Heather Tick1, Arya Nielsen2, Paula M Gardiner3, Samantha Simmons4, Kathryn A Hansen5, Jeffery A Dusek6,7. 1. Department of Family Medicine, and Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 4. Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine & Health, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Vanderbilt School of Nursing and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
The Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine & Health is a recognized leader in
evidence-based integrative medicine (www.imconsortium.org). It is a
member-supported organization with over 76 highly esteemed academic medical centers and health
systems members; our vision is to transform the healthcare system by promoting access to
evidence-based healthcare options for all.We whole heartily welcome the CDC’s support for evidence-based nonpharmacologic strategies as
first line options for acute and chronic pain care, in alignment with the 2010 Army Surgeon
General’s Pain Management Task Force Report,
the American College of Physician’s Guidelines,
and the Veterans Health Administration
that encourage evidence-based nonpharmacologic options early in patient treatment
protocols.
The 2016 CDC Guideline
The 2016 CDC Guideline for safe opioid use suggested limitations for opioid dosing,
discouraged dose escalation to deal with tolerance, discouraged the initiation of opioids
for chronic pain conditions, and recommended brief courses of opioids for acute pain.
These Guidelines were important in the re-evaluation of opioid policies in many
jurisdictions: raising awareness of the failure of opioids to address chronic pain and the
dangers of continuing on the path laid out by opioid producers.
However, the 2016 Guideline had an unintended consequence: some opioid prescribers
were overly enthusiastic in reducing opioid prescribing thereby forcing patients into rapid
tapers or even ‘abandoning’ patients on long-term opioids. The 2022 Draft Guideline
appropriately clarifies the CDC’s position to avoid unnecessary suffering for people in pain
and to avoid the liability of tolerance, addiction, and the increasing number of deaths
associated with opioids.
The 2022 CDC Draft Guideline
The 2022 CDC Draft Guideline (https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/guideline-update/index.html) has detailed the past
and ongoing tragedy in pain care associated with the over-reliance on opioids and other
pharmacologic options. At the center of the opioid/pain crisis is the need to care for
persons in pain with evidence-based, effective, low risk options that also maximize patient
function and quality of life (QOL).The 2022 CDC Draft Guideline favors an individualized approach to opioid prescribing that
encourages collaborative decisions between patients and prescribers. The collaborative
approach may reduce rapid or forced opioid tapers and be more effective at sustained dose
reduction. However, collaborative decisions regarding pain care, including opioid use, can
only work when providers and patients are informed about the risks of opioids as well as the
advantages of other effective and safer strategies.The over-reliance on opioids grew out of the promotion of opioid disinformation that
coincided with an ‘opioid knowledge deficit’ among providers that continues in medical
education today.
There is also a ‘knowledge deficit’ in the appropriate use of effective
nonpharmacologic care. It would be appropriate for the CDC Guideline to address this
deficit. Ensuring that prescribers have sufficient knowledge of ‘opioid risks and best
practices’ and are allowed adequate compensated time with patients to support complex pain
care conversations are essential for success in collaborative opioid management within the
framework of comprehensive pain care. Safe and effective options are well studied and within reach.
Among our member institutions, we have exemplary pilot models of comprehensive pain
care approaches and innovative payment models that are advancing access and demonstrating
efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness.The rate of inadvertent and/or intentional opioid overdoses continues to rise.
In light of the record number of deaths associated with opioids (including fentanyl),
promoting the perception that any opioid use is safe should be avoided at all costs.
A more relaxed attitude by the CDC regarding opioid tapering and more permissive dose limits
may inadvertently be interpreted as a decreased level of concern from the CDC regarding the
risk of opioid related deaths as well as the liability of other opioid adverse effects
including poor function, QOL and the financial burden of opioid-related abuse.The 2022 Draft Guideline for acute and postoperative pain care is suggesting more
flexibility by allowing providers to increase the number of days for prescribed opioids. We
are very concerned since extending the number of days of opioid supply for acute pain has
been shown to increase the risk of chronic opioid use.
Additionally, if those doses go unused, there will be increased opioid supply in the
community leading to increased risk for non-prescribed use by the patient or others. We
recognize that the rationale for extending the number of day’s supply of opioids may be
driven in part by the convenience of patients and their surgical teams. The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rules of global payments for surgeries disallow billing
for patient visits during the post-op period.
As such, patients or their proxy, may need to attend the doctor’s office to assess
pain management in a non-compensated visit. Extending opioid number of days’ supply in
general and as a remedy for payment limitations may increase the risk of chronic opioid use
or misuse and is especially ill-advised when the best interests of the patient and the
community are not well served.In this reconsideration, the CDC appears to accept a continued reliance on opioids for
acute pain without advancing a clear strategy to increase access to evidence-based
nonpharmacologic therapies that are effective and opioid sparing.
Opioids are familiar to prescribers, are covered by insurance and simple to prescribe.
Concurrently, most insurers do not sufficiently cover safe and effective
nonpharmacologic therapies. Even with calls from the National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering and Medicine for insurers to facilitate reimbursement for comprehensive pain
care including proven nonpharmacologic strategies,
insurance coverage lags. These updated guidelines can continue the CDC’s important
work recommending safe and optimal comprehensive approaches to pain that includes
appropriate opioid prescribing. However, currently there is not a level playing field of
access to opioids and other safer, effective strategies that can be used alone or in
conjunction with medications.In our perspective, the impact of the Draft Guideline’s altruistic intent will be blunted
by the barriers that continue to deny clinicians and their patients access to comprehensive
treatments. We advocate that the CDC use their significant authority to reinforce the
selective use of opioids for as few days as possible after an acute event and promote the
use of evidence-based nonpharmacologic approaches to provide optimal safe and effective pain
care.
Summary
We commend the CDC’s support for evidence-based nonpharmacologic strategies as first line
options for acute and chronic pain care. A model is needed for widespread dissemination of
and insurance coverage for safer, effective pain care options. Prioritizing effective
nonpharmacologic strategies would advance the goals of improved outcomes while
simultaneously reducing harms associated with opioid use and abuse. The Draft Guidelines
must address the larger issue of what can be done to improve the safety and effectiveness
of care for pain. Safe and effective options are well studied and within reach.
Continued overdependence on opioids for acute and chronic pain care sustains the
risk that opioid use, leading to tolerance and addiction, will not abate.
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Timothy J Wilt; Robert M McLean; Mary Ann Forciea; Thomas D Denberg; Michael J Barry; Cynthia Boyd; R Dobbin Chow; Nick Fitterman; Russell P Harris; Linda L Humphrey; Sandeep Vijan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 25.391