Literature DB >> 35607380

New approaches in ovarian cancer based on genetics and carcinogenesis hypotheses (Review).

Raluca Ana-Maria Mogos1,2, Razvan Popovici1,3, Adina Elena Tanase3, Tudor Calistru2, Paula Popovici4, Mihaela Grigore1,3, Alexandru Carauleanu1,3.   

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological malignancies and its incidence is rising in the last decades especially in developed countries. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represents 70% of ovarian cancers. Oral contraceptive use and salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy are well known protective factors against development of ovarian cancer. Identification of specific mutations associated with a high risk of developing ovarian cancer, especially BRCA1/2 mutation and TP53 mutations, has paved the way for implementation of new strategies for early diagnosis and therapy. Hereditary forms of ovarian cancer account for 5-10% and have BRCA1/2 gene mutations or TP53 mutations. BRCA1/2 gene mutations appear in 22% of HGSOC and are associated with the defective homologous repair (HR)/DNA repair pathway. Genetic testing in ovarian cancer is important for risk assessment and therapeutic options. Although 'universal genetic testing' is not recommended yet, the procedure remains highly recommended in women with high risk. Genes involved in the development of ovarian cancer as TP53 may be targeted by gene therapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may enhance the cytotoxic effect of DNA-damaging chemotherapy, and induce synthetic lethality in cases with BRCA1/2 mutations. Other strategies are designed to target pathways driven by various gene mutations, including the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or the use of drugs, which target growth factors, or epigenetic events including methylation, and acetylation of genes. The tubal involvement in ovarian carcinogenesis provides an important tool for the clinician to implement risk-reducing strategies including salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy in high-risk cases at appropriate ages.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogenesis; genes; ovarian cancer; risk-reducing strategies; targeted therapy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35607380      PMCID: PMC9121196          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.751


  38 in total

Review 1.  Overview of CD24 as a new molecular marker in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vahideh Tarhriz; Mojgan Bandehpour; Siavoush Dastmalchi; Elaheh Ouladsahebmadarek; Habib Zarredar; Shirin Eyvazi
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  The Dualistic Model of Ovarian Carcinogenesis: Revisited, Revised, and Expanded.

Authors:  Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy.

Authors:  C Bethan Powell; Eric Kenley; Lee-May Chen; Beth Crawford; Jane McLennan; Charles Zaloudek; Miriam Komaromy; Mary Beattie; John Ziegler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Ovarian Cancers: Genetic Abnormalities, Tumor Heterogeneity and Progression, Clonal Evolution and Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Eleonora Petrucci; Luca Pasquini; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  Population distribution of lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Malcolm C Pike; Paul D P Pharoah; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Daniel O Stram; Roberta B Ness; Douglas A Stram; Lynda D Roman; Claire Templeman; Alice W Lee; Usha Menon; Peter A Fasching; Jessica N McAlpine; Jennifer A Doherty; Francesmary Modugno; Joellen M Schildkraut; Mary Anne Rossing; David G Huntsman; Anna H Wu; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Hereditary ovarian cancer: not only BRCA 1 and 2 genes.

Authors:  Angela Toss; Chiara Tomasello; Elisabetta Razzaboni; Giannina Contu; Giovanni Grandi; Angelo Cagnacci; Russell J Schilder; Laura Cortesi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Tumor evolution and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Soochi Kim; Youngjin Han; Se Ik Kim; Hee-Seung Kim; Seong Jin Kim; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 9.  The Association and Significance of p53 in Gynecologic Cancers: The Potential of Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Takeshi Obata; Takiko Daikoku; Hiroshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Epigenetic therapy for ovarian cancer: promise and progress.

Authors:  Sara Moufarrij; Monica Dandapani; Elisa Arthofer; Stephanie Gomez; Aneil Srivastava; Micael Lopez-Acevedo; Alejandro Villagra; Katherine B Chiappinelli
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.