| Literature DB >> 35601787 |
Ümit Gürbüz1, Hatice Ahu Kahraman2, Arife Ezgi Telli1, Yusuf Biçer1, Yusuf Doğruer1.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the physicochemical characteristics, meat quality, oxidative stability and sensory properties of lamb meat during 0, 7 and 14 day of the dry aging process. The M. longissimus lumborum (LL) and M. longissimus thoracis (LT) muscles from male Akkaraman lambs were used. The pH values of the LT and LL cuts were not changed during the aging periods. The LT cuts had significantly higher weight loss, a* and b* values, and lower shear force compared to the LL cuts. However, dry aging led to greater decreases in shear force in the LL cuts on 7th day of aging. The total mesophilic aerobic counts, total psychrophilic counts, Enterobacteriaceae counts, lactic acid bacteria, and yeast-mold counts were increased during the aging process. The sensory panel scoring showed a significant difference in the LL cuts and no significant difference in the LT cuts compared to the control group. There were significant changes in sensory panel scores for the LL cuts, whereas there were no significant changes for the LT cuts according to the non-aged samples. In conclusion, dry aging improved the quality of both cuts, however, the LL muscle of lamb was more suitable for dry aging. Moreover, 7 days were sufficient to produce the desired sensory properties in the lamb loins. Increasing the aging time from 7 to 14 days did not appreciably affect the sensory attributes or tenderness.Entities:
Keywords: Color; Dry aging; Lamb meat; Quality; Texture
Year: 2022 PMID: 35601787 PMCID: PMC9094596 DOI: 10.30466/vrf.2020.116850.2869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res Forum ISSN: 2008-8140 Impact factor: 0.950
Physicochemical analyses results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 5.77 ± 0.00a | 5.86 ± 0.07 | 5.97 ± 0.05 | |
|
| 5.56 ± 0.01zb | 5.70 ± 0.01y | 5.91 ± 0.04x | *** | |
|
| *** | ||||
|
|
| 0.23 ± 0.02y | 0.55 ± 0.10xy | 0.69 ± 0.17x | * |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.06y | 0.62 ± 0.14x | 0.74 ± 0.16x | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 0.96 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.00 | |
|
| 0.97 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.00 | ||
|
| |||||
|
|
| 73.15 ± 0.80 | 71.47 ± 1.37 | 70.06 ± 1.48 | |
|
| 73.81 ± 0.58x | 72.25 ± 0.49y | 72.03 ± 0.39y | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 700 ± 15.00x | 609 ± 9.70y | 570 ± 9.50z | * |
|
| 700 ± 15.00x | 634 ± 9.80y | 607 ± 9.40y | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 22.96 ± 1.66xb | 18.95 ± 1.39y | 17.36 ± 0.74yb | * |
|
| 33.11 ± 1.72xa | 23.73 ± 1.97y | 22.45 ± 0.75ya | *** | |
|
| ** | *** |
LT: Longissimus thoracis; LL: Longissimus lumborum; TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; WBSF: Warner-Bratzler shear force.
ab Values within a column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); xyz Values within a row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and *** p < 0.001.
Fig. 1Weight loss of dry aged Longissimus thoracis (LT) and Longissimus Lumborum (LL) muscles during dry aging periods. The error bars represent the standard error (p> 0.05).
Color and sensory evaluation results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 36.97 ± 0.87a | 37.95 ± 1.15a | 36.14 ± 0.93 | |
|
| 34.16 ± 0.74b | 34.74 ± 0.69b | 35.26 ± 0.75 | ||
|
| * | * | |||
|
|
| 12.36 ± 0.57ya | 14.05 ± 0.33x | 14.42 ± 0.47x | ** |
|
| 12.41 ± 0.56b | 11.90 ± 0.75 | 11.07 ± 0.79 | ||
|
| * | ||||
|
|
| 7.23 ± 0.30y | 8.44 ± 0.52x | 9.53 ± 0.33x | ** |
|
| 7.68 ± 0.25 | 6.49 ± 0.27 | 6.80 ± 0.25 | ||
|
| |||||
|
|
| 7.33 ± 0.40 | 8.33 ± 0.30 | 8.22 ± 0.70 | |
|
| 7.00 ± 0.50y | 9.00 ± 0.50x | 9.22 ± 0.60x | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 7.00 ± 0.30 | 8.44 ± 0.50 | 7.56 ± 0.60 | |
|
| 6.22 ± 0.40y | 8.11 ± 0.40x | 7.89 ± 0.60x | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 7.56 ± 0.40 | 8.22 ± 0.50 | 8.22 ± 0.50 | |
|
| 6.67 ± 0.70y | 8.62 ± 0.40x | 8.37 ± 0.30xy | * | |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 7.33 ± 0.40 | 8.33 ± 0.40 | 8.11 ± 0.60 | |
|
| 7.00 ± 0.60y | 8.82 ± 0.40x | 8.70 ± 0.50x | * | |
|
|
LT: M. Longissimus thoracis, LL: M. Longissimus lumborum.
ab Values within a column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); xy Values within a row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05); *p < 0.05; and ** p < 0.001.
Fig. 2Microbiological results of the LT samples (log CFU g-1) LT: M. Longissimus thoracis; TMAC: Total mesophilic aerobic counts; TPC: Total psychrophilic counts; LAB: Lactic acid bacteria. The error bars represent the standard error (p > 0.05).
Fig. 3Microbiological results of the LL samples (log CFU g-1). LL: M. Longissimus lumborum; TMAC: Total mesophilic aerobic counts; TPC: Total psychrophilic counts; LAB: Lactic acid bacteria. The error bars represent the standard error (p > 0.05)