| Literature DB >> 35614886 |
Shahriar Dashti1, Mousa-Al-Reza Hadjzadeh2,3, Ahmad Ghorbani4, Masoud Mohebbi5, Zahra Gholamnezhad3,6.
Abstract
Objective: The present randomized clinical trial assessed the antihyperglycemic and hypolipidemic effects of hydro-ethanolic extract of Ribes khorassanicum. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Co-supplementation; Diabetes mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Hyperlipidemia; Ribes khorassanicum
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614886 PMCID: PMC9090322 DOI: 10.22038/AJP.2021.51446.2676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1The consort flow diagram of the study
Baseline characteristics of the study participants
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 47.1±8.21 | 49.07±7.12 | 0.25 |
|
| N (%) | N (%) | |
|
| 21 (52.5) | 25 (62.5) | 0.49* |
|
| 19 (47.5) | 15 (37.5) | |
|
| 29.77±4.7 | 29.08.8±3.58 | 0.47 |
|
| N (%) | N (%) | 0.87 * |
|
| 3 (7.5) | 3 (7.5) | |
|
| 23 (57.5) | 26 (65) | |
|
| 14 (35) | 11 (27.5) | |
|
| N (%) | N (%) | 0.57* |
|
| 3 (7.5) | 4 (10) | |
|
| 22 (55) | 26 (65) | |
|
| 10 (25) | 8 (20) | |
|
| 5 (12.5) | 2 (5) | |
|
| N (%) | N (%) | 0.83* |
|
| 16(40) | 19 (47.5) | |
|
| 24 (60) | 21 (52.5) | |
|
| 5.25±3.61 | 6.7±4.9 | 0.14 |
|
| 130±12.9 | 129.75±10.12 | 0.92 |
|
| 72.9±6.97 | 71.5±5.45 | 0.33 |
|
| 91.9±8.3 | 90.91±6.36 | 0.55 |
Data are presented as percentage and Mean±SD (standard deviation). BMI=body mass index; SBP=systolic blood pressure; DBP=diastolic blood pressure. *chi-squared test and **independent t-test were used to compare the two groups at baseline.
Figure 2Mean changes (%) of FBS (Fasting blood glucose), 2hPPG (2 hours postprandial), TG (Triglyceride), TC (total cholesterol), LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) of placebo (medium filled bars) and Ribes khorasanicum group (fine filled bars). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01, compared to placebo group
Clinical parameters at baseline and after 90-day intervention
| 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.0079 | 87.04±11.5 | 91.9±8.3 | 0.0008 | 86.16±5.77 | 90.91±6.36 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| 0.003 | 0.67 | 0.004 | 159.1 | 173.77±41.7 | <0.0001 | 140.77 | 177.63±39.79 |
| ||||
| 0.281 | 0.822 | 0.0007 | 233.72 | 262.12±71.38 | <0.0001 | 219.62 | 258.58±69.07 |
| ||||
| 0.42 | 0.88 | 0.1072 | 8 ±1.06 | 8.24±1.14 | 0.0014 | 7.81 ±1.08 | 8.20±1.31 |
| ||||
| 0.046 | 0.98 | 0.6446 | 161.65±57.92 | 165.57±64.18 | 0.0011 | 137.9±46.15 | 160.75±70.01 |
| ||||
| 0.036 | 0.357 | 0.0006 | 167.1±32.32 | 178.12±33.07 | <0.0001 | 153.65±23.42 | 185.62±39.10 |
| ||||
| 0.003 | 0.84 | 0.622 | 108.82±32.13 | 110.62±33.98 | 0.0002 | 89.24±25.38 | 114.62±35.41 |
| ||||
| 0.528 | 0.445 | 0.3442 | 37.62±5.85 | 38.85±5.65 | 0.4708 | 36.82±5.43 | 37.8±6.54 |
| ||||
| 0.119 | 0.348 | 0.6859 | 25.07±12.31 | 22.80±6.38 | 0.5681 | 21.55±7.01 | 22.47±7.40 |
| ||||
| 0.899 | 0.679 | 0.8971 | 25.55±10.23 | 25.85±10.44 | 0.6846 | 25.85±10.85 | 26.87±11.61 |
| ||||
| 0.658 | 0.377 | 0.3329 | 17.12±3.61 | 18.07±4.99 | 0.6580 | 17.75±8.15 | 17.07±5.08 |
| ||||
| 0.312 | 0.06 | 0.8176 | 0.94±0.11 | 0.95±0.17 | 0.156 | 0.97±0.14 | 1.02±0.19 |
| ||||
| 0.838 | 0.94 | 0.6902 | 23.17±14.46 | 21.83±15.52 | 0.9383 | 22.4±19.12 | 22.09±15.85 |
| ||||
| 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.0648 | 124.87±11.5 | 130±12.9 | 0.0481 | 125.5±8.75 | 129.75±10.12 |
| ||||
| 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.0027 | 68.12±6.76 | 72.9±6.97 | <0.0001 | 66.5±5.33 | 71.5±5.45 |
| ||||
Data are presented as percentage and Mean±SD (standard deviation). Independent samples t-test was used for statistical analysis between groups and dependent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis within groups. Int=intervention; FBS=Fasting blood glucose; 2hPPG=2 hours postprandial; TG=Triglyceride; TC=Total cholesterol; MAU=Urine Microalbumin; SBP=Systolic blood pressure; DBP=Diastolic blood pressure.