsuit, participants' gender is female) | 1.18 | 0.28 | |||
| Context (appearance is swimsuit, participants' gender is male) | 1.97 | 0.16 | |||
| Participants' gender (appearance is business suit, context is municipal office) | 0.25 | 0.62 | |||
| Participants' gender (appearance is swimsuit, context is municipal office) | 1.60 | 0.21 | |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Participants' gender (appearance is swimsuit, context is anime shop) | 1.36 | 0.24 |
** means p < 0.01 and bold indicates p < 0.01.
Results of three-way ANOVA simple main effect test for appearance × participants' gender for Q4 (sexuality).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
| Participants' gender | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.029 | 0.087 | |
| Appearance × context | 1.92 | 0.17 | 0.072 | 0.287 | |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
| Context × participants' gender | 1.03 | 0.31 | 0.053 | 0.176 | |
| Appearance × context × participants' gender | 0.10 | 0.75 | 0.017 | 0.062 | |
| Simple main effect test | |||||
| for appearance × participants' gender | |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
|
|
|
| * | ||
| Participants' gender (appearance is swimsuit) | 1.78 | 0.18 |
* means p < 0.05 and ** means p < 0.01. Bold indicates p < 0.05.
Results of three-way ANOVA simple main effect test for appearance × context for Q5 (suitability).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
|
|
|
| ** |
|
|
|
|
|
| * |
|
|
|
|
| * |
|
| |
| Appearance × participants' gender | 2.96 | 0.09 | 0.090 | 0.411 | |
| Context × participants' gender | 0.050 | 0.82 | 0.012 | 0.056 | |
| Appearance × context × participants' gender | 0.19 | 0.66 | 0.023 | 0.073 | |
| Simple main effect test | |||||
| for appearance × context | |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ** | ||
| Appearance (context is anime shop) | 2.47 | 0.12 | |||
| Context (appearance is business suit) | 0.09 | 0.77 | |||
|
|
|
| ** |
* means p < 0.05 and ** means p < 0.01. Bold indicates p < 0.05.
Correlation coefficients between the age of participants and each of their answers.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Condition 1 | ||
| Q1 | 0.173 | |
| Q2 | 0.223 | |
| Q3 | 0.070 | |
| Q4 | –0.060 | |
| Q5 | 0.162 | |
| Condition 2 | ||
| Q1 | 0.132 | |
| Q2 | 0.241 | |
| Q3 | 0.182 | |
| Q4 | 0.235 | |
| Q5 | 0.182 | |
| Condition 3 | ||
| Q1 | 0.131 | |
| Q2 | 0.168 | |
| Q3 | 0.154 | |
| Q4 | –0.121 | |
| Q5 | 0.208 | |
| Condition 4 | ||
| Q1 | 0.157 | |
| Q2 | 0.128 | |
| Q3 | 0.164 | |
| Q4 | –0.108 | |
| Q5 | 0.190 | |