Literature DB >> 35612797

Recent Updates on Microbial Biofilms in Periodontitis: An Analysis of In Vitro Biofilm Models.

Maick Meneguzzo Prado1, Nathalia Figueiredo2, Andréa de Lima Pimenta3,4, Tamires Szeremeske Miranda2, Magda Feres2, Luciene Cristina Figueiredo2, Josiane de Almeida5, Bruno Bueno-Silva4.   

Abstract

The development of oral biofilm models has been extremely important to study the specific role of most microbial species at the early stages of periodontitis. The current knowledge on monospecies or multispecies biofilms originates mainly from the observation of in vitro dynamic or static biofilm model systems, which were engineered to mimic clinical oral conditions. In the last few decades, mounting evidence has confirmed that biofilms are the major form of bacterial lifestyle, and more importantly, that microorganisms dwelling in sessile mixed-species aggregates display completely different phenotypes and physiological characteristics than when living in planktonic pure cultures. Interspecies interactions within these communities, mediated by chemical communication systems, have been shown to affect biofilm physiology and increase antimicrobial resistance by up to 1000 fold. These aspects reinforce the importance of developing multispecies biofilm models to better understand and control biofilms. Literature reports demonstrate that while monospecies models are still most commonly used in caries research, authors have used different multispecies models to study periodontal diseases. Periodontitis is a polymicrobial biofilm-dependent disease mainly associated with Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola. Interestingly, these species hardly adhere to substrates commonly used for biofilm formation, which makes multispecies models essential for an accurate analysis of periodontitis-related biofilms. The multispecies models currently available are generally composed of 6-10 species, but a more recent 34-species model was developed to better examine the dynamics within oral biofilms. The complexity of such polymicrobial biofilm models mimics more consistently the oral microbiome and different aspects of the oral environment. Collectively, the evidence on multispecies biofilm models described herein may support future studies on the use of antimicrobials for biofilm control as well as provide research opportunities to expand the current knowledge on interspecies interactions. The present manuscript reviews the most recent updates on in vitro biofilm model systems for periodontitis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro model; Multispecies biofilm; Periodontitis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35612797     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96881-6_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  58 in total

Review 1.  Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.

Authors:  M E Davey; G A O'toole
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  New device for high-throughput viability screening of flow biofilms.

Authors:  Michael R Benoit; Carolyn G Conant; Cristian Ionescu-Zanetti; Michael Schwartz; A Matin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Cetylpyridinium Chloride on Complex Multispecies Subgingival Biofilm.

Authors:  Stela Lima Farias de Miranda; Jennifer Toledo Damaceno; Marcelo Faveri; Luciene Cristina Figueiredo; Geisla Mary Silva Soares; Magda Feres; Bruno Bueno-Silva
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Microbial adhesion in flow displacement systems.

Authors:  Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  The periodontal war: microbes and immunity.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ebersole; Dolph Dawson; Pinar Emecen-Huja; Radhakrishnan Nagarajan; Katherine Howard; Martha E Grady; Katherine Thompson; Rebecca Peyyala; Ahmad Al-Attar; Kathryn Lethbridge; Sreenatha Kirakodu; Octavio A Gonzalez
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.589

6.  The effect of seasons on Brazilian red propolis and its botanical source: chemical composition and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Bruno Bueno-Silva; Alexandre Marsola; Masaharu Ikegaki; Severino M Alencar; Pedro L Rosalen
Journal:  Nat Prod Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.861

7.  Effect of oxygen, inoculum composition and flow rate on development of mixed-culture oral biofilms.

Authors:  David J Bradshaw; Philip D Marsh; Clive Allison; Kurt M Schilling
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Effect of neovestitol-vestitol containing Brazilian red propolis on accumulation of biofilm in vitro and development of dental caries in vivo.

Authors:  B Bueno-Silva; H Koo; M L Falsetta; S M Alencar; M Ikegaki; P L Rosalen
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  A modified chemostat system to study the ecology of oral biofilms.

Authors:  D J Bradshaw; P D Marsh; K M Schilling; D Cummins
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1996-02

10.  Apolar Bioactive Fraction of Melipona scutellaris Geopropolis on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm.

Authors:  Marcos Guilherme da Cunha; Marcelo Franchin; Lívia Câmara de Carvalho Galvão; Bruno Bueno-Silva; Masaharu Ikegaki; Severino Matias de Alencar; Pedro Luiz Rosalen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.