| Literature DB >> 35613136 |
Abstract
Ethnoveterinary study was conducted from March 2020 to December 2020 in Mojana Wodera district, centeral Ethiopia. The study was aimed to identify and document ethnoveterinary medicinal plant species and traditional medicinal knowledge of the traditional health practitioners. A total of 105 informants were selected purposely and volunteer sampling approaches, and from these total informants, 15 key informants were identified based on their knowledge difference. Semi-structured interviews, field observation, and discussion were employed to collect information. Descriptive statistical method was employed to analyze the collected data. Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) values were calculated to determine the most common livestock ailment categories that occurred and identify potentially effective medicinal plant species in respective disease categories. T-test was applied to compare knowledge difference. The result showed that a higher average (p< 0.05) was recorded for key informants, illiterate and elder group; however, there is no significance difference (p = 0.53) between gender. A total of 33 ethnoveterinary medicinal plant species, which belong to 23 families and 31 genera were identified. Family Asteraceae and family Solanaceae were the dominant. From this total number of plant species (12.12%) were endemic for Ethiopia. The finding showed that shrubs accounted for 39.39% followed by herbs (36.36%) and trees (15.15%). The medicinal plant parts that were most commonly utilized were leaf (55.36%) followed by root (23.21%) and seed (8.93%) respectively. Higher ICF was recorded for Blackleg (0.82) followed by general illness (0.8) and pasturalosis. In this study, Vernonia amygdalina was the most effective medicinal plants to treat blackleg.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35613136 PMCID: PMC9132277 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Statistical test of knowledge among different groups of informants on average number of medicinal plants reported.
| Parameters used | Groups of informants | N | Average ± SD | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 83 | 2.53 ± 1.426 | 0.53 |
| Female | 22 | 2.00 ± 1.234 | ||
| Age | Youngest group (20–39 yrs old) | 37 | 1.54 ± 0.767 | 0.000 |
| Senior group (40–85 yrs old) | 68 | 2.90 ± 1.437 | ||
| Educational level | Illiterate | 41 | 2.85 ± 1.131 | 0.01 |
| Educated | 64 | 2.14 ± 1.489 | ||
| Informant category | Key informants | 15 | 3.40 ± 1.502 | 0.003 |
| General informants | 90 | 2.26 ± 1.320 |
N = Number of respondents; significance difference (p <0.05).
The reference used in this table was the same as Table 2 of doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-21.
Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) of different ailments.
| Types of ailments | No plants used | % of the species | number of use citation | % of citation | ICF value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye defect | 2 | 6.06 | 4 | 2.53 | 0.67 |
| Diarrhea | 3 | 9.09 | 8 | 5.06 | 0.71 |
| New castle | 2 | 6.06 | 5 | 3.16 | 0.75 |
| Blackleg | 10 | 30.3 | 51 | 32.28 | 0.82 |
| Colic | 2 | 6.06 | 4 | 2.53 | 0.67 |
| Tania | 4 | 12.12 | 12 | 7.59 | 0.73 |
| Listeriosis | 2 | 6.06 | 5 | 3.16 | 0.75 |
| Leech | 2 | 6.06 | 3 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| Pasturalosis | 4 | 12.12 | 15 | 9.49 | 0.79 |
| Mite infestation | 4 | 12.12 | 9 | 5.7 | 0.63 |
| Myiasis | 2 | 6.06 | 4 | 2.53 | 0.67 |
| General illness | 7 | 21.21 | 31 | 19.62 | 0.8 |
| Adnominal pain | 2 | 6.06 | 3 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| Footrot | 2 | 6.06 | 4 | 2.53 | 0.67 |
ICF value of this table the same as ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (Online).
Fig 1Plant endemism in the district.
Fig 2Growth forms of the plant.
Fig 3Mode of application of medicinal plants.
Preference ranking medicinal plants to treat blackleg.
| Plant species | Respondents | Total | Rank | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | |||
|
| 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 55 | 8th |
|
| 8 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 108 | 3rd |
|
| 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 45 | 9th |
|
| 6 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 98 | 5th |
|
| 7 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 4th |
|
| 10 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 2nd |
|
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 63 | 7th |
|
| 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 9th |
|
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 65 | 6th |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 1st |
The reference this table the same as doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-21.
Major threats for medicinal plants for study district.
| Factors | Respondents | Total | Rank | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | R10 | R11 | R12 | R13 | R14 | R15 | |||
| Drought | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 79 | 2nd |
| Landslide | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 48 | 6th |
| Firewood | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 58 | 4th |
| Overgrazing | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 49 | 5th |
| Agriculture | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 98 | 1st |
| Construction | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 65 | 3rd |
| Medicinal value | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 7th |
The table of this reference of this table is the same as DOI 10.1186/s13002-018-0212-0.