| Literature DB >> 35602132 |
Abstract
Since December 2019, the pandemic COVID-19 has been connected to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Early identification and diagnosis are essential goals for health practitioners because early symptoms correlate with those of other common illnesses including the common cold and flu. RT-PCR is frequently used to identify SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. Although this procedure can take up to 2 days to complete and sequential monitoring may be essential to figure out the potential of false-negative findings, RT-PCR test kits are apparently in low availability, highlighting the urgent need for more efficient methods of diagnosing COVID-19 patients. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based healthcare models are more effective at diagnosing and controlling large groups of people. Hence, this paper proposes a novel AI-enabled SARS detection framework. Here, the input CT images are collected and preprocessed using a block-matching filter and histogram equalization (HE). Segmentation is performed using Compact Entropy Rate Superpixel (CERS) technique. Features of segmented output are extracted using Histogram of Gradient (HOG). Feature selection is done using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The suggested Random Sigmoidal Artificial Neural Networks (RS-ANN) based classification approach effectively diagnoses the existence of the disease. The performance of the suggested Artificial intelligence model is analyzed and related to existing approaches. The suggested AI system may help identify COVID-19 patients more quickly than conventional approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Principal Component Analysis; Random Sigmoidal Artificial Neural Networks; artificial intelligence; block-matching filter; compact entropy rate superpixel; histogram equalization; histogram of gradient; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35602132 PMCID: PMC9114671 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Timeline of COVID-19.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the suggested methodology.
Patient characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Age, median | 42 (32–54) | <0.002 |
|
| ||
| Male | 3,365 (51.71) | - |
| Isolation treatment | 1,412 (21.6) | <0.001 |
| Travel history | 4,238 (65.2) | <0.002 |
|
| ||
| Cough | 1,976 (30.2) | <0.002 |
| Fever | 2,674 (41) | <0.001 |
| Muscle soreness | 25 (0.5) | 0.9181 |
| Runny nose | 548 (8.42) | <0.002 |
| Lung infection | 854 (12.99) | <0.002 |
| Diarrhea | 38 (0.58) | 0.3489 |
| Pneumonia | 488 (7.49) | <0.001 |
|
| 2,970 (46.5) | - |
Random Sigmoidal Artificial Neural Network (RS-ANN).
| w1, w2 ← Random number from [−1, 1] |
| w1- Hidden layer weight, w2 - Output layer weight |
| No. of. Correct = 0 |
| for i < No. of. TI do |
| for j < size (train) do |
| Inp (j) ← train (j) |
| HO (j) ← f [B; w1, Inp (j)] |
| Out (j) ← g [Bias; w2, HO (j)] |
| if Out (j) = TL (j) then |
| No. of. Correct+ = 1 |
| end if |
| del1 ← [Out (j) − TL (j) * (1 − out (j)2] |
| del2 ← (W2 * delta) * [1 − HO (j)2] |
| w1 ← w1 − alpha * [Inp(j) * del2] |
| w2 ← w2 − alpha * [HO(j) * del1] |
| end for |
| accuracy ← No. of. Correct /n |
| end for |
| if w1 > 0 then |
| w1 ← 1 |
| else |
| w1 ← 0 |
| end if |
| if w2 > 0 then |
| w2 ← 1 |
| else |
| w2 ← 0 |
| end if |
Figure 3No of dataset vs. accuracy.
Figure 4No of dataset vs. precision.
Figure 5No of dataset vs. recall.
Figure 6No of dataset vs. F1-score.
Comparison of traditional methods with proposed method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dense ( | 96.25 | 96.29 | 96.29 | 96.29 |
| Deep CNN ( | 99.4 | 99.6 | 94.25 | 66.4 |
| Google net ( | 91.75 | 90.20 | 93.50 | 91.82 |
| RS-ANN [Proposed] | 99.62 | 99.73 | 97 | 97 |