Caitlin E Martin1,2,3, Anna Beth Parlier-Ahmad4, Lori Beck5, Vashali Jain1, Mishka Terplan6. 1. School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 3. Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 5. Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 6. Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Reproductive and sexual health (RSH) is an important component of wellness and recovery for people with substance use disorder (SUD). Evidence to guide better integration of RSH services into SUD treatment is limited. Our objectives were to compare 1) unmet RSH needs; and 2) barriers to RSH service utilization between care settings providing treatment for SUD or other chronic medical conditions. Methods: Participants at two outpatient clinics, addiction medicine (women n = 91, men n = 75) and primary care (women n = 59, men n = 50), completed a one-time electronic survey between July and September 2019. Separately for men and women, comparisons between addiction medicine and primary care groups were made using Pearson χ2, Fisher's Exact, and T-tests. Results: Participants were 75.0% Black and aged 49.4 years. Overall, unmet RSH needs were less prevalent among participants at the primary care than the addiction medicine clinic, such as receipt of a past 12-month sexual exam (men: 36.0% vs. 17.3%; women: 55.6% vs. 30.1%). The most common barrier to RSH service receipt was cost (men: 59.4%; women: 52.6%), followed by fear of judgment for drug/alcohol use for SUD participants (men: 33% vs. 12%; women: 26% vs. 7%). Many SUD participants expressed high desire for integrated RSH services into the addiction medicine clinic (men: 51.4%; women: 59.8%). Conclusion/Implications: The integration of RSH into addiction medicine is lagging compared to care settings for people with other chronic medical conditions. Future research should focus on advancing sex- and gender-informed RSH service integration into SUD treatment settings.
Introduction: Reproductive and sexual health (RSH) is an important component of wellness and recovery for people with substance use disorder (SUD). Evidence to guide better integration of RSH services into SUD treatment is limited. Our objectives were to compare 1) unmet RSH needs; and 2) barriers to RSH service utilization between care settings providing treatment for SUD or other chronic medical conditions. Methods: Participants at two outpatient clinics, addiction medicine (women n = 91, men n = 75) and primary care (women n = 59, men n = 50), completed a one-time electronic survey between July and September 2019. Separately for men and women, comparisons between addiction medicine and primary care groups were made using Pearson χ2, Fisher's Exact, and T-tests. Results: Participants were 75.0% Black and aged 49.4 years. Overall, unmet RSH needs were less prevalent among participants at the primary care than the addiction medicine clinic, such as receipt of a past 12-month sexual exam (men: 36.0% vs. 17.3%; women: 55.6% vs. 30.1%). The most common barrier to RSH service receipt was cost (men: 59.4%; women: 52.6%), followed by fear of judgment for drug/alcohol use for SUD participants (men: 33% vs. 12%; women: 26% vs. 7%). Many SUD participants expressed high desire for integrated RSH services into the addiction medicine clinic (men: 51.4%; women: 59.8%). Conclusion/Implications: The integration of RSH into addiction medicine is lagging compared to care settings for people with other chronic medical conditions. Future research should focus on advancing sex- and gender-informed RSH service integration into SUD treatment settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Substance use disorder; gender; reproductive health; sex; sexual health
Authors: Arik V Marcell; Susannah E Gibbs; Nanlesta A Pilgrim; Kathleen R Page; Renata Arrington-Sanders; Jacky M Jennings; Penny S Loosier; Patricia J Dittus Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Daniel J Feaster; Carrigan L Parish; Lauren Gooden; Tim Matheson; Pedro C Castellon; Rui Duan; Yue Pan; Louise F Haynes; Bruce R Schackman; C Kevin Malotte; Raul N Mandler; Grant N Colfax; Lisa R Metsch Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sarah M Temkin; B J Rimel; Amanda S Bruegl; Camille C Gunderson; Anna L Beavis; Kemi M Doll Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.482