Literature DB >> 3560877

Variation of lumbar spine stiffness with load.

W T Edwards, W C Hayes, I Posner, A A White, R W Mann.   

Abstract

Mechanical studies of the Functional Spinal Unit (FSU) in-vitro have shown that the slopes of the load-displacement curves increase with load. This nonlinearity implies that the stiffness of the FSU is not constant over the range of physiologic loads, and that measurements obtained for FSU specimens through the application of individual loads cannot be summed to predict the response of the specimens to combined loads. Both experimental and analytical methods were developed in the present study to better quantify the nonlinear FSU load-displacement response and to calculate the coupled stiffness of FSU specimens at combined states of load reflecting in-vivo conditions. Results referenced to the center of the vertebral body indicate that lumbar FSU specimens are stiffer in flexion than in extension, and that FSU specimens loaded in flexion are stiffer at high loads than at low loads. The importance of combined load testing and a nonlinear interpretation of load-displacement data is demonstrated.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3560877     DOI: 10.1115/1.3138639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  8 in total

1.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  The effect of loading rate and degeneration on neutral region motion in human cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin Zhao; Emir Boumediene; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  In vitro spine testing using a robot-based testing system: comparison of displacement control and "hybrid control".

Authors:  Kevin M Bell; Robert A Hartman; Lars G Gilbertson; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Matthew McDonnell; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  M R Gudavalli; T Potluri; G Carandang; R M Havey; L I Voronov; J M Cox; R M Rowell; R A Kruse; G C Joachim; A G Patwardhan; C N R Henderson; C Goertz
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  In vivo measurements of spinal stiffness according to a stepwise increase of axial load.

Authors:  Lea Suzanne Glaus; Léonie Hofstetter; Alexandros Guekos; Petra Schweinhardt; Jaap Swanenburg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) utilizing a pendulum testing system.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; David J Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Mark A Palumbo; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.