| Literature DB >> 35606553 |
Yun Dai1,2, Ya-Hui Wang1,2, Min Li1,2, Mei-Ling Zhu1,2, Tong-Yue Wen1,2, Xiao-Qin Wu3,4.
Abstract
A previous study found that a biocontrol bacterium, Bacillus pumilus HR10, inhibited the Sphaeropsis shoot blight disease of pine, and the fermentation broth of HR10 strain contained protein antifungal substances. The optimal formulation of the fermentation medium for the antagonistic substance of B. pumilus HR10 was finally obtained by single-factor test, Packett-Burman test, steepest ascent test and Box-Behnken Design (BBD) response surface test, and the best formulation of the fermentation medium for the antagonistic substance of B. pumilus HR10 was 12 g/L corn meal, 15 g/L beef extract and 13 g/L magnesium sulfate, with a predicted bacterial inhibition rate of 89%. The fermentation filtrate of B. pumilus HR10 cultured with the optimized medium formulation was verified to have an inhibition rate of (87.04 ± 3.2) % on the growth of Sphaeropsis sapinea by three replicate tests. The antagonistic crude protein of B. pumilus HR10 were further isolated and identified using HiTrap Capto Q strong Ion-Exchange Chromatography and LC-MS-MS, and it was speculated that glycoside hydrolase (Ghy), beta-glucanase (Beta), arabinogalactan endonuclease β-1,4-galactanase (Arab), and immunosuppressant A (ImA) are proteins with antagonistic activity against S. sapinea in the B. pumilus HR10.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonistic protein; Bacillus pumilus HR10; Optimization of fermentation medium; Sphaeropsis shoot blight disease of pine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35606553 PMCID: PMC9127024 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01401-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 4.126
Experimental matrix and response values from randomized runs in the Packett-Burman test
| Run | Code variable level | Real variable level (g/L) | Inhibition rate (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | Yeast extract | corn flour | beef extract | peptone | MgSO4 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 86.30 |
| 2 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 77.50 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 85.20 |
| 4 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 85.60 |
| 5 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 80.50 |
| 6 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 76.60 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 81.60 |
| 8 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 81.20 |
| 9 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 78.90 |
| 10 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 74.50 |
| 11 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 79.80 |
| 12 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 77.20 |
Fig. 1Single-factor test for screening fermentation media of Bacillus pumilus HR10 with different basal media (A), carbon sources (B), nitrogen sources (C) and inorganic salts (D)
The importance of each factor for medium optimization
| Factors | Coefficient | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Yeast extract (g/L) | 1.642 | 4.35 | 0.005 | 2 |
| B: Corn flour (g/L) | 2.492 | 6.60 | 0.001 | 1 |
| C: Beef extract (g/L) | 1.358 | 3.60 | 0.011 | 3 |
| D: Peptone (g/L) | − 0.142 | − 0.38 | 0.720 | 5 |
| E: MgSO4 (g/L) | 1.225 | 3.25 | 0.018 | 4 |
Experimental design and response of the steepest ascent test
| Run | Corn flour (g/L) | Beef extract (g/L) | MgSO4 (g/L) | Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 67.80 |
| 2 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 73.40 |
| 3 | 9 | 14 | 12 | 76.80 |
| 4 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 82.00 |
| 5 | 13 | 18 | 14 | 77.00 |
| 6 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 65.00 |
| 7 | 17 | 22 | 16 | 66.50 |
Experimental matrix and response values from randomized runs in the Box–Behnken design
| Run | Code variable level | Real variable level (g/L) | Inhibition rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | C | E | Corn flour | Beef extract | MgSO4 | ||
| 1 | − 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 13 | 79.8 |
| 2 | 0 | − 1 | − 1 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 80.9 |
| 3 | − 1 | 0 | − 1 | 9 | 16 | 12 | 74.6 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | − 1 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 86.7 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 97.4 |
| 6 | 1 | − 1 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 86.7 |
| 7 | 0 | − 1 | 1 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 83.8 |
| 8 | − 1 | − 1 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 13 | 82.7 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 18 | 13 | 79.3 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 88.3 |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | − 1 | 11 | 18 | 12 | 83.7 |
| 12 | − 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 14 | 78.2 |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 16 | 14 | 74.8 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 87.9 |
| 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 18 | 14 | 71.5 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 88.7 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 87.2 |
Analysis of variance and lack-of-fit tests for the response surface models
| Source | Explained sum of squares | DF | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 461.94 | 9 | 51.33 | 70.10 | < 0.0001 |
| B: Corn flour | 18.61 | 1 | 18.61 | 25.41 | 0.0015 |
| C: Beef extract | 49.00 | 1 | 49.00 | 66.93 | < 0.0001 |
| E: MgSO4 | 38.72 | 1 | 38.72 | 52.89 | 0.0002 |
| B × C | 5.06 | 1 | 5.06 | 6.91 | 0.0339 |
| B × E | 60.06 | 1 | 60.06 | 82.04 | < 0.0001 |
| C × E | 57.00 | 1 | 57.00 | 77.86 | < 0.0001 |
| B2 | 54.19 | 1 | 54.19 | 74.02 | < 0.0001 |
| C2 | 20.15 | 1 | 20.15 | 27.52 | 0.0012 |
| E2 | 138.61 | 1 | 138.61 | 189.32 | < 0.0001 |
| Residual error Residual | 5.12 | 7 | 0.7321 | ||
| Lack of fit | 3.58 | 3 | 1.19 | 3.10 | 0.1512 |
| Pure error | 1.54 | 4 | 0.3850 | ||
| Cor total | 467.06 | 16 |
R2 = 0.9890, Adj R2 = 0.9749, Predicted R2 = 0.8720
Fig. 2Response surface plots of the effect of various factors on the inhibition rate of S. sapinea growth by fermented filtrate of B. pumilus HR10 and validation of the optimal formulation. A The response surface and contour plots for the effects of corn flour and beef extract on inhibition rate at middle level of MgSO4 contents; B The response surface and contour plots for the effects of corn flour and MgSO4 on inhibition rate at middle level of beef extract contents; C The response surface and contour plots for the effects of beef extract and MgSO4 on inhibition rate at middle level of corn flour contents; D Validation of the optimal formulation for the inhibition rate of S. sapinea growth by fermented filtrate of B. pumilus HR10
Fig. 3Isolation of antagonistic protein in the fermentation broth of B. pumilus HR10. A Elution curve of crude protein in B. pumilus HR10 fermentation broth by strong Ion-Exchange Chromatography; B The antagonistic activity of each elution peak; C The SDS-PEGE stained graph of elution peak III
The purification efficiency of antagonistic protein from B. pumilus HR10
| Purification of samples | Total protein (mg) | Total enzyme activity (U) | Specific enzyme activity (U/mg) | Purification fold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermentation filtrate | 38.6 | 1756 | 45.5 | 1.0 |
| Crude protein | 25.8 | 1455 | 56.4 | 1.2 |
| Peak III | 2.4 | 680 | 283.3 | 5.0 |
The peptide fragments antagonistic protein of B. pumilus HR10 obtained by LC–MS-MS
| Protein ID | Name | Match fragment | Protein mass (Da) | Score | GO function | Source strain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tr|W6AP62|W6AP62_9BACI | Glycoside hydrolase (Ghy) | GGLKPSSPTGASDWEK;VAELYYIFAK;YQSSFNEATGK | 78,642.23 | 91.16 | Cellulase activity | |
| tr|A0A0H1RZ89|A0A0H1RZ89_BACPU | Beta -glucanase (Beta) | LSLTSPSYNK;SVQTYGYGLYEVNMKPAK;VQFNYYTNGVGNHEK | 27,282.05 | 92.62 | Hydrolase activity | Bacillus |
| tr|A0A2G8IU99|A0A2G8IU99_BACPU | Immunosuppressant A (ImA) | AWYDIEEDYDYAYVEVR;DPNIDLGEYDQWDR;DVPTYGLSFK;HPGNGFLGVVDADQQVLK;NEAGANEGNGIDGK;NYVNPNNPDAGR;VLVLLVDFK;VPGTEPTGFSPYAK;VWSDDAEGTSTFTFNGFSQSNGK;WSDGSIAATGFQVHDAAFSLNPSTK | 87,240.05 | 88.41 | Metallopeptidase activity | |
| tr|A0A5D4QPP2|A0A5D4QPP2_BACPU | Arabinogalactan endo-β-1,4 -galactanase (Arab) | ALPSLDVFK;AYNGGTNDLNTAIALSK | 44,550.25 | 88.52 | Glucosidase activity |