Literature DB >> 35608809

The prototype of a preference-based index of weight-related quality of life: demonstrating the possibilities.

Ana M Moga1,2, Laurie K Twells3, Nancy E Mayo4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evidence for comparative and cost-effectiveness of weight-loss interventions is lacking as there are no obesity-specific measures fit for this purpose. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which a prototype of a brief, multi-dimensional obesity-specific Preference-Based Index of Weight-Related Quality of Life (PBI-WRQL) could fill this gap.
METHODS: Longitudinal data from a Canadian bariatric cohort was used. Forty-eight items from the IWQoL-Lite, EQ-5D-3L, and SF-12V2 were mapped onto the WHO ICF domains, and one item was chosen for the dimension based on fit to the Rasch model. Individuals' health ratings (0-100) were regressed on each dimension, and the regression coefficients for the response options were used as weights to generate a total score. Generalized estimation equations were used to compare measure parameters across groups and levels of converging constructs.
RESULTS: Pre-surgery data were available on 201 people (Women: 82%; BMI: 48.8 ± 6.7 kg/m2; age: 43 ± 9.0 years) and on 125 (62%) at 6 months post-bariatric surgery. Seven dimensions with three response options formed the PB-WRQL prototype: Mobility/Physical Function, Pain, Depression, Participation, Energy, Peripheral Edema, and Dyspnea. The prototype showed substantial change (mean + 40) with bariatric surgery, higher than the EQ-5D (mean + 11.5). The prototype showed the strongest relationship with BMI at baseline (t = - 3.68) and was the most sensitive to change in BMI (t = - 3.42).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a brief, 7-dimension index weighted by health impact performed as well as the 31-item IWQoL-Lite and better than the EQ-5D-3L. These findings demonstrate the potential value of the brief PB-WRQL prototype index and support its further development using preference weights to reflect the current generation's needs and concerns.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric; Disease-specific measure; Health related quality of life (HRQOL); Instrument development; Laparoscopic; Obesity; Preference-based measure (PBM); Questionnaire; Rasch analysis; Sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35608809     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03156-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   3.440


  49 in total

Review 1.  Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going?

Authors:  S Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  John Cawley; Chad Meyerhoefer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; James R Cerhan; Alan J Flint; Lindsay Hannan; Robert J MacInnis; Steven C Moore; Geoffrey S Tobias; Hoda Anton-Culver; Laura Beane Freeman; W Lawrence Beeson; Sandra L Clipp; Dallas R English; Aaron R Folsom; D Michal Freedman; Graham Giles; Niclas Hakansson; Katherine D Henderson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Jane A Hoppin; Karen L Koenig; I-Min Lee; Martha S Linet; Yikyung Park; Gaia Pocobelli; Arthur Schatzkin; Howard D Sesso; Elisabete Weiderpass; Bradley J Willcox; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Walter C Willett; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Improvement in health-related quality of life in first year after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Vincenzo Pilone; Enrico Mozzi; Angelo M Schettino; Francesco Furbetta; Antonio Di Maro; Cristiano Giardiello; Marco Battistoni; Angelo Gardinazzi; Giancarlo Micheletto; Nicola Perrotta; Luca Busetto
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.734

5.  The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Richard A Berzon; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; Carol M Moinpour; Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The association between BMI and health-related quality of life in the US population: sex, age and ethnicity matters.

Authors:  M Laxy; C Teuner; R Holle; C Kurz
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Impact of metabolic comorbidity on the association between body mass index and health-related quality of life: a Scotland-wide cross-sectional study of 5,608 participants.

Authors:  Zia Ul-Haq; Daniel F Mackay; Elisabeth Fenwick; Jill P Pell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Physiological adaptations to weight loss and factors favouring weight regain.

Authors:  F L Greenway
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Morbidity and health-related quality of life of patients accessing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-centre cross-sectional study in one province of Canada.

Authors:  Laurie K Twells; Shannon Driscoll; Deborah M Gregory; Kendra Lester; John M Fardy; Dave Pace
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 10.  Altered gut and adipose tissue hormones in overweight and obese individuals: cause or consequence?

Authors:  M E J Lean; D Malkova
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  1 in total

1.  Introduction to the special section "Reducing research waste in (health-related) quality of life research".

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Jan R Boehnke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.