| Literature DB >> 35607399 |
Yang Chen1,2, Yan Xu1,2, Guoyu Dai1,2, Qiang Shi1,2,3, Chunyue Duan1,2.
Abstract
Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is among the most common shoulder injuries and is prone to rerupture after surgery. Selecting suitable subpopulations of stem cells as a new specific cell type of mesenchymal stem cells has been increasingly used as a potential therapeutic tool in regenerative medicine. In this study, murine adipose-derived SSEA-4+CD90+PDGFRA+ subpopulation cells were successfully sorted, extracted, and identified. These cells showed good proliferation and differentiation potential, especially in the direction of tendon differentiation, as evidenced by qRT-PCR and immunofluorescence. Subsequently, we established a murine rotator cuff injury model and repaired it with subpopulation cells. Our results showed that the subpopulation cells embedded in a fibrin sealant significantly improved the histological score, as well as the biomechanical strength of the repaired tendon enthesis at four weeks after surgery, compared with the other groups. Hence, these findings indicated that the subpopulation of cells could augment the repaired enthesis and lead to better outcomes, thereby reducing the retear rate after rotator cuff repair. Our study provides a potential therapeutic strategy for rotator cuff healing in the future.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35607399 PMCID: PMC9124132 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1309684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.131
Figure 1Schematic diagram showing the study design of adipose-derived subpopulation cells.
Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analysis.
| Markers of tenogenic genes | Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| EGR1 | |
| Forward TCGGCTCCTTTCCTCACTCA | |
| Reverse CTCATAGGGTTGTTCGCTCGG | |
| SCX | Forward CTGGCCTCCAGCTACATTTCT |
| TNMD | Forward ACACTTCTGGCCCGAGGTAT |
| GAPDH | Forward AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG |
Figure 2The characteristics of the subpopulation cells isolated from mouse adipose tissue. (a) Flow cytometry for the subpopulation cells. (b) Morphology of the subpopulation cells at different passages; scale bar = 200 μm. (c) Colony-forming unit assay of subpopulation cells after 10 days of culture; scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 3Proliferation and trilineage differentiation potential between ADSCs and the subpopulation cells. (a) Proliferation for both groups was determined using a CCK-8 assay. (b) Alizarin Red staining, Oil Red O staining, and Alcian Blue staining of the two groups after a 21-day culture. (c) Quantification of the extent of in vitro osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation between ADSCs and the subpopulation cells. Scale bar = 20 μm, ∗P < 0.05. ns means no difference.
Figure 4Tenogenic differentiation of ADSCs and subpopulation cells in vitro. (a) Tenogenic gene (EGR1, SCX, and TNMD) expression compared between ADSCs and the subpopulation cells. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01. EGR1: early growth response1; Scx: scleraxis; Tnmd: tenomodulin. (b) Immunofluorescence for Tnmd expression of the two groups after 14 days of tenogenic induction and positive staining area of TNMD. Scale bar = 20 μm. (c) Picrosirius red staining for both groups. Scale bar on the left = 1 mm, scale bar on the right = 100 μm.
Figure 5Representative pictures of the supraspinatus tendon humeral head insertion at postoperative four weeks. (a) H&E staining and TB staining images for all groups. (b) Modified tendon maturing score of the repaired enthesis. Area outlined by the dotted line represents the tendon enthesis. Scale bar = 200 μm. ∗P < 0.05.