Literature DB >> 35604456

Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination.

Ruipei Xiao1, Juedong Hou2, Yang Zhou1, Jintao Zheng1, Xiaobao Zou3, Yongjian Zhu2, Ling Yao2, Xiangyang Ma4, Jianting Chen5, Jincheng Yang6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and describe the morphologic features of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination (BI) for informing the placement of pedicle screws. C2 pedicle screw placement is an important surgical technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability in patients with BI. However, no systematic and comprehensive anatomical study of the C2 pedicle in patients with BI has been reported.
METHODS: The data from 100 patients diagnosed with BI (BI group) and 100 patients without head or cervical disease (control group) were included in the study. Radiographic parameters, including the pedicle width, length, height, transverse angle, lamina angle, and superior angle, were measured and analyzed on CT images. After summary analysis, the effect of C2-3 congenital fusion on C2 pedicle deformity in patients with BI was also investigated.
RESULTS: The width, length, and height of the C2 pedicle of the BI patients were smaller than those of the control group. The pedicle cancellous bone was smaller in the BI group, while no significant difference in cortical bone was observed. In total, 44% of the pedicles were smaller than 4.5 mm in the BI group. Patients with C2-3 congenital fusion presented with smaller pedicle transverse angles and larger pedicle superior angles than those without fusion. Wide variations in the left and right angles of the pedicle were observed in the BI group with atlantoaxial dislocation or atlantooccipital fusion.
CONCLUSION: The C2 pedicle in the BI group was thinner than that in the control group due to a smaller cortical bone. Cases of C2-3 congenital fusion, atlantoaxial dislocation, and atlantooccipital fusion displayed variation in the angle of the C2 pedicle.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Basilar invagination; C2 pedicle; Computed tomography; Malformation; Pedicle screws

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35604456     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07258-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  19 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle.

Authors:  J U Howington; J J Kruse; D Awasthi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Radiological Evaluation of Craniocervical Region in Patients with Basilar Invagination.

Authors:  Wei Ji; Xiaolin Xu; Zenghui Wu; Xiang Liu; Ganggang Kong; Zucheng Huang; Jianting Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Basilar invagination.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Mark F Abel; Arnold H Menezes
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles.

Authors:  E E Karaikovic; M D Daubs; R W Madsen; R W Gaines
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Basilar Impression (Platybasia): A Bizarre Developmental Anomaly of the Occipital Bone and Upper Cervical Spine with Striking and Misleading Neurologic Manifestations.

Authors:  W E Chamberlain
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1939-05

6.  The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy.

Authors:  Xian-zhong Meng; Jia-xin Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is Basilar Invagination Related with Stenosis of the Hypoglossal Nerve Canal?

Authors:  Beatriz B Vasconcelos; José J C Nascimento; Marcelo M Valença; Eulâmpio J Silva-Neto; Paula R B Diniz; Severino A Araújo-Neto
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  [Are C2 pedicles always screwable? Calibration and planning with a pedicle-lamina angle].

Authors:  S Le Pape; R Gauthe; C Latrobe; P Cantogrel; F Proust; J Leroux; M Ould-Slimane
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery.

Authors:  Atul Goel; Bhavin Jankharia; Abhidha Shah; Prashant Sathe
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.