| Literature DB >> 35614121 |
Michael Olbrich1,2, Anna Lara Ernst1, Hauke Busch3,4, Axel Künstner1,2, Ralf J Ludwig5,6, Foteini Beltsiou1, Katja Bieber1, Sascha Ständer7, Melanie Harder8, Waltraud Anemüller7, Birgit Köhler7, Detlef Zillikens7.
Abstract
Onychomycosis (OM) is a common fungal nail infection. Based on the rich mycobial diversity in healthy toenails, we speculated that this is lost in OM due to the predominance of a single pathogen. We used next generation sequencing to obtain insights into the biodiversity of fungal communities in both healthy individuals and OM patients. By sequencing, a total of 338 operational-taxonomic units were found in OM patients and healthy controls. Interestingly, a classifier distinguished three distinct subsets: healthy controls and two groups within OM patients with either a low or high abundance of Trichophyton. Diversity per sample was decreased in controls compared to cases with low Trichophyton abundance (LTA), while cases with a high Trichophyton abundance (HTA) showed a lower diversity. Variation of mycobial communities between the samples showed shifts in the community structure between cases and controls-mainly driven by HTA cases. Indeed, LTA cases had a fungal β-diversity undistinguishable from that of healthy controls. Collectively, our data provides an in-depth characterization of fungal diversity in health and OM. Our findings also suggest that onychomycosis develops either through pathogen-driven mechanisms, i.e., in HTA cases, or through host and/or environmental factors, i.e., in cases with a low Trichophyton abundance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614121 PMCID: PMC9133011 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13074-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flowchart of cohort collocation.
Covariate data.
| Group | Sex (f|m) | Age (mean|sd) | Pets1 (no|yes) | Therapy2 (no|yes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 13|6 | 42.74|16.26 | 15|4 | 19|0 |
| 15|25 | 61.33|12.47 | 29|11 | 33|7 | |
| Case LTA | 12|12 | 60.17|12.71 | 18|6 | 21|3 |
| Case HTA | 3|13 | 63.06|12.29 | 11|5 | 12|4 |
List of covariates grouped by case and control samples as well as the identified classification into low Trichophyton abundance (LTA) and high Trichophyton abundance (HTA) subgroups 1indicates if pets are in the household and/or the individual has contact to animals on a regular basis 2indicates if the person had applied any treatment (topically and/or systemically) to the suspected onychomycosis.
Figure 2Composition of toenail fungal communities. (A) The 20 most abundant fungal genera (average across samples) were selected for visualization The category others comprises all remaining genera Samples are depicted in cohort grouping of confirmed case- and healthy control samples Within those groups the samples were arranged based on the abundance of genus Trichophyton in order to visualize the found subdivision in the case group. (B) Alpha diversity in sample-wise estimates showed no difference between controls and LTA group Compared to the control group a significant decrease in Shannon diversity was observed (p < 0.001, decrease 0.8934, s.e. 0.1886) in HTA samples. (C) Estimated alpha diversity in community-wise comparison using Shannon The low Trichophyton abundance (LTA) group showed a significant increase in diversity compared to the healthy controls (p = 0.001, increase 0.1719, s.e. 0.0511) The high Trichophyton abundance (HTA) group had a significantly lower diversity compare to the control group (p < 0.001, increase 2.9728, s.e. 0.0652). (D) Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) of case/control samples based on the Euclidian distance on PhILR transformed counts with blue triangles referring to controls, orange circles to LTA cases and violet circles to HTA cases Axis 1 capture 26.1% of the variation and separates the cases into two distinct groups.