N Saadat1, F Azizi2, H Abdi2, A Amouzegar3. 1. Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box, 19395-4763, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. 3. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box, 19395-4763, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. amouzegar@endocrine.ac.ir.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the time to achieve euthyroidism and sustained control of hyperthyroidism after treatment with radioactive iodine (RAI) or long-term methimazole (LT-MMI) in patients with post-RAI relapsed hyperthyroidism. METHODS: Sixty four patients with recurrence of hyperthyroidism after RAI treatment were randomly assigned to either RAI or LT-MMI treatment. Both groups were followed every 1-3 months in the first year and then every 6 months for a total of 60 months. RESULTS: In RAI and LT-MMI groups, mean age was 49.0 ± 12.1 and 50.1 ± 14.6 years and time of relapse of hyperthyroidism after previous RAI treatment was 23.2 ± 18.8 and 20.8 ± 17.1 months, respectively. At the end of study, in the LT-MMI group, 31 (97%) and 1 (3%) were euthyroid and hypothyroid, respectively; in the RAI group, 8 (25%) patients were euthyroid, whereas 18 (56%), 3 (9.5%) and 3 (9.5%) had overt hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, respectively. Mean time to euthyroidism was 9.4 ± 5.0 months in the RAI group and 3.5 ± 2.8 months in the LT-MMI group (p < 0.001). Patients in the RAI group spent 77.7 ± 14.0 percent and those in the LT-MMI group spent 95.2 ± 5.9 percent of 60 months in the euthyroid state (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with post-RAI relapse of hyperthyroidism, LT-MMI treatment was superior to radioiodine because of faster achievement of euthyroidism and more sustained control of hyperthyroidism during 60 months of follow-up.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the time to achieve euthyroidism and sustained control of hyperthyroidism after treatment with radioactive iodine (RAI) or long-term methimazole (LT-MMI) in patients with post-RAI relapsed hyperthyroidism. METHODS: Sixty four patients with recurrence of hyperthyroidism after RAI treatment were randomly assigned to either RAI or LT-MMI treatment. Both groups were followed every 1-3 months in the first year and then every 6 months for a total of 60 months. RESULTS: In RAI and LT-MMI groups, mean age was 49.0 ± 12.1 and 50.1 ± 14.6 years and time of relapse of hyperthyroidism after previous RAI treatment was 23.2 ± 18.8 and 20.8 ± 17.1 months, respectively. At the end of study, in the LT-MMI group, 31 (97%) and 1 (3%) were euthyroid and hypothyroid, respectively; in the RAI group, 8 (25%) patients were euthyroid, whereas 18 (56%), 3 (9.5%) and 3 (9.5%) had overt hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, respectively. Mean time to euthyroidism was 9.4 ± 5.0 months in the RAI group and 3.5 ± 2.8 months in the LT-MMI group (p < 0.001). Patients in the RAI group spent 77.7 ± 14.0 percent and those in the LT-MMI group spent 95.2 ± 5.9 percent of 60 months in the euthyroid state (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with post-RAI relapse of hyperthyroidism, LT-MMI treatment was superior to radioiodine because of faster achievement of euthyroidism and more sustained control of hyperthyroidism during 60 months of follow-up.