Adrienne Tin1,2, Jan Bressler3, Jeannette Simino4, Kevin J Sullivan5, Hao Mei4, B Gwen Windham5, Michael Griswold5, Rebecca F Gottesman6, Eric Boerwinkle3, Myriam Fornage3,7, Tom H Mosley5. 1. Memory Impairment and Neurodegenerative Dementia (MIND) Center and Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS atin@umc.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. Human Genetics Center, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS. 5. Memory Impairment and Neurodegenerative Dementia (MIND) Center and Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS. 6. Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 7. Institute of Molecular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: and ObjectivesHigher scores in Life's Simple 7 (LS7), a metric for cardiovascular and brain health, have been associated with lower risk of dementia. It is uncertain whether this association holds among those with high genetic risk of dementia. Our objective is to evaluate the extent that LS7 may offset dementia risk across the range of genetic risk.Methods PARTICIPANTS: in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study were followed from 1987-89 to 2019. We derived midlife LS7 scores and generated genetic risk scores (GRS) using genome-wide summary statistics of Alzheimer's Disease, which have been used to study the genetic risk for dementia. Incident dementia was ascertained based on the criteria of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The associations of the GRS and LS7 with incident dementia were evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS: This study included 8,823 European Americans (EA) and 2,738 African Americans (AA) (mean age at baseline: 54). We observed 1,603 cases of dementia among EA and 631 among AA (median follow-up: 26.2 years). Higher GRS were associated with higher risk of dementia (EA, hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37, 1.51; AA, HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.36). Among EA, higher LS7 scores were consistently associated with lower risk of dementia across quintiles of GRS, including the highest quintile (HR per point 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.96). Among AA, the associations between LS7 and incident dementia within stratum of GRS had the same direction as among EA, though wide confidence intervals and smaller sample sizes limited reliable inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Across strata of GRS, higher midlife LS7 scores were associated with lower risk of dementia. Larger sample sizes from diverse populations are needed to obtain more reliable estimates of the effects of modifiable health factors on dementia risk within genetic risk stratum in each ancestry group. Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a "work of the United States Government" for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
BACKGROUND: and ObjectivesHigher scores in Life's Simple 7 (LS7), a metric for cardiovascular and brain health, have been associated with lower risk of dementia. It is uncertain whether this association holds among those with high genetic risk of dementia. Our objective is to evaluate the extent that LS7 may offset dementia risk across the range of genetic risk.Methods PARTICIPANTS: in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study were followed from 1987-89 to 2019. We derived midlife LS7 scores and generated genetic risk scores (GRS) using genome-wide summary statistics of Alzheimer's Disease, which have been used to study the genetic risk for dementia. Incident dementia was ascertained based on the criteria of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The associations of the GRS and LS7 with incident dementia were evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS: This study included 8,823 European Americans (EA) and 2,738 African Americans (AA) (mean age at baseline: 54). We observed 1,603 cases of dementia among EA and 631 among AA (median follow-up: 26.2 years). Higher GRS were associated with higher risk of dementia (EA, hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37, 1.51; AA, HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.36). Among EA, higher LS7 scores were consistently associated with lower risk of dementia across quintiles of GRS, including the highest quintile (HR per point 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.96). Among AA, the associations between LS7 and incident dementia within stratum of GRS had the same direction as among EA, though wide confidence intervals and smaller sample sizes limited reliable inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Across strata of GRS, higher midlife LS7 scores were associated with lower risk of dementia. Larger sample sizes from diverse populations are needed to obtain more reliable estimates of the effects of modifiable health factors on dementia risk within genetic risk stratum in each ancestry group. Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a "work of the United States Government" for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
Authors: Wayne D Rosamond; Patricia P Chang; Chris Baggett; Anna Johnson; Alain G Bertoni; Eyal Shahar; Anita Deswal; Gerardo Heiss; Lloyd E Chambless Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Alina Solomon; Heidi Turunen; Tiia Ngandu; Markku Peltonen; Esko Levälahti; Seppo Helisalmi; Riitta Antikainen; Lars Bäckman; Tuomo Hänninen; Antti Jula; Tiina Laatikainen; Jenni Lehtisalo; Jaana Lindström; Teemu Paajanen; Satu Pajala; Anna Stigsdotter-Neely; Timo Strandberg; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Hilkka Soininen; Miia Kivipelto Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jessica R Marden; Stefan Walter; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Ichiro Kawachi; M Maria Glymour Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Joannella Morales; Danielle Welter; Emily H Bowler; Maria Cerezo; Laura W Harris; Aoife C McMahon; Peggy Hall; Heather A Junkins; Annalisa Milano; Emma Hastings; Cinzia Malangone; Annalisa Buniello; Tony Burdett; Paul Flicek; Helen Parkinson; Fiona Cunningham; Lucia A Hindorff; Jacqueline A L MacArthur Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: J C Lambert; C A Ibrahim-Verbaas; D Harold; A C Naj; R Sims; C Bellenguez; A L DeStafano; J C Bis; G W Beecham; B Grenier-Boley; G Russo; T A Thorton-Wells; N Jones; A V Smith; V Chouraki; C Thomas; M A Ikram; D Zelenika; B N Vardarajan; Y Kamatani; C F Lin; A Gerrish; H Schmidt; B Kunkle; M L Dunstan; A Ruiz; M T Bihoreau; S H Choi; C Reitz; F Pasquier; C Cruchaga; D Craig; N Amin; C Berr; O L Lopez; P L De Jager; V Deramecourt; J A Johnston; D Evans; S Lovestone; L Letenneur; F J Morón; D C Rubinsztein; G Eiriksdottir; K Sleegers; A M Goate; N Fiévet; M W Huentelman; M Gill; K Brown; M I Kamboh; L Keller; P Barberger-Gateau; B McGuiness; E B Larson; R Green; A J Myers; C Dufouil; S Todd; D Wallon; S Love; E Rogaeva; J Gallacher; P St George-Hyslop; J Clarimon; A Lleo; A Bayer; D W Tsuang; L Yu; M Tsolaki; P Bossù; G Spalletta; P Proitsi; J Collinge; S Sorbi; F Sanchez-Garcia; N C Fox; J Hardy; M C Deniz Naranjo; P Bosco; R Clarke; C Brayne; D Galimberti; M Mancuso; F Matthews; S Moebus; P Mecocci; M Del Zompo; W Maier; H Hampel; A Pilotto; M Bullido; F Panza; P Caffarra; B Nacmias; J R Gilbert; M Mayhaus; L Lannefelt; H Hakonarson; S Pichler; M M Carrasquillo; M Ingelsson; D Beekly; V Alvarez; F Zou; O Valladares; S G Younkin; E Coto; K L Hamilton-Nelson; W Gu; C Razquin; P Pastor; I Mateo; M J Owen; K M Faber; P V Jonsson; O Combarros; M C O'Donovan; L B Cantwell; H Soininen; D Blacker; S Mead; T H Mosley; D A Bennett; T B Harris; L Fratiglioni; C Holmes; R F de Bruijn; P Passmore; T J Montine; K Bettens; J I Rotter; A Brice; K Morgan; T M Foroud; W A Kukull; D Hannequin; J F Powell; M A Nalls; K Ritchie; K L Lunetta; J S Kauwe; E Boerwinkle; M Riemenschneider; M Boada; M Hiltuenen; E R Martin; R Schmidt; D Rujescu; L S Wang; J F Dartigues; R Mayeux; C Tzourio; A Hofman; M M Nöthen; C Graff; B M Psaty; L Jones; J L Haines; P A Holmans; M Lathrop; M A Pericak-Vance; L J Launer; L A Farrer; C M van Duijn; C Van Broeckhoven; V Moskvina; S Seshadri; J Williams; G D Schellenberg; P Amouyel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Klodian Dhana; Lisa L Barnes; Xiaoran Liu; Puja Agarwal; Pankaja Desai; Kristin R Krueger; Thomas M Holland; Shannon Halloway; Neelum T Aggarwal; Denis A Evans; Kumar B Rajan Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 16.655