Anafi Nur'aini1, Ilwhan Oh1. 1. Departments of Applied Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Department of Energy Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, Gyeongbuk 39177, South Korea.
Abstract
A deep etching method for silicon "micro"structures was successfully developed. This wet etching process is based on metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE), which was previously mainly utilized to etch the features that have lateral dimensions of "nanometers." In this novel MACE, the critical improvement was to promote the "out-of-plane" mass transfer at the metal/Si interface with an ultrathin metal film. This enabled us to etch micrometer-wide holes, which was previously challenging due to the mass transport limitation. In addition, it was found that when ethanol was used as a solvent instead of water, the formation of porous defects was suppressed. Under the optimized etch conditions, deep (>200 μm) and vertical (>88°) holes could be carved out at a fast etch rate (>0.4 μm/min). This novel deep MACE will find utility in applications such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices or biosensors.
A deep etching method for silicon "micro"structures was successfully developed. This wet etching process is based on metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE), which was previously mainly utilized to etch the features that have lateral dimensions of "nanometers." In this novel MACE, the critical improvement was to promote the "out-of-plane" mass transfer at the metal/Si interface with an ultrathin metal film. This enabled us to etch micrometer-wide holes, which was previously challenging due to the mass transport limitation. In addition, it was found that when ethanol was used as a solvent instead of water, the formation of porous defects was suppressed. Under the optimized etch conditions, deep (>200 μm) and vertical (>88°) holes could be carved out at a fast etch rate (>0.4 μm/min). This novel deep MACE will find utility in applications such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices or biosensors.
Silicon
micromachining is a technology to fabricate various micro-
or nanostructures on a silicon substrate through deep etching.[1] Silicon micromachining is used in various applications
such as vertical flash memory, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)
devices, and biosensors. In general, silicon micromachining can be
classified into two categories. The first category is dry etching.
In most practices, deep reactive ion etch (DRIE) is used to fabricate
high aspect ratio structures on silicon substrates. This method has
advantages in that the etching rate is fast and the etch profile is
clean. However, disadvantages are the high cost of the DRIE equipment
and the formation of a residual film after the process. The second
category is wet etching in a liquid etchant. Compared to dry etching,
the process cost of wet etching is low, but the etching rate is relatively
slow, and limitations exist in the etch profile that can be produced
by a specific wet etch recipe. For example, alkaline etching of Si
at an elevated temperature produces an anisotropic profile with the
Si(111) surface.[2] However, recent advances
in Si wet etching have led to improved performances. For example,
Cozzi et al. reported silicon electrochemical etching (ECE), which
shows an etching rate faster than the dry etch process.[3]The most recently developed Si wet etching
method is metal-assisted
chemical etch (MACE).[4−6] In traditional etching, the substrate area where
the pattern (that is, the etch mask) is present is protected from
etching, and the area that is exposed to the etchant is etched. In
contrast, MACE exhibits a peculiar phenomenon in which the area covered
by the metal pattern is etched. This is because the metal layer functions
as a catalyst to reduce oxidation and supplies holes to the underlying
Si substrate.[7]The principle of metal-assisted
chemical etching is shown in Figure . A thin metal layer
is deposited on the Si substrate and patterned by photolithography.
Typically, noble metals such as Ag,[7,8] Au,[9] Pd,[10,11] and Pt[11] are utilized as a catalyst. Then, the patterned substrate
is immersed in a mixture of an oxidizing agent (hydrogen peroxide)
and an etchant (hydrofluoric acid).
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of metal-assisted chemical
etching (MACE). H2O2 and HF as reactants and
the metal layer as a
catalyst. The reduction of H2O2 produces holes,
which then oxidize the Si layer.
Schematic diagram of metal-assisted chemical
etching (MACE). H2O2 and HF as reactants and
the metal layer as a
catalyst. The reduction of H2O2 produces holes,
which then oxidize the Si layer.The metal layer on the silicon substrate functions as a catalyst
and cathode at the same time. On the metal catalyst, hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) is reduced to generate holes.These
holes are diffused through the metal layer and injected into
the silicon substrate, which acts as an anode. Si is oxidized by the
injected holes and dissolved at the Si/metal interface by hydrofluoric
acid (HF) in the following reactionNote that reaction occurs at the interface between the Si substrate
and the overlying metal layer, which means that the overlying metal
film will hinder the mass transfer of reactants and products. For
a relatively thick metal layer (>50 nm), the maximum mass transfer
occurs in the in-plane mode. That is, the reaction products should
diffuse along with the extremely thin space between the metal and
the substrate before escaping through the edge of the metal layer
(Mode I in Figure ). This is the reason why the MACE process has been adopted mostly
to fabricate nanostructures, where the in-plane mass transfer is much
easier. However, for the “micro”structures, the in-plane
mass transfer takes so long that nonuniform etching occurs along the
metal layer.[7]As the “in-plane”
mass transfer is too slow to etch
the metal films with a micrometer dimension, it is devised that enhancing
the “out-of-plane” mass transfer (Mode II in Figure ) can be a solution.
When the metal layer becomes extremely thin (<10 nm), numerous
pinholes in the ultrathin metal layer should promote the out-of-plane
mass transfer of reactants and products across the metal-covered substrate.
In fact, our previous report showed that the etch rate in MACE was
significantly enhanced for ultrathin metal layers (3–10 nm).[9] More recently, Kim et al. showed that the MACE
of Si microstructures having lateral dimensions from 5 μm up
to millimeters is possible with an ultrathin metal layer (5–10
nm).[12] They found that the Au/Ag bilayer
configuration leads to a quite stable etch reaction upon a prolonged
etch duration of up to >5 h. In another report involving deep etching
of 50 μm-width features, Miao et al. found that the silicon
substrate can be etched with smooth sidewalls with an etchant solution
containing ethanol, instead of the conventional aqueous-based solution.[13]In this work, we customized and optimized
the conventional MACE
process, with which the etching of features having lateral dimensions
exceeding micrometers was not feasible due to the mass transfer limitations.
We showed that by enhancing the out-of-plane mass transfer with an
ultrathin permeable metal film, the features with lateral dimensions
exceeding tens of micrometers can be fabricated by the customized
MACE. Furthermore, to minimize the formation of a porous layer and
maximize the etching rate, the etching solution composition was optimized
with respect to the nature of the metal layer and the solvent. The
customized MACE process, which can fabricate a high aspect ratio Si
structure with lateral dimensions exceeding tens of micrometers up
to millimeters, will find its utility in microelectromechanical systems
(MEMSs) and micro total analysis system (μTAS) applications.
Experimental Section
In this work, we have carried
out a MACE process on a silicon wafer
(p-type; 10 Ω·cm) patterned by photolithography. The mask
design for a mesh pattern is shown in Figure . This mask was used to create a metal pattern
on the silicon wafer through the lift-off process. The design looks
like a honeycomb with a hexagonal diameter of 60 μm, and the
space between each hexagon is 12 μm.
Figure 2
(a) Mask design for the
metal pattern. The white part is lifted,
leaving a honeycomb pattern on the metal layer. The diameter of each
hexagon is 60 μm, and the space is 12 μm. (b) Schematic
of macropore fabrication, including wafer cleaning, lithography, metal
deposition, and lift-off, followed by wet metal-assisted chemical
etching (MACE).
(a) Mask design for the
metal pattern. The white part is lifted,
leaving a honeycomb pattern on the metal layer. The diameter of each
hexagon is 60 μm, and the space is 12 μm. (b) Schematic
of macropore fabrication, including wafer cleaning, lithography, metal
deposition, and lift-off, followed by wet metal-assisted chemical
etching (MACE).For the lift-off process, a photoresist
was spin-coated on the
Si wafer and patterned using the mask, as shown in Figure b. After UV exposure and development,
the patterned Si was cleaned by dipping in a buffered oxide etchant
(BOE). A single or double metal layer was deposited using an e-beam
evaporator. Subsequently, the photoresist was lifted off, leaving
the desired metal patterns.The MACE process began briefly by
dipping the sample in 50% HF
for 20 s to remove the native oxide in the Si surface. After rinsing
with distilled water and drying with N2 gas, the Si was
immersed in the etching solution, which contained 5–8 M HF
and 0.2–0.8 M H2O2. The solvent for the
etching solution was distilled water, ethanol, or water/ethanol mixed
solution (60–80% (v/v) ethanol). A medium-sized (∼2
L) etching bath was utilized so that even after extended etching the
consumption of reagents was minimal (<2%). After immersing for
varied hours, the sample was sonicated in distilled water for 10 min.
All etching processes were conducted at room temperature with no stirring.
For characterization of the etch results, scanning electron microscopes
(MAIA III TESCAN and JEOL JSM-6701F) were employed.
Results and Discussion
Effect of an Ultrathin
Metal Film
To apply the MACE process to Si micromachining,
the mass transfer
of the etched material at the metal/Si interface should be promoted,
as mentioned above. In the relatively thick metal layer of 20 nm or
thicker commonly used in most MACE processes, only in-plane mass transfer
is possible, and so the mass transfer is inevitably limited. In this
study, an ultrathin metal layer (5–10 nm) was used to promote
the out-of-plane mass transfer, enabling uniform etching in the entire
area of the micropattern.Figure shows the MACE results with the ultrathin Ag films
(5 nm). Ag is one of the most widely used metal materials in MACE.
In the case of the ultrathin Ag film, the film is composed of unconnected
nanoparticles, and when the MACE process is performed, these nanoparticles
appear to penetrate the Si substrate and form a porous layer. In addition,
a substantial amount of Ag itself may be corroded. The standard potential
(E°) of Ag is 0.80 V; thus, Ag can be easily
oxidized and dissolved by the oxidizing agent H2O2 (E° = 1.76V). A single Ag thin film has been
previously used for nanostructure fabrication but is not suitable
for deep etching of Si microstructures.
Figure 3
(a) Top-view and (b)
cross-section of MACE results from the Si/5
nm Ag with an etching time of 90 min. The etchant consists of an aqueous
solution of 5.3 M HF and 0.42 M H2O2.
(a) Top-view and (b)
cross-section of MACE results from the Si/5
nm Ag with an etching time of 90 min. The etchant consists of an aqueous
solution of 5.3 M HF and 0.42 M H2O2.A Ag/Au bimetallic thin film was tested to compensate
for the instability
of a single Ag thin film. Kim et al. found that the Au/Ag bilayer
configuration had benefits in that a thin Ag layer promotes adhesion.[12]Figure shows the results of the MACE process for the Si/5 nm Ag/10
nm Au. Compared to the case of a single Ag thin film, the etching
result is relatively improved. The porous layer formation is not observed,
and the original pattern shape is mostly maintained even after a long
period of etching for more than 6 h. Since Au (E°
= 1.83V) is much more stable than Ag, the upper Au thin film seems
to protect the lower Ag layer from corrosion. However, as the etching
time increases, the diameter of the metal pattern becomes shrunk,
and porous defects begin to appear. The Ag thin film layer is presumed
to be gradually corroded over time and peeled off with the upper Au
thin film.
Figure 4
MACE results of the metal bilayer Si/5 nm Ag/10 nm Au. The etchant
consists of an aqueous solution of 8 M HF and 0.2 M H2O2, and the etching times were (a) 3 h, (b) 6 h, and (c) 9 h.
MACE results of the metal bilayer Si/5 nm Ag/10 nm Au. The etchant
consists of an aqueous solution of 8 M HF and 0.2 M H2O2, and the etching times were (a) 3 h, (b) 6 h, and (c) 9 h.It was assessed that even the Ag/Au bimetallic
thin film was not
suitable for the MACE process for a long time due to its instability
and the formation of porous defects. Therefore, the MACE process using
a single Au thin film was attempted. (Figure ) In the case of a single Au thin film, the
size of the original metal pattern was well maintained even after
deep etching, and the etching rate was faster than that of a single
Ag thin film or Au/Ag bimetallic thin film. This is due to the stability
of the Au thin film. Nevertheless, porous defects were observed after
the MACE process. It is presumed that when the etching byproducts
generated at the bottom of the hole diffuse to the top, some of them
are adsorbed to the inner wall and create porous defects on the inner
wall.
Figure 5
(a) Top-view and (b) cross-sectional of MACE results from a single
metal layer Si/10 nm Au with an etching time of 3 h. The etchant consists
of an aqueous solution of 8 M HF and 0.2 M H2O2.
(a) Top-view and (b) cross-sectional of MACE results from a single
metal layer Si/10 nm Au with an etching time of 3 h. The etchant consists
of an aqueous solution of 8 M HF and 0.2 M H2O2.
Effect
of Solvent
When a single Au
thin film was used, the stability of the thin metal film was improved,
but the problem of the generation of porous defects remained. To solve
this problem, a solvent other than water was tested. According to
previous reports, porous defect formation could be minimized by adding
ethanol to the etching solution.[13]Figure shows the
effect of the addition of ethanol to the etch profile. The etch profile
was significantly improved with ethanol addition compared to a pure
aqueous solution. No porous defect formation was observed either on
the inner wall or the bottom of the hole. On the other hand, the etching
rate was decreased compared to pure water, probably because the viscosity
of the solution increases when ethanol is added, which slows down
the mass transfer.
Figure 6
MACE results of Si/10 nm Au from different solvents: (a)
water/ethanol
(2:8 v/v) and (b) pure ethanol. The etchant contains 8 M HF and 0.2
M H2O2. The etching time for all samples was
3 h.
MACE results of Si/10 nm Au from different solvents: (a)
water/ethanol
(2:8 v/v) and (b) pure ethanol. The etchant contains 8 M HF and 0.2
M H2O2. The etching time for all samples was
3 h.The reason for the excellent etch
profile in the ethanol solvent
is not clearly understood yet. One possibility is that ethanol is
much less polar than water, and thus the corrosion and dissolution
of the metal layer are minimized. In this case, it is possible to
prevent the metal catalyst from readsorbing on the inner wall of the
hole and acting as seeds for the pore formation reaction.
Maximization of the Etch Rate and Prolonged
Etching
Compared to the conventional Si dry etching method
(DRIE), MACE wet etching has a considerably slower etching rate, and
so it is necessary to increase the MACE etching rate. The etching
rate can be optimized mainly by controlling the concentration of the
oxidizing agent H2O2 in the etching solution.[14]Figure shows the MACE etching results according to the H2O2 concentration. As expected, the etching rate increased
as the concentration of H2O2 increased, but
the etching rate was saturated at [H2O2] = ∼0.8
M. This implies that the etch rate might be influenced by the concentration
gradient as the etching solution is unstirred. Even at a fast etching
rate, the etch profile after MACE etching showed an excellent cross-sectional
profile (Figure S1). However, we observed
that porous layers begin to form on the top portion of the etched
structure after the prolonged etch time (see Figure S3). So, we found that the optimized [H2O2] is ∼0.4 M.
Figure 7
Graph of the etching rate as a function of H2O2 concentration. The etching rate increased as the concentration
of
H2O2 increased. The etchant consists of an ethanolic
solution of 8 M HF.
Graph of the etching rate as a function of H2O2 concentration. The etching rate increased as the concentration
of
H2O2 increased. The etchant consists of an ethanolic
solution of 8 M HF.As the MACE process parameters
have been optimized for microstructures,
deep etch was performed for a long time using the optimized conditions.
As shown in Figure , the prolonged etch exhibits a uniform etch rate for 10 h or longer.
This indicates little corrosion of metal catalyst even during deep
etch, and mass transfer from the bottom of the deep hole proceeds
uniformly. A smooth etch profile is fabricated even after prolonged
etching, and no porous defects were observed (Figure S2). Since the thickness of an ordinary Si wafer is
100–400 μm, it is also possible to fabricate even a through-hole
on the Si substrate by the deep MACE process developed in this study.[15]
Figure 8
Deep MACE results showing etching depth as a function
of the etch
time. The etchant consists of an ethanolic solution of 8 M HF and
0.4 M H2O2.
Deep MACE results showing etching depth as a function
of the etch
time. The etchant consists of an ethanolic solution of 8 M HF and
0.4 M H2O2.The etch profile fabricated by the optimized deep etch condition
is shown in Figure . After about 10 h of etching, a deep hole exceeding 200 μm
was produced with a very smooth and vertical (>85°) profile.
We note that the wall thickness at the upper part is somewhat smaller
than that at the bottom, which can be attributed to the remote etching
in MACE. That is, although most of the etching proceeds in the shallow
area of the Si–metal contact, some of the injected holes diffuse
out and reach the upper part of the structure, leading to the thinning
of the Si wall.[16,17]
Figure 9
MACE results of Si/10 nm Au with an etching
time of 10 h. The etchant
consists of an ethanolic solution of 8 M HF and 0.4 M H2O2.
MACE results of Si/10 nm Au with an etching
time of 10 h. The etchant
consists of an ethanolic solution of 8 M HF and 0.4 M H2O2.
Conclusions
A deep etching method of micropatterns on Si based on metal-assisted
chemical etching was successfully developed, which was impossible
with the common MACE process. In this deep MACE, the critical improvement
was to promote the out-of-plane mass transfer at the metal/Si interface
using an ultrathin metal film. In addition, it was found that when
ethanol was used as a solvent instead of water, the formation of porous
defects was suppressed. Under these optimized deep etch conditions,
very deep (>200 μm) and vertical (>85°) holes could
be
etched at a fast etch rate (>0.4 μm/min). We take these results
as evidence for the out-of-plane mass transfer because the conventional
MACE (having a thick metal film with a laterally micrometer-sized
dimension) exhibits an order of magnitude slower etch rate (∼0.02
μm/min) and nonuniform etch profile.[7] Using this new deep MACE process, various structures required for
MEMS devices or biosensors will be manufactured at a very low cost
and on a large scale.
Authors: Konstantin Tamarov; Joseph D Swanson; Bret A Unger; Kurt W Kolasinski; Alexis T Ernst; Mark Aindow; Vesa-Pekka Lehto; Joakim Riikonen Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 9.229