Literature DB >> 35612759

Conceptual metaphors influence memory automatically: Evidence from a divided attention false memory task.

J Nick Reid1, Albert Katz2.   

Abstract

Previous research has found that reading a list of ostensibly unrelated expressions based on the same underlying conceptual metaphor can evoke false recognition on a memory task for new expressions that use the same metaphor, the so-called conceptual metaphor false memory effect. We examined the automaticity of this effect by dividing participants' attention with a concurrent task. In Study 1, attention was manipulated while participants read the lists of expressions, whereas in Study 2, attention was manipulated both when they read the lists and when they were engaged in the later recognition memory test. Across both studies, the conceptual metaphor false memory effect was observed when conscious processing was limited by dividing attention. These data support the argument that conceptual metaphors are automatically activated when metaphorical expressions are read.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conceptual metaphor theory; DRM; Divided attention; Episodic memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35612759     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01322-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Recollection rejection: false-memory editing in children and adults.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; Ron Wright; A H Mojardin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The career of metaphor.

Authors:  Brian F Bowdle; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Yayoi Kawasaki; Hiroshi Yama
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-01

4.  Development of the false-memory illusion.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; T J Forrest; D Karibian; V F Reyna
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2006-09

5.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

6.  Both associative activation and thematic extraction count, but thematic false memories are more easily rejected.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Angel Fernandez; Pedro Albuquerque
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2013-12-04

7.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

Authors:  N D Anderson; F I Craik; M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

8.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

9.  Two mechanisms of constructive recollection: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency.

Authors:  Manoj K Doss; Maximilian R Bluestone; David A Gallo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: making connections through conceptual metaphors.

Authors:  D W Allbritton; G McKoon; R J Gerrig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.