| Literature DB >> 35607336 |
Tanja Charlotte Frederiksen1,2, Kirstine Calloe3, Michelle Geryk3, Henrik Kjærulf Jensen1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Brugada syndrome; Cardiac sodium channel; Conduction; Genetic variant; Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35607336 PMCID: PMC9123313 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.01.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HeartRhythm Case Rep ISSN: 2214-0271
Figure 1A: Electrocardiogram (ECG) at time of admission. PR interval was prolonged (230 ms). Q waves were present in the anterior and inferior leads, as well as poor R wave progression, and there were borderline ST-segment elevations in the precordial leads. B: ECG 2 days after the initial presentation. The atrioventricular conduction had normalized (PR interval 185 ms). There were large, inverted T waves in leads I, II, aVL, aVF, and V2–V6. The QTc interval was prolonged (543 ms corrected with the Fridericia formula). C: ECG 3 weeks after discharge. A Brugada type 1 ECG pattern with coved ST-segment elevation >2 mm and inverted T waves was observed in leads V1 and V2. D: ECG 8 years after initial presentation. There was a right bundle branch block. A premature ventricular complex was also observed.
Figure 2Pedigree. Males are represented by squares and females by circles. A clear symbol shows an unaffected individual, while a black symbol shows an affected individual. Deceased individuals are presented with a diagonal line. The arrow shows the proband. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters are presented for affected individuals.
Figure 3Nav1.5 wild-type (WT) or R376L expressed in CHO-K1 cells. A: Whole-cell Nav1.5 WT and R376L currents. B: Peak current density as a function of voltage. C: Voltage dependence of activation. D: Recordings of steady-state currents. E: Voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation.