Literature DB >> 35604476

Totally laparoscopic resection of right-sided colon cancer using transvaginal specimen extraction with a 10-mm-long abdominal incision.

A Nishimura1, M Kawahara2, Y Kawachi2, J Hasegawa2, S Makino2, C Kitami2, T Nakano2, T Otani2, M Nemoto2, S Hattori2, K Nikkuni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has been developed as a means of decreasing the incidence of surgical wound complications. We refined the procedure for totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction using the reduced port surgery technique with the ultimate goal of attenuating damage to the abdominal wall. We herein report this innovative technique and its short- and long-term outcomes.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data on seven patients who underwent totally laparoscopic colectomy using transvaginal specimen extraction with a 10-mm-long abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer from January 2014 to December 2021. Two 5-mm ports were used in the procedure without laparotomy. Transverse transabdominal posterior colpotomy was then performed. We introduced a GelPOINT Mini advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) into the transvaginal route for the insertion of a laparoscope, forceps, and stapling device. Lymph node dissection and transection of the ileum and distal colon were performed with transvaginal assistance. A specimen was then extracted transvaginally. Intracorporeal functional end-to-end anastomosis was conducted using a linear stapler through the vagina. After the removal of GelPOINT Mini, the vaginal incision was closed transvaginally.
RESULTS: Seven patients successfully underwent this procedure. Median operative time was 219 min (range 174-255 min), median blood loss was 23 ml (range 10-37 ml), median number of harvested lymph nodes was 21 (range 17-35 lymph nodes) and median margins were 17.0 cm (range 9.0-25.0 cm) for the proximal margin and 9.5 cm (range 5.0-13.0 cm) for the distal margin. There were no complications more severe than Clavien-Dindo Grade II and there was no mortality. The median frequency of use intravenous analgesics from postoperative day 1 to discharge was once. Two patients did not require analgesics. A node-positive patient developed recurrence at the lung and paraaortic lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: This procedure appears to be feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable for selected cases.
© 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic colectomy; Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE); Reduced port surgery (RPS); Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE)

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35604476     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02636-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.699


  9 in total

1.  Natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  J S Park; G-S Choi; H J Kim; S Y Park; S H Jun
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of hybrid natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D C Steinemann; P C Müller; P Probst; A-C Schwarz; M W Büchler; B P Müller-Stich; G R Linke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Francesco Stipa; Antonio Burza; Rosanna Curinga; Ettore Santini; Pietro Delle Site; Riccardo Avantifiori; Marcello Picchio
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Laparoscopic high anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for early rectal cancer.

Authors:  B S Ooi; H M Quah; C W P Fu; K W Eu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Ghezzi; L Raio; M D Mueller; T Gyr; M Buttarelli; M Franchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  J Watanabe; M Ota; S Fujii; H Suwa; A Ishibe; I Endo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prospective multicenter study of reduced port surgery combined with transvaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Atsushi Hamabe; Tsuyoshi Hata; Yuji Nishizawa; Atsushi Nishimura; Masaaki Itoh; Ichiro Takemasa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Léon Maggiori; Jean Jacques Tuech; Eddy Cotte; Bernard Lelong; Quentin Denost; Mehdi Karoui; Eric Vicaut; Yves Panis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Totally laparoscopic anterior resection with transvaginal assistance and transvaginal specimen extraction: a technique for natural orifice surgery combined with reduced-port surgery.

Authors:  Atsushi Nishimura; Mikako Kawahara; Keisuke Honda; Takahiro Ootani; Tomoyuki Kakuta; Chie Kitami; Shigeto Makino; Yasuyuki Kawachi; Keiya Nikkuni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.