| Literature DB >> 35606853 |
Rose B Creed1,2, Adeel A Memon1,2,3, Sindhu P Komaragiri1,2, Sandeep K Barodia1,2, Matthew S Goldberg4,5,6.
Abstract
Genetic and neuropathological evidence strongly implicates aberrant forms of α-synuclein in neurodegeneration. Antibodies specific for α-synuclein phosphorylated at serine 129 (pS129) are selective for the pathological protein aggregates that are characteristic of Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies, such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Although the etiology of most synucleinopathies remains uncertain, a large body of evidence points to mitochondrial dysfunction. The recent development of animal models based on intracranial injection of α-synuclein pre-formed fibrils (PFFs) has provided a valuable experimental system in which to study the spread and neurotoxicity of α-synuclein aggregates, yet the effects of PFF-induced protein aggregates on mitochondrial function and dynamics have not been rigorously examined in vivo. To help fill this knowledge gap, we injected the striatum of mice unilaterally with well-characterized small length (< 30 nm) PFFs or monomeric α-synuclein control and measured the distribution and extent of pS129 α-synuclein-immunoreactive aggregates, the loss of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons in the substantia nigra, the abundance of mitochondrial proteins, and the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain components at 3 months and 6 months post injection. Intrastriatal injection of small length PFFs, but not monomeric α-synuclein control, induced robust pS129 α-synuclein immunoreactive inclusions in the cortex, ventral midbrain, and striatum, as well as in rarely reported brain regions, such as the hippocampus, as early as 3 months post injection. Significant loss of nigral tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons was observed in the PFF-injected hemisphere at 3 months and 6 months post injection. The unilateral striatal injection of small length PFFs also caused hemisphere-dependent and treatment-dependent changes in the cortical levels of mitochondrial proteins such as VDAC1, COX-IV, and DRP-1, as well as functional changes in mitochondrial complex I activity in the contralateral striatum. Together, these data demonstrate that intrastriatal injection of mice with small length PFFs induces extensive bilateral protein aggregates, significant unilateral nigral cell loss, and altered contralateral levels of mitochondrial proteins and respiratory chain activity. Our data suggest this animal model may be useful for studying the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in α-synucleinopathies, for studying the hemisphere-dependent effects of α-synuclein aggregates, and for testing neuroprotective therapies that target mitochondrial dysfunction and protein aggregation.Entities:
Keywords: Aggregation; Lewy bodies; Mitochondria; Parkinson’s disease; Pre-formed fibrils; Synuclein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35606853 PMCID: PMC9125944 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-022-01374-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.578
Fig. 1Fibril generation, quality control, and experimental timeline. A Flow chart of procedure used for fibril generation and quality control analysis. B Cup-horn sonicator used to sonicate fibrils. C Electron micrograph of sonicated PFFs diluted 1:300 in PBS and spotted on a formvar-carbon coated EM grid. Scale bar is 100 nm. D Histogram showing the length distribution of sonicated particles measured from the EM micrographs. Fibril lengths were generally uniform with a median length of 29.5 nm. E Histogram of radii of sonicated PFFs measured via dynamic light scattering (median 13.5 nm). F Schematic of intrastriatal injection of 2 μl of either monomer or PFFs followed by euthanasia and harvesting brain for analysis either 3 or 6 months post injection. Ctx: Cortex, Str: Striatum, Thal: Thalamus, vMB: Ventral Midbrain
List of antibodies used for this study
| Antibody | Clone | Dilutions | Host species | Company | Cat. No |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pS129 alpha synuclein | P-syn/81A | 1:10,000 IF | Mouse IgG2a | BioLegend | 825,701 |
| Tyrosine hydroxylase | – | 1:3,000 IHC | Rabbit | Millipore | AB152 |
| VDAC1 | – | 1:1,000 WB | Rabbit | Abcam | Ab15895 |
| COX-IV | 4D11—B3-E8 | 1:2,000 WB | Mouse | Cell signaling | 11967S |
| Tomm-20 | 2F8.1 | 1:1,000 WB | Mouse | Millipore | MABT166 |
| Ndusf4 | EP7832 | 1:1,000 WB | Rabbit | Abcam | Ab137064 |
| DRP1 | D6C7 | 1:1,000 WB | Rabbit | Cell signaling | 8570S |
| OPA1 | D6U6N | 1:1,000 WB | Rabbit | Cell signaling | 80471S |
| FIS1 | JE40-90 | 1:500 WB | Rabbit | Novus biologicals | NBP275691 |
| MIRO1 | CL1083 | 1:500 WB | Mouse | Abcam | Ab188029 |
| GAPDH | 6C5 | 1:10,000 WB | Mouse | Millipore | MAB374 |
Statistical Analyses
| Figure | Comparison | Type of test | Statistic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3B | 3 mo. stereology interaction | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,36) = 0.6118 | |
| 3 mo. stereology hemisphere | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,36) = 3.908 | ||
| 3 mo. stereology treatment | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,36) = 6.667 | p = 0.0140 | |
| 3 mo. Monomer v PFF: Contra | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -619.3 to 2015 | ||
| 3 mo. Monomer v PFF: Ipsi | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: 26.42 to 2751 | ||
| 3 mo. Contra vs Ipsi: Monomer | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -799.1 to 1785 | ||
| 3 mo. Contra vs Ipsi: PFF | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -289.8 to 2568 | ||
| 3C | 3 mo.: % uninjected | Unpaired two-tailed t-test | t = 1.808, df = 18 | |
| 3E | 6 mo. stereology interaction | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,42) = 2.311 | |
| 6 mo. stereology hemisphere | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,42) = 6.765 | ||
| 6 mo. stereology treatment | Two-Way ANOVA | F(1,42) = 2.692 | ||
| 6 mo. Monomer v PFF: Contra | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -724.8 to 780.1 | ||
| 6 mo. Monomer v PFF: Ipsi | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -27.25 to 1478 | ||
| 6 mo. Contra vs Ipsi: Monomer | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -488.0 to 938.8 | ||
| 6 mo. Contra vs Ipsi: PFF | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: 176.8 to 1714 | ||
| 3F | 6 mo.: % uninjected | Unpaired two-tailed t-test | t = 2.286, df = 21 | |
| 4B | 3 mo. VDAC1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 2.969 | |
| 3 mo. VDAC1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28)= 2.969 | ||
| 3 mo. VDAC1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 6.355 | ||
| 3 mo. VDAC1, Ipsi vs Contra: PFF | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -1.045 to -0.01615 | ||
| 3 mo. VDAC1, Monomer v PFF: Contra | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -1.168 to -0.1390 | ||
| 4C | 3 mo. COX-IV Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.1284 | |
| 3 mo. COX-IV Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.1284 | ||
| 3 mo. COX-IV Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 7.425 | ||
| 3 mo. COX-IV, Monomer v PFF: Ipsi | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -2.925 to 0.1175 | ||
| 3 mo. COX-IV, Monomer v PFF: Contra | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -2.599 to 0.4438 | ||
| 4D | 3 mo. Tomm-20 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.4529 | |
| 3 mo. Tomm-20 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.4529 | ||
| 3 mo. Tomm-20 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28)= = 4.356e-0.005 | ||
| 4E | 3 mo. Ndusf4 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.03257 | |
| 3 mo. Ndusf4 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.03257 | ||
| 3 mo. Ndusf4 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.01352 | ||
| 4G | 6 mo. VDAC1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1, 32) = 2.126 | |
| 6 mo. VDAC1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 2.126 | ||
| 6 mo. VDAC1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.1131 | ||
| 6 mo. VDAC1, Ipsi vs Contra: PFF | Sidak’s multiple comparisons | 95% CI: -0.06415 to 0.9943 | ||
| 4H | 6 mo. COX-IV Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 3.299 | |
| 6 mo. COX-IV Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 3.299 | ||
| 6 mo. COX-IV Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.3907 | ||
| 6 mo. COX-IV, Ipsi vs Contra: PFF | Sidak’s multiple comparison | 95% CI: 0.04751 to 1.051 | ||
| 6 mo. COX-IV, Monomer v PFF: Ipsi | Sidak’s multiple comparison | 95% CI: -0.8706 to 0.1326 | ||
| 4I | 6 mo. Tomm-20 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.06019 | |
| 6 mo. Tomm-20 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.06019 | ||
| 6 mo. Tomm-20 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.3443 | ||
| 4 J | 6 mo. Ndusf4 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.02204 | |
| 6 mo. Ndusf4 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.02204 | ||
| 6 mo. Ndusf4 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.01168 | ||
| 5B | 3 mo. DRP1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.2058 | |
| 3 mo. DRP1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.2058 | ||
| 3 mo. DRP1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 7.005 | ||
| 3 mo. DRP1, Monomer vs PFF: Ipsi | Sidak’s multiple comparison | 95% CI:-0.01347 to 0.3597 | ||
| 5C | 3 mo. OPA1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.05688 | |
| 3 mo. OPA1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.05688 | ||
| 3 mo. OPA1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 2.698 | ||
| 5D | 3 mo. FIS1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.003612 | |
| 3 mo. FIS1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.003612 | ||
| 3 mo. FIS1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.06165 | ||
| 5E | 3 mo. MIRO Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.3095 | |
| 3 mo. MIRO Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.3095 | ||
| 3 mo. MIRO Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,28) = 0.009319 | ||
| 5G | 6 mo. DRP1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.2508 | |
| 6 mo. DRP1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.2508 | ||
| 6 mo. DRP1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.5342 | ||
| 5H | 6 mo. OPA1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.06358 | |
| 6 mo. OPA1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.06358 | ||
| 6 mo. OPA1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.2102 | ||
| 5I | 6 mo. FIS1 Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.1527 | |
| 6 mo. FIS1 Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.1527 | ||
| 6 mo. FIS1 Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 1.472 | ||
| 5 J | 6 mo. MIRO Interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.01677 | |
| 6 mo. MIRO Hemisphere | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.01677 | ||
| 6 mo. MIRO Treatment | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,32) = 0.1738 |
Fig. 2pS129 Immunofluorescence of PFF-injected mice. A Representative cortex, striatum, thalamus, hippocampus, and ventral midbrain images of pS129 α-synuclein positive aggregates in PFF-injected mice at 3 months p.i. B Representative cortex, striatum, thalamus, hippocampus, and ventral midbrain images of pS129 α-synuclein positive aggregates in PFF-injected mice at 6 months p.i. C Number of pS129 α-synuclein aggregates in each brain region measured using Nikon NIS elements software at 3 months (left). Multiple t-test comparison with FDR correction (Q set at 1%) revealed the number of pS129 α-synuclein aggregates was significantly higher in the ipsilateral hemisphere compared to contralateral hemisphere in the amygdala (p = 0.0003), thalamus (p = 0.0062), striatum (p = 0.0015), and insular cortex (p = 0.0046) across 3-5 sections from N = 3 PFF-injected mice. 6 months (right), pS129 quantification with Multiple t-tests with FDR correction (Q set at 1%) showed greater pS129 α-synuclein aggregates in the ipsilateral hemisphere compared to contralateral hemisphere in the amygdala (p = 0.0099), thalamus (p < 0.000001), striatum (p = 0.000002), and insular cortex (p = 0.000389). D The number of pS129 α-synuclein positive aggregates in each region was significantly decreased at 6 months compared to 3 months p.i. in the amygdala (ipsilateral p = 0.00365 and contralateral p = 0.019), as well as contralateral thalamus and insula cortex (p = 0.0378, 0.0170). E High resolution confocal imaging of pS129 α-synuclein positive inclusion morphology at 3 and 6 months p.i. in the cortex, striatum, thalamus, hippocampus, and ventral midbrain. F. pS129 α-synuclein positive inclusions were detected 6 months post intrastriatal monomer injections. Scale bars are 1000 µm for A, B, and F, and 150 µm for E
Presence of pS129-synuclein immunoreactive protein aggregates
| Basal Ganglia Nuclei | 3 months | 6 months |
|---|---|---|
| GPe | ND | ND |
| GPi | ND | ND |
| PFn | P | P |
| STN | ND | ND |
| SNr | P | P |
ND = Not detected, P = Present
Fig. 3PFF-induced loss of TH+ cells in SNc. A Representative TH DAB IHC of monomer and PFF-injected mouse 3-month p.i. B TH+ cells in the SNc were counted using unbiased stereology and revealed a significant decrease in the ipsilateral hemisphere of PFF-injected mice compared to ipsilateral monomer (Two-way ANOVA, main effect of PFF, F (1,36) = 6.667, p = 0.014; Monomer vs PFF: ipsilateral, Sidak’s multiple comparisons, p = 0.0451). C No change in TH+ cell counts when normalized as percent of contralateral hemisphere in monomer- and PFF-injected mice, respectively (Unpaired Student’s t-test, p = 0.0874, N = 11 monomer, 9 PFF). D Representative images TH DAB IHC of monomer and PFF injected mouse at 6 months p.i. E PFF-injected mice had a significant reduction in TH+ cells in the ipsilateral hemisphere compared to contralateral, no changes were detected in monomer (Two-way ANOVA, main effect of hemisphere F (1,42) = 26.765, p = 0.0128; contralateral vs. ipsilateral: PFF, Sidak’s multiple comparisons p = 0.0134, N = 12 monomer, 11 PFF). F When normalized as percent of contralateral hemisphere, PFF-injected mice showed significant decrease in TH+ cells compared to monomer-injected mice (Unpaired Student’s t-test, p = 0.0328). Scale bars are 200 µm
Fig. 4PFF-induced alteration of mitochondrial protein levels. A Representative western blot images of mitochondrial proteins VDAC1, COX-IV, Tomm-20, and Ndusf4 in homogenized cortex samples from monomer- and PFF-injected mice 3 months p.i. B Increased levels of VDAC1 in the contralateral compared to ipsilateral hemisphere of PFF-injected mice (Two-way ANOVA, main effect of PFF, F (1,28) = 6.355; ipsilateral vs contralateral: PFF, Sidak’s multiple comparison’s p = 0.0424; N = 8 monomer, 8 PFF) which was maintained when the contralateral hemispheres were compared between monomer- and PFF-injected mice (Monomer vs PFF: contralateral, Sidak’s multiple comparison’s p = 0.112). C COX-IV levels showed a main effect of PFF injection (Two-way ANOVA main PFF effect, F (1,28) = 7.425, p = 0.0110). No changes were detected in levels of Tomm-20 (D) or Ndusf4 (E) via Two-way ANOVA or multiple comparisons. F Representative western blot images of mitochondrial membrane proteins VDAC1, COX-IV, Tomm-20, and Ndusf4 in monomer- and PFF-injected mice 6 months p.i. G No change in VDAC1 levels. H COX-IV levels were increased in ipsilateral PFF-injected mice compared to monomer (Two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison’s p = 0.0299, N = 9 monomer, 9 PFF). No change detected in Tomm-20 (I) or Ndusf4 (J) levels. GAPDH was used as a loading/normalization control
Fig. 5Effect of PFF-seeded pathology on cortical levels of proteins involved in mitochondrial dynamics. A Representative western blot images of mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins DRP1, OPA1, FIS1, and MIRO1 in monomer- and PFF-injected mice 3 months p.i. B Main effect of PFF injection is observed in DRP1 levels (Two-way ANOVA, F(1,28) = 7.005, p = 0.0132, N = 8 monomer, 8 PFF). No changes were detected in levels of OPA1 (C), FIS1 (D), or MIRO1 (E). F Representative western blot images of mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins DRP1, OPA1, FIS1, and MIRO1 in monomer- and PFF-injected mice 6 months p.i. G–J No changes in were detected in cortical levels of mitochondrial proteins in monomer or PFF-injected mice 6 months p.i. (N = 9 monomer, 9 PFF). GAPDH was used as a loading/normalization control
Fig. 6Analysis of PFF-induced TH+ neuron loss correlation with cortical mitochondrial protein levels. A Comparison of the number of SNc TH+ neurons determined by stereology to the level of the mitochondrial protein VDAC1 of the ipsilateral (left) and contralateral (right) cortex at 3 months p.i. Simple linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation of TH+ neuron number and cortical VDAC1 levels in the contralateral hemisphere of PFF-injected mice. B, C No correlation was observed with COX-IV or DRP1 cortical protein levels and SNc TH+ cell number in either ipsilateral or contralateral hemisphere. D At 6-month p.i., while no significant correlation was observed between cortical COX-IV and SNc TH+ cell number, there was an apparent weak correlation in the contralateral hemisphere (right)
Fig. 7Altered striatal mitochondrial respiratory chain complex activity in PFF-injected mice. Activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and complex IV, as well as citrate synthase activity, measured at 3 months p.i. (A–C) and 6 months p.i. (D, E). No significant differences were found at 3 months p.i. (A–C). D At 6 months p.i., complex I activity was significantly increased in the contralateral hemisphere of PFF-injected animals compared to monomer (Two-way ANOVA, main effect of PFF, F (1,32) = 14.72, p = 0.0006; Monomer vs PFF: contralateral, Sidak’s multiple comparison’s test, p = 0.0018, N = 9 monomer, 9 PFF). E, F There were no significant differences in complex IV or citrate synthase activity at 6 months p.i