| Literature DB >> 35601768 |
Abstract
Taxonomic evaluations are needed to accurately determine the host selection of fish parasites. The present study is a multidisciplinary research in the field of basic and fish diseases sciences. The description of the hybrid species of Squalius orientalis and Alburnus derjugini and infection of Ligula intestinalis in these hybrid fish were reported for the first time from the Kürtün Dam Lake in northeast Turkey. A total of 450 fish were sampled in March, August, and October in 2020 using gillnets. Detailed morphological characteristics (n = 24) were compared to determine the difference among ancestors and hybrid species. The prevalence of L. intestinalis between the sampling periods and the size groups of fish (0 - 10, 11 - 15, and ≥16 cm in length) were examined. Moreover, the highest prevalence of the parasite was observed in October (78.94 %), with a size range of 0 - 10 cm in length (77.8 %). In addition, the total prevalence of the parasite was 48.44 %. The results revealed that most of the diagnostic metric and meristic features of hybrid fish were ranging between the data of S. orientalis and A. derjugini. According to previous reports, when hybrid individuals were compared with their ancestors in terms of prevalence, hybrid individuals were more susceptible to L. intestinalis infections. This study was unique as it provided the first record of L. intestinalis in a hybrid fish population.Entities:
Keywords: Hybridization; cestode; disease; fish; parasite; prevalence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35601768 PMCID: PMC9075872 DOI: 10.2478/helm-2022-0008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Helminthologia ISSN: 0440-6605 Impact factor: 1.176
Fig. 1Map of sampling area (Kürtün Dam Lake).
Morphometric comparison of S. orientalis x A. derjugini and its ancestors.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 20 | 10 | 15 | |||
| Standard Length (mm) | 145-185 | 116-115 | 83-132 | |||
| In percent of standard length | Range (mean) | SD | Range (mean) | SD | Range (mean) | SD |
| Head length | 24.0 – 28.6 (27.0) | 1.0 | 21.5 – 23.7 (23.0) | 0.7 | 24.6 – 27.4 (26.0) | 0.8 |
| Body depth of dorsal-fin origin | 21.6 – 25.0 (23.4) | 0.1 | 23.4 – 27.3 (26.0) | 1.3 | 19.6 – 23.4 (21.0) | 1.2 |
| Predorsal length | 53.3 – 57.4 (55.4) | 1.1 | 52.3 – 56.6 (54.2) | 1.4 | 54.4 – 58.1 (56.0) | 1.1 |
| Prepelvic length | 50.3 – 55.4 (53.5) | 1.2 | 46.7 – 50.3 (48.5) | 1.0 | 47.8 – 50.5 (49.2) | 0.8 |
| Preanal length | 71.6 – 75.6 (73.7) | 1.2 | 63.8 – 70.0 (67.4) | 1.9 | 65.3 – 69.6 (67.4) | 1.2 |
| Pectoral-fin origin to anal fin | 47.8 – 52.3 (49.6) | 1.3 | 43.2 – 47.7 (45.6) | 1.4 | 40.5 – 45.7 (42.6) | 1.2 |
| Pectoral-fin origin to pelvic fin | 26.4 – 30.8 (28.2) | 1.2 | 23.4 – 27.1 (25.5) | 1.1 | 22.2 – 25.2 (23.8) | 0.9 |
| Pelvic-fin origin to anal fin | 19.8 – 23.8 (21.7) | 1.1 | 19.2 – 24.8 (21.1) | 1.8 | 16.9 – 21.5 (19.0) | 1.0 |
| Dorsal-fin height | 18.6 – 21.2 (19.9) | 0.8 | 19.3 – 22.1 (20.4) | 0.8 | 16.7 – 19.5 (18.2) | 0.8 |
| Anal-fin length | 16.2 – 18.8 (17.5) | 0.7 | 14.5 – 18.5 (16.0) | 1.2 | 12.5 – 15.8 (14.6) | 0.8 |
| Pectoral-fin length | 17.6 – 20.8 (19.4) | 0.8 | 15.2 – 18.9 (17.3) | 1.1 | 19.5 – 22.1 (20.8) | 0.7 |
| Pelvic-fin length | 14.5 – 16.7 (15.7) | 0.5 | 13.7 – 17.4 (15.5) | 0.9 | 14.1 – 16.2 (15.4) | 0.6 |
| Upper caudal-fin lobe | 24.2 – 29.5 (26.3) | 1.2 | 23.4 – 27.0 (25.4) | 1.0 | 24.4 – 28.9 (26.6) | 1.4 |
| Length of middle caudal-fin ray | 13.7 – 17.4 (16.1) | 0.9 | 10.6 – 13.0 (12.3) | 0.7 | 11.8 – 13.8 (12.6) | 0.7 |
| Length of caudal peduncule | 18.1 – 20.7 (19.4) | 0.8 | 20.9 – 24.6 (22.2) | 1.2 | 17.8 – 20.3 (18.8) | 0.9 |
| Depth of caudal peduncle | 10.7 – 12.2 (11.6) | 0.4 | 8.9 – 10.9 (10.0) | 0.6 | 8.1 – 9.3 (8.7) | 0.3 |
|
| ||||||
| Snout length | 29.7 – 34.6 (32.0) | 1.4 | 24.4 – 30.4 (26.3) | 1.7 | 27.2 – 30.1 (28.3) | 0.9 |
| Eye diameter | 17.2 – 21.1 (19.3) | 1.1 | 28.2 – 31.4 (30.1) | 1.1 | 26.5 – 31.7 (29.7) | 1.5 |
| Interorbital width | 39.4 – 43.3 (41.1) | 1.1 | 29.9 – 33.8 (31.5) | 1.4 | 25.5 – 31.0 (28.0) | 1.7 |
| Head width at nape | 56.4 – 63.8 (59.5) | 2.3 | 46.2 – 51.9 (49.8) | 1.8 | 45.3 – 51.0 (47.6) | 1.6 |
| Head depth at nape | 63.4 – 72.7 (67.8) | 2.8 | 67.8 – 76.5 (70.5) | 2.7 | 61.1 – 67.5 (63.8) | 1.6 |
| Snout width at nostrils | 35.1 – 39.4 (37.0) | 1.2 | 27.6 – 33.7 (30.0) | 1.7 | 28.1 – 34.5 (30.2) | 1.6 |
| Mouth width | 25.3 – 32.4 (28.3) | 1.8 | 20.5 – 25.0 (22.0) | 1.5 | 20.1 – 25.0 (22.1) | 1.4 |
Fig. 2Squalius orientalis.
Fig. 3Alburnus derjugini.
Fig. 4Hybrid of Squalius orientalis x Alburnus derjugini.
Fig. 5a, A hybrid individual with Ligula intestinalis plerocercoids; b, after removing L. intestinalis plerocercoids from the individual;c, removed L. intestinalis plerocercoids
Frequency distribution of meristic features of hybrid population and its ancestors.
| Lateral line scales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | ||||
|
| 20 | 1 | 4 |
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Hybrid | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
|
| 30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | - | - | 1 | |||
| Tranversal scales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Above lateral line | Below lateral line | Branched anal-fin rays | Gill rakers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | … | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ||
|
| 20 |
| 13 | - | - | - | - | 14 | 6 | - | 4 | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 13 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Hybrid | 10 | - | - | - | 9 | 1 | - | - | 10 | - | - | - | 7 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
|
| 30 | - | - | - | 2 | 16 | 12 | - | 13 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 | 13 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Fig. 6Ligula intestinalis plerocercoids prevelance according to the different months.
Fig. 7Ligula intestinalis plerocercoids prevalence according to fish size ranges. n: sampled fish, IF: infected fish, P: prevalence.
After 2007, records of Ligula intestinalis from some Cyprinids in Turkey.
| Host species | Actual Taxonomic Status | Area | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Aegean |
|
|
|
| Mediterranean Aegean | Aydogan et al., 2018 Demirtaş, 2011 |
|
|
| Aegean | |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Central Anatolian | İnnal et al., 2010. |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Aegean | Kurupınar and Öztürk, 2009 |
|
|
| Marmara |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Central Anatolian |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Black Sea | Kayiş et al., 2020 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Black Sea |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| North-Eastern Anatolia |
|
The species remarked with asterix currently placed in the following families: *Leuciscidae **Tincidae ***Gobioidae