Literature DB >> 35606563

Association Between Intensive Care Unit Admission Practices and Outcomes in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Nationwide Inpatient Database Analysis in Japan.

Keita Shibahashi1,2, Hiroyuki Ohbe3, Hideo Yasunaga3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with traumatic brain injury associated with intracranial hemorrhage are commonly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU); however, the need for ICU care for patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between the ICU admission practices and outcomes in patients with isolated tSAH.
METHODS: This observational study used a nationwide administrative database in Japan. We identified patients with isolated tSAH from the Japanese Diagnostic Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, whereas the secondary outcomes were neurosurgical interventions, activities of daily living at discharge, and total hospitalization cost. We performed a risk-adjusted mixed-effect regression analysis to evaluate the association between hospital-level ICU admission rates and study outcomes. The ICU admission rates were categorized into quartiles: lowest, middle-low, middle-high, and highest. Moreover, we assessed the robustness of the results with a patient-level instrumental variable analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 61,883 patients with isolated tSAH treated at 962 hospitals, 16,898 (27.3%) patients were admitted to the ICU on the day of admission. Overall, 2465 (4.0%) patients died in the hospital, and 783 (1.3%) patients underwent neurosurgical interventions. There was no significant difference between the lowest and highest ICU admission quartile in terms of in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs. 4.3%; adjusted odds ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.10), neurosurgical interventions, and activities of daily living at discharge. However, the total hospitalization cost in the lowest ICU admission quartile was significantly lower than that in the highest quartile (US $3032 vs. $4095; adjusted difference US $560; 95% CI 33-1087). The patient-level instrumental variable analysis did not reveal a significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the patients who were admitted to the ICU and those who were not (risk difference 0.2%; 95% CI - 0.1 to 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between the ICU admission practices and outcomes in patients with isolated tSAH, whereas higher ICU admission rates were associated with significantly higher hospitalization costs. Our results provide an opportunity for improved health care allocation in the management of patients with isolated tSAH.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health service research; Intensive care unit; Traumatic brain injury; Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606563     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01522-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.532


  22 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jonathan J Lee; David J Segar; Wael F Asaad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Does isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage merit a lower intensity level of observation than other traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Herb A Phelan; Adam A Richter; William W Scott; Jeffrey H Pruitt; Christopher J Madden; Kim L Rickert; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Evaluation of Critical Care Unit Admission Practices and Outcomes From a North American Perspective.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; James P Byrne; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Avery B Nathens; Leodante B da Costa
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  The clinical significance of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Benjamin Davidson; Saleh A Almenawer; Nir Lipsman; Leodante Da Costa; Farhad Pirouzmand; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Are routine repeat imaging and intensive care unit admission necessary in mild traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Chad W Washington; Robert L Grubb
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  F Servadei; G Teasdale; G Merry
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary.

Authors:  George C Velmahos; Alice Gervasini; Laurie Petrovick; David J Dorer; Mary E Doran; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Hasan B Alam; Marc De Moya; Lawrence F Borges; Alasdair K Conn
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-03

8.  Necessity of repeat head CT and ICU monitoring in patients with minimal brain injury.

Authors:  Tiffany K Bee; Louis J Magnotti; Martin A Croce; George O Maish; Gayle Minard; Thomas J Schroeppel; Ben L Zarzaur; Timothy C Fabian
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-04

9.  The clinical significance of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Matthew R Quigley; Brandon G Chew; Christopher E Swartz; Jack E Wilberger
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update.

Authors:  Johan Undén; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Bertil Romner
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.