| Literature DB >> 35614883 |
Rana Keyhanmanesh1,2,3, Gholamreza Hamidian4, Hajie Lotfi3, Zohre Zavari5, Monireh Seyfollahzadeh5, Afsane Ghadiri5, Mehdi Ahmadi5, Farzad Bahari3, Fariba Mirzaei Bavil5,3.
Abstract
Objective: Nephropathy is known to be the leading cause of kidney failure in diabetic patients. Troxerutin, as a flavonoid component, could provide a novel protective strategy in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy. A large number of reports on the salutary effects of troxerutin inspired us to investigate its effect on the nephropathy signaling events (i.e., expression of TGF-β, miRNA192, and SIP1) in type-1 induced diabetic rats. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Nephropathy; SIP1; TGF-β; Troxerutin; miRNA192
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614883 PMCID: PMC9090315 DOI: 10.22038/AJP.2021.18875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
The rats in each group of the study and related interventions
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Control | Nothing | - |
| Sham (T) | Received troxerutin (150 mg per kg), once daily, for 4 weeks by oral gavage | - |
| Diabetic (D) | Induction of diabetes by intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ) | |
| Diabetic with insulin (DI) | Received NPH insulin (4-6 units), once daily, for 4 weeks | |
| Diabetic with troxerutin (DT) | Received troxerutin (150 mg/ kg), once daily, by oral gavage for 4 weeks |
miRNA primers sets were used in the qPCR
| Target Sequence |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CTGACCTATGAATTGACAGCC | MIMAT0000449٭ |
|
| CAACGGAAUCCCAAAAGCAGCUG | MIMAT0000440٭ |
|
| ٭ | ||
Figure 1The effects of troxerutin on expression level of miR-192 in the kidneys of type 1 diabetic rats. Each bar represents the mean±SEM (n=10), ⁎p<0.001 in comparison with the control group; #p<0.0001 in comparison with the diabetic group. (D: diabetic, T: Received troxerutin, DT: Diabetic treated with troxerutin, and DI: diabetics that received insulin).
Figure 2The effects of troxerutin on TGF-β level in the kidneys of type 1 diabetic rats. Each bar represents the mean±SEM (n=10), ⁎p<0.0001 in comparison with the control group; # in comparison with the diabetic group (D vs I: p<0.0001, D vs DI: p=0.0002, and D vs DT: p<0.0001) (D: diabetic, T: received troxerutin, DT: Diabetic treated with troxerutin, and DI: diabetics that received insulin).
Figure 3The effects of troxerutin on SIP1 level in the kidneys of type 1 diabetic rats. Each bar represents the mean±SEM (n=10), ⁎p<0.05 in comparison with the control group; # in comparison with the troxerutin group (D vs T: p<0.0001, T vs DT: p=0.0028). (D: diabetic, T: Received troxerutin, DT: Diabetic treated with troxerutin, and DI: diabetics that received insulin)