Literature DB >> 35610970

Elasticity-associated rebinding rate of molecular bonds between soft elastic media.

Qiangzeng Huang1, Kuncheng He2, Jizeng Wang3.   

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of how cells interact with their extracellular matrix via molecular bonds is fundamental for many important processes in cell biology and engineering. In these interactions, the deformability of cells and matrix are usually comparable with that of the bonds, making their rebinding events globally coupled with the deformation states of whole systems. Unfortunately, this important principle is not realized or adopted in most conventional theoretical models for analyzing cellular adhesions. In this study, we considered a new theoretical model of a cluster of ligand-receptor bonds between two soft elastic bodies, in which the rebinding rates of ligands to receptors are described, by considering the deformation of the overall system under the influence of bond distributions. On the basis of theory of continuum and statistical mechanics, we obtained an elasticity-associated rebinding rate of open bonds in a closed analytical form that highly depends on the binding states and distributions of all other bonds as well as on the overall deformation energy stored in the elastic bodies and all closed bonds. On the basis of this elasticity-associated rebinding rate and by performing Monte Carlo simulations, we uncovered new mechanisms underlying the adhesion stability of molecular-bond clusters associated with deformable elastic bodies. Moreover, we revealed that the rebinding processes of molecular bonds is not only dependent on interfacial separation but is related to overall energy. This newly proposed rebinding rate may substantially improve our understanding of how cells adapt to their microenvironments by adjusting their mechanical properties through cytoskeleton remodeling.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35610970      PMCID: PMC9279355          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  38 in total

Review 1.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Impact of receptor-ligand distance on adhesion cluster stability.

Authors:  T Erdmann; U S Schwarz
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Extending Bell's model: how force transducer stiffness alters measured unbinding forces and kinetics of molecular complexes.

Authors:  Emily B Walton; Sunyoung Lee; Krystyn J Van Vliet
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Probing mechanical principles of focal contacts in cell-matrix adhesion with a coupled stochastic-elastic modelling framework.

Authors:  Huajian Gao; Jin Qian; Bin Chen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Predicted rupture force of a single molecular bond becomes rate independent at ultralow loading rates.

Authors:  Dechang Li; Baohua Ji
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Hippo pathway effectors control cardiac progenitor cell fate by acting as dynamic sensors of substrate mechanics and nanostructure.

Authors:  Diogo Mosqueira; Stefania Pagliari; Koichiro Uto; Mitsuhiro Ebara; Sara Romanazzo; Carmen Escobedo-Lucea; Jun Nakanishi; Akiyoshi Taniguchi; Ornella Franzese; Paolo Di Nardo; Marie José Goumans; Enrico Traversa; Perpetua Pinto-do-Ó; Takao Aoyagi; Giancarlo Forte
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Control of Mechanotransduction by Molecular Clutch Dynamics.

Authors:  Alberto Elosegui-Artola; Xavier Trepat; Pere Roca-Cusachs
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 20.808

8.  Mechanosensitivity of Cancer Cells in Contact with Soft Substrates Using AFM.

Authors:  Yara Abidine; Andrei Constantinescu; Valérie M Laurent; Vinoth Sundar Rajan; Richard Michel; Valentin Laplaud; Alain Duperray; Claude Verdier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Lamellipodium is a myosin-independent mechanosensor.

Authors:  Patrick W Oakes; Tamara C Bidone; Yvonne Beckham; Austin V Skeeters; Guillermina R Ramirez-San Juan; Stephen P Winter; Gregory A Voth; Margaret L Gardel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate.

Authors:  Justin R Tse; Adam J Engler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Unified multiscale theory of cellular mechanical adaptations to substrate stiffness.

Authors:  Peng-Cheng Chen; Xi-Qiao Feng; Bo Li
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.699

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.