Literature DB >> 3561006

An evaluation of operative outcome in patients with funnel chest diagnosed by means of the computed tomogram.

K Nakahara, K Ohno, S Miyoshi, H Maeda, Y Monden, Y Kawashima.   

Abstract

A questionnaire survey of 66 patients with funnel chest who underwent corrective surgical procedures by the sternal elevation method, with or without the application of metal strut, demonstrated that the operative result was good in 60.6% and fair in 39.4%. None of the patients rated the result as unsatisfactory. A computed tomogram of the chest wall was performed to study the depression (b/c), asymmetry (b'/b), and flatness (a/b) of the chest wall, where a was the maximum transverse distance of the chest wall, b and b' were the maximum distance from the anterior to the posterior chest wall at the left and right sides (b greater than b'), and c was the perpendicular distance from the point of the anterior chest wall at its greatest deformity to the level of the anterior tip of the spine. In patients with a good result, b/c and b'/b were well corrected, while in patients with a fair postoperative result, they were still significantly different from those in subjects with normal chest walls. Moreover, 85.7% of the patients (6/7) with b/c over 3.0 before operation had a fair postoperative result. The degree of a/b was not corrected in patients with either good or fair postoperative results. We conclude that an operative approach to lengthen ribs would be necessary to improve the degree of a/b, that in patients with severely depressed funnel chest, expressed as a b/c value over 3.0 by computed tomography, a transient support with struts should be applied, and finally, that a more careful approach for correction of asymmetry should be undertaken to improve the operative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3561006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Radiologic factors related to double-bar insertion in minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim; Ki Yeol Lee; Jung Bok Lee; Kyung-Sook Yang; Jinwook Hwang; Bo Kyung Je; Hyung Joo Park
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Radiological assessment of children with pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Arturas Kilda; Algidas Basevicius; Vidmantas Barauskas; Saulius Lukosevicius; Donatas Ragaisis
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Evolving management of pectus excavatum based on a single institutional experience of 664 patients.

Authors:  J A Haller; L R Scherer; C S Turner; P M Colombani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Cine MRI of the thorax in patients with pectus excavatum].

Authors:  K A Herrmann; C Zech; T Strauss; R Hatz; S Schoenberg; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with pectus excavatum compared with normal controls.

Authors:  Roya S Saleh; J Paul Finn; Michael Fenchel; Abbas Nasirae Moghadam; Mayil Krishnam; Marlon Abrazado; Anthony Ton; Reza Habibi; Eric W Fonkalsrud; Christopher B Cooper
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Variation of the Anthropometric Index for pectus excavatum relative to age, race, and sex.

Authors:  Eduardo Baldassari Rebeis; Jose Ribas Milanez de Campos; Luis Felipe Pinho Moreira; Antonio Carlos Pastorino; Paulo Manuel Pêgo-Fernandes; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.