| Literature DB >> 35607895 |
Lang Pan1, Lu Chen1, Jun Lv1,2,3, Yuanjie Pang1, Yu Guo4, Pei Pei5, Huaidong Du6,7, Ling Yang6,7, Iona Y Millwood6,7, Robin G Walters6,7, Yiping Chen6,7, Weiwei Gong8, Junshi Chen9, Canqing Yu1,2, Zhengming Chen7, Liming Li1,2.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have assessed the role of individual plasma cholesterol levels in the association between egg consumption and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This research aims to simultaneously explore the associations of self-reported egg consumption with plasma metabolic markers and these markers with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).Entities:
Keywords: biochemistry; cardiovascular diseases; chemical biology; egg consumption; epidemiology; global health; human; lipoproteins; metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35607895 PMCID: PMC9129873 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Elife ISSN: 2050-084X Impact factor: 8.713
Baseline characteristics among 4,778 participants.
| Controls | MI cases | IS cases | ICH cases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1,377 | 946 | 1217 | 1238 |
| Age, y | 46.87 (0.20) | 52.42 (0.24) | 42.51 (0.22) | 47.38 (0.21) |
| Female, % | 50.26 | 40.40 | 55.87 | 51.54 |
| Urban residents, % | 27.13 | 28.90 | 36.88 | 23.37 |
| Middle school or above, % | 56.97 | 53.84 | 53.70 | 56.36 |
| Income ≥35,000 Yuan/year, % | 9.98 | 12.84 | 12.89 | 10.60 |
| Manual worker, % | 69.88 | 68.39 | 69.12 | 71.50 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.56 (0.09) | 24.03 (0.12) | 24.27 (0.10) | 24.20 (0.10) |
| SBP, mmHg | 127.94 (0.64) | 136.96 (0.82) | 136.46 (0.72) | 149.76 (0.68) |
| DBP, mmHg | 76.97 (0.36) | 82.05 (0.47) | 82.57 (0.41) | 89.35 (0.39) |
| RBG, mmol/L | 5.63 (0.08) | 6.47 (0.10) | 6.19 (0.08) | 6.31 (0.08) |
| Ever regular smoking, % | 34.60 | 40.79 | 38.32 | 36.10 |
| Weekly drinking, % | 18.11 | 15.27 | 18.77 | 20.68 |
| Physical activity, MET-h/d | 23.20 (0.36) | 22.08 (0.46) | 22.72 (0.40) | 23.26 (0.38) |
| Eggs consumption, d/w | 2.69 (0.06) | 2.44 (0.07) | 2.62 (0.07) | 2.52 (0.06) |
| Red meat consumption, d/w | 3.26 (0.06) | 3.23 (0.07) | 3.35 (0.06) | 3.31 (0.06) |
| Fresh fruits consumption, d/w | 2.32 (0.05) | 1.91 (0.07) | 2.08 (0.06) | 2.04 (0.06) |
| ≥8 h of fasting, % | 13.65 | 15.04 | 16.69 | 14.86 |
| Poor self-rated health, % | 9.60 | 14.00 | 14.11 | 13.49 |
| Diabetes, % | 5.27 | 10.86 | 8.74 | 8.21 |
| Hypertension, % | 27.06 | 44.47 | 45.00 | 64.66 |
| Family history of diabetes, % | 7.22 | 9.02 | 9.11 | 7.98 |
| Family history of CVD, % | 23.68 | 27.55 | 26.71 | 31.04 |
Results were standardized by age, sex, and region where appropriate. Values are means (standard errors, SE) or %. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RBG, random blood glucose; MET, metabolic equivalent; CVD, cardiovascular disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischemic stroke; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage.
Figure 1.Significant associations of egg consumption and metabolic markers, and associations of these markers with risks of CVD.
Models were adjusted for age, sex, region, education, household income, occupation, marital status, tea-drinking habit, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, self-rated health, fasting time, and frequency of other 11 food groups. Black squares represented coefficients or ORs, while gray horizontal lines represented 95% CI. Significance (Sig.): *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (FDR-adjusted p using the Benjamini-Hochberg method). The source data can be found in .
Figure 2.Global comparison of SD differences of 225 log-transformed metabolic markers associated with weekly days of egg consumption vs.ORs for (A) CVD, (B) MI, (C) IS, and (D) ICH associated with SD higher log-transformed metabolic markers.
Yellow dots represented markers that were associated with egg consumption but not with the risk of diseases. Blue dots represented markers associated with the risk of diseases but not with egg consumption. Red dots represented markers associated with both egg consumption and risk of diseases, with overlapping dots darker in color. The gray horizontal and vertical lines represented 95% CI of coefficients and ORs, respectively. Pearson correlations of coefficients and ORs were annotated in the upper right corner. The source data can be found in Figure 2—source data 1.
Figure 3.Associations of egg consumption and log-transformed metabolic markers.
(A) In basic models, additionally adjusted for (B) BMI, (C) hypertension, (D) diabetes, and (E) family history of diabetes, heart attack or stroke. Significance: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 (FDR-adjusted p using the Benjamini-Hochberg method).
Figure 4.Associations of egg consumption and log-transformed metabolic markers.
(A) In basic models, when (B) restricting the analyses to participants without any metabolic markers below the detection limit or rejected by the quality control (n=4251), and (C) using weekly amount of egg consumption as continuous independent variable instead of its frequency. Significance: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 (FDR-adjusted p using the Benjamini-Hochberg method).