Literature DB >> 35606823

Cost-effectiveness of a smartphone Application for Tinnitus Treatment (the CATT trial): a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Annick Gilles1,2,3, Sarah Michiels4,1, Sara Demoen5,6,7, Laure Jacquemin1,2, Annick Timmermans4, Vincent Van Rompaey1,2, Olivier Vanderveken1,2, Hanne Vermeersch1, Iris Joossen1, Julie Van Eetvelde4,1, Winfried Schlee8, Wim Marneffe9, Janis Luyten9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a highly prevalent symptom, affecting 10-15% of the adult population. Tinnitus influenced by alterations in somatosensory afference from the neck or jaw is referred to as somatic tinnitus (ST). ST is known to respond positively to physiotherapy treatment; however, it is challenging to motivate patients to systematically perform home exercises correctly, and the necessary tinnitus counselling is often lacking. The aim of this study is twofold, namely to investigate both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a blended physiotherapy program for ST, including a smartphone application designed to increase exercise therapy compliance and provide tinnitus counselling.
METHODS: This study is designed as a single-blind two-arm 1:1 randomised controlled trial (RCT). Adult patients diagnosed with ST, without psychiatric comorbidities and with experience in using a smartphone, will be recruited at the Ear Nose Throat (ENT) department of the Antwerp University Hospital (UZA). Patients will be randomised into two groups. The experimental group will receive the blended physiotherapy program comprising six in-clinic physiotherapy sessions over a period of 12 weeks (1x/2 weeks) and an exercise and counselling program provided by the smartphone application. The control group will receive the standard care program comprising twelve weekly in-clinic physiotherapy sessions. Each physiotherapy session has a duration of 30 min. The primary outcome measure is the change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) score. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective considering both direct and indirect costs. There will be follow-up assessments at one and 3 months after the final treatment session. DISCUSSION: Our study is the first to combine both tinnitus counselling and neck/jaw treatment provided by a digital application in a blended physiotherapy program. This, in order to empower ST patients to improve and better manage their own health and, possibly, reduce economic costs by alleviating the tinnitus burden that ST patients experience. The strengths of the planned RCT are the high-quality methodological design, the large sample size and the expertise of the involved multidisciplinary research team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05245318 . Registered on 26 January 2022.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blended physiotherapy; Randomised controlled trial; Smartphone application; Somatic tinnitus; Telerehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606823      PMCID: PMC9125968          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06378-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.728


  73 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive-behavioral treatments for tinnitus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rilana F F Cima; Gerhard Andersson; Caroline J Schmidt; James A Henry
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Does multi-modal cervical physical therapy improve tinnitus in patients with cervicogenic somatic tinnitus?

Authors:  S Michiels; P Van de Heyning; S Truijen; A Hallemans; W De Hertogh
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2016-08-26

3.  Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rilana F F Cima; Iris H Maes; Manuela A Joore; Dyon J W M Scheyen; Amr El Refaie; David M Baguley; Lucien J C Anteunis; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cervical spine dysfunctions in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah Michiels; Willem De Hertogh; Steven Truijen; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Prognostic Indicators for Positive Treatment Outcome After Multidisciplinary Orofacial Treatment in Patients With Somatosensory Tinnitus.

Authors:  Annemarie van der Wal; Paul Van de Heyning; Annick Gilles; Laure Jacquemin; Vedat Topsakal; Vincent Van Rompaey; Marc Braem; Corine Mirjam Visscher; Steven Truijen; Sarah Michiels; Willem De Hertogh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Tinnitus retraining therapy.

Authors:  P J Jastreboff
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Neck muscle training in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a three-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J Ylinen; A Häkkinen; M Nykänen; H Kautiainen; E-P Takala
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2007-05-28

8.  Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Timothy J Madson; Kathryn R Cieslak
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Smartphone-Guided Educational Counseling and Self-Help for Chronic Tinnitus.

Authors:  Winfried Schlee; Patrick Neff; Jorge Simoes; Berthold Langguth; Stefan Schoisswohl; Heidi Steinberger; Marie Norman; Myra Spiliopoulou; Johannes Schobel; Ronny Hannemann; Rüdiger Pryss
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  The Effect of Physical Therapy Treatment in Patients with Subjective Tinnitus: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarah Michiels; Sebastiaan Naessens; Paul Van de Heyning; Marc Braem; Corine M Visscher; Annick Gilles; Willem De Hertogh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.