| Literature DB >> 35604666 |
Yoav Glidai1, Katie A Lucy1, Joel S Schuman1,2,3, Palaiologos Alexopoulos1, Bo Wang4, Mengfei Wu1,5, Mengling Liu1,5, Jonathan P Vande Geest4,6,7, Hirut G Kollech8, TingFang Lee1,5, Hiroshi Ishikawa1, Gadi Wollstein1,3.
Abstract
Purpose: The lamina cribrosa (LC) is a leading target for initial glaucomatous damage. We investigated the in vivo microstructural deformation within the LC volume in response to acute IOP modulation while maintaining fixed intracranial pressure (ICP).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35604666 PMCID: PMC9150833 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.5.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.925
Baseline Characteristics of Eyes Included in This Study
| Lamina Cribrosa Parameters | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye | NHP No. | OD/OS | Sex | Age | Disc Area, µm2 | Disc Aspect Ratio | Beam Thickness, µm | Pore Diameter, µm | BPR | CTVF, % | Mean Pore Area, µm2 | Pore Aspect Ratio |
| A | 11 | OD | M | 8.7 | 2.71 | 1.38 | 39.59 (2.55) | 26.72 (2.01) | 1.49 (0.09) | 0.70 (0.01) | 1067.94 (160.14) | 1.82 (0.11) |
| B | 2 | OD | F | 14.4 | 2.35 | 1.27 | 36.19 (0.97) | 20.05 (1.07) | 1.81 (0.09) | 0.76 (0.02) | 544.43 (70.51) | 1.79 (0.17) |
| C | 8 | OD | M | 9.7 | 2.67 | 1.33 | 43.87 (1.93) | 22.10 (1.43) | 1.99 (0.11) | 0.79 (0.01) | 669.73 (88.47) | 1.88 (0.19) |
| D | 5 | OD | M | 8.7 | 3.83 | 1.35 | 55.68 (2.75) | 25.51 (2.44) | 2.20 (0.18) | 0.81 (0.02) | 978.04 (188.46) | 1.76 (0.06) |
| E | 10 | OD | M | 11.2 | 2.34 | 1.37 | 42.03 (2.60) | 24.73 (1.51) | 1.70 (0.08) | 0.74 (0.01) | 843.87 (173.77) | 1.91 (0.16) |
| F | 6 | OD | M | 7.9 | 3.05 | 1.31 | 43.39 (4.54) | 32.11 (2.79) | 1.35 (0.06) | 0.64 (0.01) | 2152.23 (436.92) | 2.00 (0.15) |
| G | 1 | OS | F | 11.9 | 2.43 | 1.32 | 30.86 (1.64) | 21.34 (0.91) | 1.45 (0.05) | 0.67 (0.01) | 847.40 (136.64) | 1.97 (0.14) |
| H | 6 | OS | M | 7.9 | 3.05 | 1.32 | 43.35 (1.92) | 32.28 (1.93) | 1.35 (0.11) | 0.66 (0.02) | 1756.44 (357.03) | 1.83 (0.11) |
| All eyes (SD) | 10.05 (2.29) | 2.80 (0.50) | 1.33 (0.04) | 41.87 (7.15) | 25.61 (4.63) | 1.67 (0.31) | 0.72 (0.06) | 1107.51 (557.64) | 1.87 (0.09) | |||
| BPR deformers (SD) | 10.38 (2.72) | 2.89 (0.65) | 1.33 (0.05) | 44.49 (8.08) | 23.69 (3.23) | 1.89 (0.29) | 0.77 (0.04) | 823.73 (255.53) | 1.80 (0.15) | |||
| BPR non-deformers (SD) | 9.72 (2.13) | 2.70 (0.37) | 1.33 (0.03) | 40.40 (5.84) | 28.05 (5.05) | 1.46 (0.16) | 0.68 (0.04) | 1460.96 (664.49) | 1.93 (0.16) | |||
| BPR deformers vs. non-deformers, | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.03* | 0.15 | 0.04* | |||
“BPR deformers” group are eyes that displayed a BPR change in response to IOP elevation (A–D), whereas “BPR non-deformers” include eyes that did not (E–H). Results are reported as mean (SD).
NHP, non-human primate; BPR, beam-to-pore ratio; CTVF, connective tissue volume fraction.
Figure 1.Anterior-to-posterior, lamina cribrosa beam-to-pore ratio (BPR) in response to acute IOP elevation in the presence of fixed intracranial pressure. The horizontal axis represents depth in microns. Points of maximum change (either positive or negative) from the anterior surface are marked with dashed circles and colored accordingly to the pressure setting. Eyes A to D exhibited substantial BPR deformation, whereas eyes E to H showed minimal change all through lamina depth. Marked variability is noted among eyes in response magnitude and location.
Figure 2.Anterior-to-posterior changes in beam thickness (continuous lines) and pore diameter (dashed lines) in all eyes in response to acute IOP elevation in the presence of fixed intracranial pressure. Both horizontal (depth) and vertical (thickness and diameter) axis units are in micrometers. Eyes are named in the same order, as reported in Figure 1 and Table 1.
Association Between Difference in Beam-To-Pore Ratio (Δ BPR) and Strain Values and Strain Range Between Pressure Settings (N-IOP Against H1-IOP and H1-IOP Against H2-IOP) Calculated Using Mixed Effects Model Adjusted for Age
| N-IOP Versus H1-IOP | H1-IOP Versus H2-IOP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔBPR Versus Strain Values | ΔBPR Versus Strain Range | ΔBPR Versus Strain Values | ΔBPR Versus Strain Range | |
| All eyes |
|
|
|
|
| BPR deformers |
|
|
|
|
| BPR non-deformers |
|
|
|
|
Statistically significant.