Literature DB >> 35608484

The Effect of a Liberal Approach to Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial.

Alexis P Poole1,2,3, Mark E Finnis1,2,3,4, James Anstey4,5, Rinaldo Bellomo3,4,6, Shailesh Bihari7, Vishwanath Biradar8, Sarah Doherty5, Glenn Eastwood3,4,6, Simon Finfer9, Craig J French4,10, Simon Heller11, Michael Horowitz12,13, Palash Kar1,2, Peter S Kruger14,15, Matthew J Maiden1,2,16, Johan Mårtensson17, Colin J McArthur18, Shay P McGuinness19, Paul J Secombe3,20, Antony E Tobin4,21, Andrew A Udy3,22, Paul J Young3,4,23,24, Adam M Deane4,5.   

Abstract

Rationale: Blood glucose concentrations affect outcomes in critically ill patients, but the optimal target blood glucose range in those with type 2 diabetes is unknown.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of a "liberal" approach to targeted blood glucose range during ICU admission.
Methods: This mutlicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial included 419 adult patients with type 2 diabetes expected to be in the ICU on at least three consecutive days. In the intervention group intravenous insulin was commenced at a blood glucose >252 mg/dl and titrated to a target range of 180-252 mg/dl. In the comparator group insulin was commenced at a blood glucose >180 mg/dl and titrated to a target range of 108-180 mg/dl. The primary outcome was incident hypoglycemia (<72 mg/dl). Secondary outcomes included glucose metrics and clinical outcomes. Measurements and Main
Results: By Day 28, at least one episode of hypoglycemia occurred in 10 of 210 (5%) patients assigned the intervention and 38 of 209 (18%) patients assigned the comparator (incident rate ratio, 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09 to 0.49]; P < 0.001). Those assigned the intervention had greater blood glucose concentrations (daily mean, minimum, maximum), less glucose variability, and less relative hypoglycemia (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). By Day 90, 62 of 210 (29.5%) in the intervention and 52 of 209 (24.9%) in the comparator group had died (absolute difference, 4.6 percentage points [95% CI, -3.9% to 13.2%]; P = 0.29). Conclusions: A liberal approach to blood glucose targets reduced incident hypoglycemia but did not improve patient-centered outcomes. Clinical trial registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12616001135404).

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose; critical illness; diabetes; hypoglycemia; intensive care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35608484     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0329OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   30.528


  1 in total

1.  What is new in perioperative dysglycemia?

Authors:  Micah T Long; Alexandra L Anderson; Timothy B Curry
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 41.787

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.