Literature DB >> 35612696

Distinct clinical outcome of microcystic meningioma as a WHO grade 1 meningioma subtype.

Leihao Ren1,2,3, Lingyang Hua1,2,3, Zhongyuan Bao4, Hiroaki Wakimoto5, Ye Gong6,7,8,9, Jiaojiao Deng1,2,3, Daijun Wang1,2,3, Jiawei Chen1,2,3, Hong Chen10, Tareq A Juratli11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, radiology, and long-term outcomes of microcystic meningiomas (MM) and compare it with other subtypes of meningiomas managed at a single neurosurgical center.
METHODS: A total of 87 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection and were diagnosed as MM between 2005 and 2016 were enrolled for analysis. Clinicopathological, radiology, and prognostic information was collected and analyzed. Progression free survival (PFS) was compared with 659 patients with other subtypes of WHO grade 1 meningiomas and 167 patients with atypical meningiomas treated during the same period.
RESULTS: Fifty six females and 31 males with MM were analyzed. Peri-tumor brain edema was frequent on T2 WI (85%).12 patients (13.8%) experienced tumor progression during the mean follow-up of 101.66 ± 40.92 months. The median PFS was unavailable, and the 5, 10, and 15 year progression-free rates were 96.9%, 84.0%, and 73.9%, respectively. Univariate COX analysis demonstrated skull base location and higher Ki-67 index as significant negative prognostic factors for PFS (P < 0.05); multivariate analysis identified tumor location and Ki-67 index as independent factors (P < 0.01), as well. Of note, the PFS of MM was worse than other WHO grade 1 subtypes (P < 0.001), but better than atypical meningiomas (P < 0.001), and the PFS differences were retained even when the analysis was limited to the patients receiving GTR (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The PFS of MM was worse than other WHO grade 1 subtypes and better than atypical meningiomas. Skull base location and higher Ki-67 index were independent negative prognostic factors in MM.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microcystic meningioma; Prognosis; Progression free survival; WHO grade 1 meningioma

Year:  2022        PMID: 35612696     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04034-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  29 in total

1.  Microcystic meningioma presenting as a cystic lesion with an enhancing mural nodule in elderly women: report of three cases.

Authors:  Arvind Rishi; Karen S Black; Rona W Woldenberg; Chris M Overby; Mark B Eisenberg; Jian Yi Li
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Proliferation and progesterone receptor status in benign meningiomas are not age dependent.

Authors:  Florian Roser; Makoto Nakamura; Rainer Ritz; Mattia Bellinzona; Klaus Dietz; Madjid Samii; Marcos S Tatagiba
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Long-term follow-up of surgical resection of microcystic meningiomas.

Authors:  M Yashar S Kalani; Claudio Cavallo; Stephen W Coons; Salvatore C Lettieri; Peter Nakaji; Randall W Porter; Robert F Spetzler; Iman Feiz-Erfan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 4.  Microcystic meningioma of the calvarium: a series of 9 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  José E Velázquez Vega; Andrew E Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014-2018.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Gino Cioffi; Kristin Waite; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 13.029

6.  Characteristic features and proposed classification in 69 cases of intracranial microcystic meningiomas.

Authors:  Zhiqin Lin; Meng Zhao; Xiangrong Li; Junmei Wang; Ping Qiu; Folin Lan; Celin Guan; Dongxia Liao; Dongwei Shen; Jing Lu; Shuanglin Que; Zhongli Jiang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review.

Authors:  J Watts; G Box; A Galvin; P Brotchie; N Trost; T Sutherland
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-01-08

8.  Differentiation of benign angiomatous and microcystic meningiomas with extensive peritumoral edema from high grade meningiomas with aid of diffusion weighted MRI.

Authors:  Avetis Azizyan; Paula Eboli; Doniel Drazin; James Mirocha; Marcel M Maya; Serguei Bannykh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Identification of shared genomic aberrations between angiomatous and microcystic meningiomas.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kuroi; Hiroyuki Akagawa; Makoto Shibuya; Hideaki Onda; Tatsuya Maegawa; Hidetoshi Kasuya
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2019-09-28

Review 10.  The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Pieter Wesseling; Daniel J Brat; Ian A Cree; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Cynthia Hawkins; H K Ng; Stefan M Pfister; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Andreas von Deimling; David W Ellison
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.