| Literature DB >> 35612772 |
Alessandra Prioreschi1, Ken K Ong2,3, Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe3, Kate Westgate3, Lisa K Micklesfield2, Soren Brage3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Considering the importance of the early life period, in conjunction with the increasing prevalence of adiposity and insufficient physical activity already evident in early childhood, this study aimed to determine associations between abdominal adiposity, body size, and objectively measured physical activity in infancy.Entities:
Keywords: Accelerometry; Body composition; Movement; Toddler
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35612772 PMCID: PMC9329383 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03406-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Health J ISSN: 1092-7875
Participant characteristics
| All | Boys | Girls | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 11.76 (7.59) | 11.68 (7.59) | 11.86 (7.80) | 0.49 |
| Length-for-age z-score | -0.92 (1.68) | -0.96 (1.46) | -0.88 (1.90) | 0.16 |
| Normal length (n(%)) | 106 (77) | 58 (78) | 48 (75) | 0.02 |
| Stunted (n(%)) | 32 (23) | 16 (22) | 16 (25) | |
| BMI z-score | 0.25 (1.68) | 0.23 (1.38) | 0.28 (1.97) | 0.41 |
| Underweight (n(%)) | 10 (7) | 4 (5) | 6 (9) | 0.81 |
| Normal weight (n(%)) | 124 (86) | 69 (88) | 55 (83) | |
| Overweight (n(%)) | 10 (7) | 5 (7) | 5 (8) | |
| SAT (cm) | 0.48 (0.08) | 0.48 (0.08) | 0.49 (0.09) | 0.55 |
| VAT (cm) | 2.66 (0.66) | 2.68 (0.52) | 2.64 (0.83) | 0.78 |
| Average hourly movement (mg) | 35.3 (0.5) | 38.6 (0.8) | 32.7 (0.7) | < 0.01 |
All values are mean(SD) except for the BMI categories which are n(%), and the hourly movement variable which is median(SEM)
Associations between body composition variables and physical activity during the whole day and restricted to daytime hours
| Physical activity (mg) over 24 h | Physical activity (mg) in daytime hours | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome variables | β coefficient | P value | 95% CI | β coefficient | P value | 95% CI | ||
| Length (cm) | 0.08 | 0.60 | -0.23 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.91 | -0.49 | 0.54 |
| BMI z-score | -0.26 | 0.64 | -1.38 | 0.85 | -0.38 | 0.69 | -2.28 | 1.51 |
| TAT (cm) | -0.31 | 0.84 | -3.21 | 2.59 | -2.22 | 0.35 | -6.84 | 2.40 |
| SAT (cm) | 6.80 | 0.41 | -9.53 | 23.14 | 12.15 | 0.47 | -20.56 | 44.86 |
| VAT (cm) | -1.20 | 0.35 | -3.72 | 1.32 | -3.27 | 0.11 | -7.27 | 0.73 |
| SAT to VAT (cm)* | -5.08 | 0.63 | -25.63 | 15.48 | -12.15 | 0.47 | -44.86 | 20.56 |
Results were derived from five separate multilevel regression models (for BMI z-score, length, total abdominal thickness, SAT, and VAT; and then for VAT vs. SAT substitution adjusted for total abdominal thickness)
Length models were controlled for age and sex
All VAT and SAT models were adjusted for age, sex, and length
* This model was further adjusted for TAT; i.e. representing effect of SAT to VAT substitution
Fig. 1Mean infant physical activity (adjusted for infant age and sex) plotted by hour of the day, stratified by infant length tertiles
Fig. 2Mean infant physical activity (adjusted for infant age and sex) plotted by hour of the day, stratified by infant BMI categories
Fig. 3Mean infant physical activity (adjusted for infant age, sex, and length) plotted by hour of the day, stratified by infant SAT tertiles
Fig. 4Mean infant physical activity (adjusted for infant age, sex, and length) plotted by hour of the day, stratified by VAT tertiles