Literature DB >> 35610415

Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays.

Adam C Vilanova-Goldstein1, Greg Huffman2,3, James R Brockmole2.   

Abstract

Attentional selection is driven, in part, by a complex interplay between endogenous and exogenous cues. Recently, one's interactions with the physical world have also been shown to bias attention. Specifically, the sense of agency that arises when our actions cause predictable outcomes biases our attention toward those things which we control. We investigated how this agency-driven attentional bias interacts with simultaneously presented endogenous (words) and exogenous (color singletons) environmental cues. Participants controlled the movement of one object while others moved independently. In a subsequent search task, targets were either the previously controlled objects or not. Targets were also validly or invalidly cued. Both cue types influenced attention allocation. Endogenous cues and agency-driven attentional selection were independent and additive, indicating they are separable mechanisms of selection. In contrast, exogenous cues eliminated the effects of agency, indicating that perceptually salient environmental cues can override internally derived effects of agency. This is the first demonstration of a boundary condition on agency-driven selection.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Cognitive and attentional control; Perception and Action; Selective

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35610415     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02507-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

1.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Motion onset captures attention.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Shawn E Christ
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

3.  An online neural substrate for sense of agency.

Authors:  Valerian Chambon; Dorit Wenke; Stephen M Fleming; Wolfgang Prinz; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Benoit Brisson; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  The "sense of agency" and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole David; Albert Newen; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2008-04-18

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course.

Authors:  H E Egeth; S Yantis
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Agency attribution: event-related potentials and outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Jeffery G Bednark; Elizabeth A Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.