Literature DB >> 35606478

Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer.

Mary Hwang1, Sarah Medley2, Faisal Shakeel1, Brett Vanderwerff3, Matthew Zawistowski3, Kelley M Kidwell2, Daniel L Hertz4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment.
METHODS: Genome-wide genetic data was collected from an institutional genetic data repository for CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, GSTA1, GSTP1, ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1, ABCC1, ABCB1, and ERCC1. Treatment and toxicity data were retrospectively collected from the patient's medical record. The a priori selected primary hypothesis was that patients who have CYP2B6 reduced metabolizer activity (poor or intermediate (PM/IM) vs. normal (NM) metabolizer) have lower risk of severe toxicity or cyclophosphamide treatment modification due to toxicity.
RESULTS: In the primary analysis of 510 cyclophosphamide-treated patients with available genetic data, there was no difference in the odds of severe toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity in CYP2B6 PM/IM vs. NM (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62-1.50, p = 0.88). In an exploratory, statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, carriers of the ALDH1A1 rs8187996 variant had a lower risk of the primary toxicity endpoint compared with wild-type homozygous patients (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.09-0.78, p = 0.028). None of the other tested phenotypes or genotypes was associated with the primary or secondary endpoints in unadjusted analysis (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The finding that patients who carry ALDH1A1 rs8187996 may have a lower risk of cyclophosphamide toxicity than wild-type patients contradicts a prior finding for this variant and should be viewed with skepticism. We found weak evidence that any of these candidate pharmacogenetic predictors of cyclophosphamide toxicity may be useful to personalize cyclophosphamide dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALDH1A1; CYP2B6; Cyclophosphamide; Pharmacogenetic; Toxicity; Treatment discontinuation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606478     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.359


  21 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics of drug-metabolizing enzymes: the prodrug hypothesis.

Authors:  Evan J Begg; Nuala A Helsby; Berit P Jensen
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  The combined impact of CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics on cyclophosphamide bioactivation.

Authors:  Nuala A Helsby; Chung-Yee Hui; Michael A Goldthorpe; Janet K Coller; May Ching Soh; Peter J Gow; Janak Z De Zoysa; Malcolm D Tingle
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Gene polymorphisms in cyclophosphamide metabolism pathway,treatment-related toxicity, and disease-free survival in SWOG 8897 clinical trial for breast cancer.

Authors:  Song Yao; William E Barlow; Kathy S Albain; Ji-Yeob Choi; Hua Zhao; Robert B Livingston; Warren Davis; James M Rae; I-Tien Yeh; Laura F Hutchins; Peter M Ravdin; Silvana Martino; Alan P Lyss; C Kent Osborne; Martin Abeloff; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Daniel F Hayes; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Relationship between ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer treated with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Authors:  Midori Ikeda; Daiki Tsuji; Keisuke Yamamoto; Yong-Il Kim; Takashi Daimon; Yutaro Iwabe; Masahiro Hatori; Ryo Makuta; Hideki Hayashi; Kazuyuki Inoue; Hidenori Nakamichi; Mitsuru Shiokawa; Kunihiko Itoh
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.614

Review 5.  Aldehyde dehydrogenase-mediated cellular relative insensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines.

Authors:  N E Sládek
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Influence of polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes (CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTA1, GSTP1, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Corine Ekhart; Valerie D Doodeman; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Paul H M Smits; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Genetic markers in CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 for prediction of cyclophosphamide's 4-hydroxylation, efficacy and side effects in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Wenying Shu; Su Guan; Xiuyan Yang; Liuqin Liang; Jiali Li; Zhuojia Chen; Yu Zhang; Lingyan Chen; Xueding Wang; Min Huang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Involvement of human glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the conjugation of cyclophosphamide metabolites with glutathione.

Authors:  H A Dirven; B van Ommen; P J van Bladeren
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Germline genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCC1 and ALDH1A1, and risk of hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities in a SWOG Phase III trial S0221 for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Yao; L E Sucheston; H Zhao; W E Barlow; G Zirpoli; S Liu; H C F Moore; G Thomas Budd; D L Hershman; W Davis; G L Ciupak; J A Stewart; C Isaacs; T J Hobday; M Salim; G N Hortobagyi; J R Gralow; R B Livingston; K S Albain; D F Hayes; C B Ambrosone
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Cyclophosphamide bioactivation pharmacogenetics in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nuala Helsby; Minghan Yong; Kathryn Burns; Michael Findlay; David Porter
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.