Rita de Cássia Dias Viana Andrade1, Thaís Azevedo Reis2, Luciano Pereira Rosa3, Gabriel Pinto de Oliveira Santos3, Francine da CristinaSilva3. 1. Cruzeiro Do Sul University, Paulista Avenue, 1415 Centro, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01311-925, Brazil. 2. Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Rio de Contas Street, 58 Candeias, Bahia, 450029-094, Brazil. tazevedo011@gmail.com. 3. Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Rio de Contas Street, 58 Candeias, Bahia, 450029-094, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As conventional treatments currently available for mucositis are not considerably effective, there is a need to implement an adjuvant protocol for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) mediated by curcumin and blue LED as an adjunct treatment of oral mucositis for oncology patients using chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. METHODS: Clinical, randomized study, in a single location, in an oncology service of a general hospital, with a total of 30 patients (over 18 years old) with stable oral mucosa lesions in the process of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: control group (treated with nystatin), PBM group (treated with low-level laser therapy), and the aPDT group (treated with 450-nm blue LED and curcumin photosensitizer). RESULTS: The results showed, by means of intra-group comparisons, that the two experimental treatments promoted yeast reduction of the genus Candida in the last two evaluations (21 days and 30 days), but not in the first two evaluations (7 days and 14 days). The intra-group comparisons showed that the control and aPDT group showed a significant difference in the degree of mucositis over the four evaluations performed, with the results pointing out that the mucositis worsened in the control group from the 14th day, while reduced in the aPDT group from the 21st day of treatment. CONCLUSION: A reduction in the degree of mucositis and pain score was observed in the PBM and aPDT groups, with the aPDT group standing out when presenting early clinical improvement in relation to the PBM group and the control group, thus emphasizing its effectiveness within the desired aspects. Regarding the antimicrobial effect, aPDT showed a greater reduction of yeasts of the genus Candida in the tested parameters.
INTRODUCTION: As conventional treatments currently available for mucositis are not considerably effective, there is a need to implement an adjuvant protocol for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) mediated by curcumin and blue LED as an adjunct treatment of oral mucositis for oncology patients using chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. METHODS: Clinical, randomized study, in a single location, in an oncology service of a general hospital, with a total of 30 patients (over 18 years old) with stable oral mucosa lesions in the process of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: control group (treated with nystatin), PBM group (treated with low-level laser therapy), and the aPDT group (treated with 450-nm blue LED and curcumin photosensitizer). RESULTS: The results showed, by means of intra-group comparisons, that the two experimental treatments promoted yeast reduction of the genus Candida in the last two evaluations (21 days and 30 days), but not in the first two evaluations (7 days and 14 days). The intra-group comparisons showed that the control and aPDT group showed a significant difference in the degree of mucositis over the four evaluations performed, with the results pointing out that the mucositis worsened in the control group from the 14th day, while reduced in the aPDT group from the 21st day of treatment. CONCLUSION: A reduction in the degree of mucositis and pain score was observed in the PBM and aPDT groups, with the aPDT group standing out when presenting early clinical improvement in relation to the PBM group and the control group, thus emphasizing its effectiveness within the desired aspects. Regarding the antimicrobial effect, aPDT showed a greater reduction of yeasts of the genus Candida in the tested parameters.
Authors: Michelle Bernardes Fonseca; Paulo Odair Tessare Júnior; Raul Capp Pallota; Hely Ferreira Filho; Odilon Victor Porto Denardin; Abrão Rapoport; Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis; João Francisco Veronezi; Walter João Genovese; Ana Lucia Franco Ricardo Journal: Photomed Laser Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Patrizia Agostinis; Kristian Berg; Keith A Cengel; Thomas H Foster; Albert W Girotti; Sandra O Gollnick; Stephen M Hahn; Michael R Hamblin; Asta Juzeniene; David Kessel; Mladen Korbelik; Johan Moan; Pawel Mroz; Dominika Nowis; Jacques Piette; Brian C Wilson; Jakub Golab Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Waseem Jerjes; Tahwinder Upile; Zaid Hamdoon; Charles Alexander Mosse; Sarah Akram; Colin Hopper Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Stephen T Sonis; Linda S Elting; Dorothy Keefe; Douglas E Peterson; Mark Schubert; Martin Hauer-Jensen; B Nebiyou Bekele; Judith Raber-Durlacher; J Peter Donnelly; Edward B Rubenstein Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andy Trotti; Lisa A Bellm; Joel B Epstein; Diana Frame; Henry J Fuchs; Clement K Gwede; Eugene Komaroff; Luba Nalysnyk; Marya D Zilberberg Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Karis Kin-Fong Cheng; S F Leung; Raymond H S Liang; Josepha W M Tai; Rebecca M W Yeung; David R Thompson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-11-15 Impact factor: 3.603