| Literature DB >> 35602337 |
Vipin Dhote1, Avinash Singh Mandloi1, Pradeep Kumar Singour1, Manisha Kawadkar1, Aditya Ganeshpurkar2, Manoj P Jadhav3.
Abstract
Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury induces multi-dimensional damage to neuronal cells through exacerbation of critical protective mechanisms. Targeting more than one mechanism simultaneously namely, inflammatory responses and metabolic energy homeostasis could provide additional benefits to restrict or manage cerebral injury. Being proven neuroprotective agents both, progesterone (PG) and trimetazidine (TMZ) has the potential to add on the individual therapeutic outcomes. We hypothesized the simultaneous administration of PG and TMZ could complement each other to synergize, or at least enhance neuroprotection in reperfusion injury. We investigated the combination of PG and TMZ on middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) induced cerebral reperfusion injury in rats. Molecular docking on targets of energy homeostasis and apoptosis assessed the initial viability of PG and TMZ for neuroprotection. Animal experimentation with MCA induced ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats was performed on five randomized groups. Sham operated control group received vehicle (saline) while the other four I-R groups were pre-treated with vehicle (saline), PG (8 mg/kg), TMZ treated (25 mg/kg), and PG + TMZ (8 and 25 mg/kg) for 7 days by intraperitoneal route. Neurological deficit, infarct volume, and oxidative stress were evaluated to assess the extent of injury in rats. Inflammatory reactivity and apoptotic activity were determined with alterations in myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and DNA fragments. Reperfusion injury inflicted cerebral infarct, neurological deficit, and shattered BBB integrity. The combination treatment of PG and TMZ restricted cellular damage indicated by significant (p < 0.05) decrease in infarct volume and improvement in free radical scavenging ability (SOD activity and GSH level). MPO activity and LPO decreased which contributed in improved BBB integrity in treated rats. We speculate that inhibition of inflammatory and optimum energy utilization would critically contribute to observed neuroprotection with combined PG and TMZ treatment. Further exploration of this neuroprotective approach for post-recovery cognitive improvement is worth investigating.Entities:
Keywords: 3-KAT, 3-Ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase; AQP4, Aquaporin; Apaf-1, Apoptotic protease activating factor-1; Apoptosis; BBB, Blood brain barrier; CAT, Catalase; DTNB, 5-,5-dithiobis 2-nitrobenzoic acid; FFA, Free fatty acid; GSH, Reduced glutahione; I/R, Ischemia-reperfusion; IL-1β, Interleukin 1beta; Ischemia-reperfusion; MCAO, Middle cerebral artery occlusion; MDA, Malondialdehyde; MPO, Myeloperoxidase; Metabolic energy; Molecular docking; Myeloperoxidase; Oxidative stress; PG, Progesterone; ROCK, Rho/Rho-kinase; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; TBA, Thiobarbituric acid; TCA, Trichloroacetic acid; TMZ, Trimetazidine; TNFα, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TTC, 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride; mptp, Mitochondrial pore permeability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35602337 PMCID: PMC9118508 DOI: 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov ISSN: 2590-2571
Docking interactions of PG and TMZ with various targets.
| Target | PDB ID | Resolution | Binding Energy (Kcal/mol) | Grid Box | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | TMZ | Dimensions | Coordinates | |||||
| X | Y | Z | ||||||
| β-ketothiolase | 4NZS | 2.29 A | −6.5 | −5.7 | 76∗76∗76 | −20.43 | 20.53 | −28.46 |
| Enoyl reductase | 2NV6 | 1.90 A | −8.3 | −5.8 | 56∗56∗56 | −3.48 | 37.03 | 15.08 |
| Apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 | 3YGS | 2.05 A | −6.3 | −4.6 | 50∗50∗50 | 61.96 | 29.24 | 62.99 |
| Rho-Kinase | 2H9V | 3.10 A | −9.1 | −5.8 | 76∗76∗76 | 9.70 | −17.55 | −23.96 |
Table legend text: Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg) trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg).
Fig. 1Docking details of Progesterone [(a) 2D-interactions (b) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] and Trimetazidine [(c) 2D-interactions (d) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] against β-ketothiolase.
Fig. 2Docking details of Progesterone [(a) 2D-interactions (b) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] and Trimetazidine [(c) 2D-interactions (d) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] against Enoyl reductase.
Fig. 3Docking details of Progesterone [(a) 2D-interactions (b) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] and trimetazidine [(c) 2D-interactions (d) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] against Apoptotic Protease-activating factor 1.
Fig. 4Docking details of progesterone [(a) 2D-interactions (b) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] and trimetazidine [(c) 2D-interactions (d) 3D-interactions (H-bonding surface)] against rho kinase.
Neurological deficit.
| Treatment | Neurological Score | Interquartile Range | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25% Percentile | 75% Percentile | ||
| I/R | 3.5 | 3.00 | 4.00 |
| PG | 2.5 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| TMZ | 2.5 | 1.75 | 3.25 |
| PG + TMZ | 2.5 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
Table legend text: Neurological deficit was assessed after 22 h of reperfusion. The values represented as median of scores and respective interquartile range; n = 6. Ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R); Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg) trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg) group, compared with I/R; P < 0.05.
Fig. 5Infract area in brain slice after I/R injury:
Unstained (white colour) region indicates infarction which is marked by arrow displaying infarction in the brain and stained (red colour) indicates uninfarcted region in the brain. The slices represent, A: Sham operated rat with no or very small infarct area; B: I/R control rat with large infracted tissue area; C: Progesterone treated rat with slight reduction in infarct area; D: Trimetazidine treated I/R rat showed reduced cellular infarct; E: Progesterone and trimetazidine combination treated I/R rat had smallest infarct area indicated by an arrow. . (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 6Infract volume and Brain swelling
Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6); Sham operated (SO); Ischemia reperfusion injury (I/R); Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg), trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg) group. Significant difference is aP < 0.05 vs SO group; bP < 0.05 vs I/R group; cP < 0.05 vs PG group.
Effect of treatment on oxidative stress markers.
| Groups | SOD (IU/mg of protein) | CAT (H2O2 consu/min/mg of protein) | GSH (μg/mg of protein) | MDA (nmol/mg of protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral | 9.03 ± 0.34 | 232.35 ± 5.16 | 21.39 ± 1.19 | 4.97 ± 0.62 |
| Contralateral | 9.22 ± 0.89 | 244.30 ± 11.77 | 21.67 ± 3.98 | 5.14 ± 0.39 |
| Ipsilateral | 4.17 ± 0.38a | 185.39 ± 22.92 | 5.20 ± 0.22a | 12.94 ± 0.67a |
| Contralateral | 6.48 ± 0.54 | 218.75 ± 21.49 | 15.69 ± 0.26 | 9.35 ± 0.66a |
| Ipsilateral | 8.00 ± 0.19b | 149.41 ± 12.69 | 9.97 ± 0.82ab | 8.63 ± 0.41a,b |
| Contralateral | 7.40 ± 0.50 | 190.8 ± 10.92 | 16.8 ± 3.51 | 7.91 ± 0.39a |
| Ipsilateral | 7.19 ± 0.14b | 206.2 ± 12.10 | 10.11 ± 0.31ab | 7.73 ± 0.44a,b |
| Contralateral | 7.24 ± 0.86 | 197.6 ± 9.64 | 11.34 ± 2.31 | 7.17 ± 1.00 |
| Ipsilateral | 9.19 ± 0.25b,c,d | 279.56 ± 20.36 | 14.84 ± 0.87ab | 6.42 ± 0.33a,b,d |
| Contralateral | 8.65 ± 0.53 | 209.16 ± 15.79 | 15.03 ± 1.57 | 6.60 ± 0.39b |
Table legend text: Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6); Sham operated (SO); Ischemia reperfusion injury (I/R); Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg) trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg) group. Significant difference is aP < 0.05 vs SO group; bP < 0.05 vs I/R group; cP < 0.05 vs PG group; dP < 0.05 vs TMZ group.
Effect of treatment MPO and Blood Brain Barrier permeability estimation.
| Groups | MPO units/mg of protein | Evans blue |
|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.97 ± 0.19 |
| Contralateral | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.87 ± 0.14 |
| Ipsilateral | 0.49 ± 0.03a | 3.86 ± 0.53a |
| Contralateral | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 2.79 ± 0.92 |
| Ipsilateral | 0.37 ± 0.02a,b | 1.53 ± 0.17ab |
| Contralateral | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 1.19 ± .013 |
| Ipsilateral | 0.36 ± 0.03a,b | 1.54 ± 0.13ab |
| Contralateral | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 1.50 ± 0.1 |
| Ipsilateral | 0.23 ± 0.02b,c,d | 1.35 ± 0.18ab |
| Contralateral | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 1.31 ± 0.15 |
Table legend text Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6); Sham operated (SO); Ischemia reperfusion injury (I/R); Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg) trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg) group. Significant difference is aP < 0.05 vs SO group; bP < 0.05 vs I/R group; cP < 0.05 vs PG group; dP < 0.05 vs TMZ group.
Fig. 7DNA damage and fragmentation
Gel electrophoresis of ipsilateral hemisphere of brain; Lane 1, 1-kb DNA standard; Lane 2, Sham control; Lane 3, IR control, indicates apoptotic cellular injury in the form laddering pattern; Lane 4, Progesterone treated, no fragmented DNA; Lane 5, Trimetazidine, absence of laddering of DNA stands; Lane 6, combination treated rat brain without any apparent DNA breaks.
Fig. 8Histopathology of Brain tissue
Photomicrographs (100X) of H& E stained brain slides after reperfusion injury; A: Sham operated showing no neuronal loss; B: Vehicle treated IR showing vacuolation and neuronal loss; C: Progesterone treated with improved neuronal architecture, few vacuolations and partial neuronal loss; D: Trimetazidine treated with indications of overall recovery, partial neuronal loss; E: PG + TMZ treated with marked improvement in cellular structure with minimum neuronal loss.
Fig. 9Graphical presentation of histological changes
The values represented as median of scores (n = 6); Sham operated (SO); Ischemia reperfusion injury (I/R); Progesterone PG (PG; 8 mg/kg), trimetazidine (TMZ; 25 mg/kg) group.