Wahyu Meka1, Janos Szuhanszki2, Karen Finney2, Bijal Gudka3, Jenny Jones3, Mohamed Pourkashanian2, Paul S Fennell1. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England, United Kingdom. 2. Energy 2050, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom. 3. School of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Biomass combustion equipment is often susceptible to ash deposition due to the relatively significant quantities of potassium, silicon, and other ash-forming elements in biomass. To evaluate the propensity for ash deposition resulting from biomass combustion, a biomass combustion model was integrated with a chemical equilibrium model to predict the fate and occurrence of ash-forming elements in a pilot-scale entrained-flow burner. The integrated model simulated the combustion of white wood (virgin wood) and recycled wood (treated wood) previously combusted in the burner. The key advantage of this model in comparison to a model with general equilibrium assumed is that it was able to consider the rate of release of trace and minor species with time, the local equilibrium in the particles, and separately, that in the continuum phase (which also included any solid or liquid materials nucleating). The simulation generated the fate and occurrence profiles of each ash-forming element along the burner. The qualitative comparisons between the modeled profiles and the previous experimental findings under similar operating conditions show reasonable agreement. The concentrations of ash-forming elements released from the burner were also compared with the experimental online inductively coupled plasma readings. However, the latter comparison shows overestimation using the modeled results and might suggest that further considerations of other parameters such as ash nucleation and coagulation are required. Nonetheless, based on the ongoing performance of the integrated model, future use of the model might be expanded to a broader range of problematic solid fuels such as herbaceous biomass or municipal solid waste.
Biomass combustion equipment is often susceptible to ash deposition due to the relatively significant quantities of potassium, silicon, and other ash-forming elements in biomass. To evaluate the propensity for ash deposition resulting from biomass combustion, a biomass combustion model was integrated with a chemical equilibrium model to predict the fate and occurrence of ash-forming elements in a pilot-scale entrained-flow burner. The integrated model simulated the combustion of white wood (virgin wood) and recycled wood (treated wood) previously combusted in the burner. The key advantage of this model in comparison to a model with general equilibrium assumed is that it was able to consider the rate of release of trace and minor species with time, the local equilibrium in the particles, and separately, that in the continuum phase (which also included any solid or liquid materials nucleating). The simulation generated the fate and occurrence profiles of each ash-forming element along the burner. The qualitative comparisons between the modeled profiles and the previous experimental findings under similar operating conditions show reasonable agreement. The concentrations of ash-forming elements released from the burner were also compared with the experimental online inductively coupled plasma readings. However, the latter comparison shows overestimation using the modeled results and might suggest that further considerations of other parameters such as ash nucleation and coagulation are required. Nonetheless, based on the ongoing performance of the integrated model, future use of the model might be expanded to a broader range of problematic solid fuels such as herbaceous biomass or municipal solid waste.
The global energy demand is predicted
to grow by more than twice
its current value by 2040. Unless there is a change in future energy
policies, this growth will contribute to a global energy-related CO2 emission increase of 10 Gt.[1] This
emission increase is corroborated by a study revealing that there
was a 2.7% increase of global carbon emission between 2015 and 2018
due to intense coal and oil utilization for driving economic growth
in China and India.[2]Coal replacement
by biomass in solid fuel combustion is one option
to reduce global carbon emission. Biomass combustion features no net
CO2 addition to the atmosphere since the released carbon
originates from the CO2 absorbed by the plants that are
the precursors for biomass. Biomass combustion also promotes reduced
environmental pollution since biomass has lower sulfur, nitrogen,
and heavy metal content than coal.[3]Biomass combustion also offers advantages in reactivity and burnout
behavior. Biomass is more reactive than coal, and biomass ignition
starts at a relatively lower temperature.[4] Low-temperature ignition reduces combustion delay time and establishes
stable flames. A previous study also showed that biomass has high
conversion due to significant volatile matter content.[5]However, biomass combustion potentially causes more
severe operational
problems than coal combustion. Biomass ash contains significant quantities
of ash-forming elements (AFEs) and chlorine. Alkali AFE reactions
with chlorine produce liquid alkali chloride aerosols, which can induce
fouling and corrosion on metal surfaces in commercial boiler convective
pass zones. Silicon and calcium reactions with O2 produce
SiO2 and calcium silicate-type compounds, which can deposit
on commercial boiler water walls and reduce heat transfer efficiency.
Alkali chloride deposition rates are enhanced when they further react
with SiO2 by forming sticky liquid alkali silicate aerosols.Enhanced ash sticking probabilities
due to liquid phase formation
cause several operational problems. Accumulation of ash deposits on
heat exchanger pipe surfaces is known to reduce heat transfer rates
and overall plant efficiencies.[6] The growth
of the ash deposits could stretch to neighboring heat exchanger pipes
and block gas flows.[7] Reduced gas flow
rates create local pressure and temperature buildup, causing damage
to the heat exchanger pipes.[8] The buildup
of local temperatures enhances corrosion and further damages the heat
exchanger pipe surfaces. Sticky biomass ash also forms agglomerations
in fluidized-bed boilers. Agglomerations create channels and reduce
combustion efficiencies by inhibiting bed fluidization.[9] Unplanned plant shutdowns are often mandatory
to facilitate the removal of the accumulated ash deposits.[10] Consequently, frequent shutdowns might adversely
impact plant lifetimes due to thermal stresses.[11]Chemical equilibrium is considered here as a potential
tool to
evaluate AFE phases in biomass combustion via predictions of the fate
and occurrence of the AFEs. The use of chemical equilibrium in biomass
combustion has been widely deployed to enable estimations with the
absence of reaction kinetic parameters.[12−14] Due to lack of reaction
kinetic parameters and, to some extent, mass transfer effects, deviations
between theoretical calculation results and experimental measurement
results are anticipated.[15]This paper
aims to integrate a comprehensive steady-state combustion
model with a chemical equilibrium model to work toward predicting
the fate and occurrence of AFEs in biomass combustion. The validity
of the predictions was evaluated via comparisons of the modeling results
with previous findings and online measurements. The predictions are
expected to lead to recommendations as to whether any examined fuel
is safe to burn and whether additional treatment of the examined fuel
is required to ensure an operationally safe combustion process.
Experimental
Section
The 250 kW entrained-flow combustion unit (Figure ) at the PACT facility
in Sheffield was used
to experimentally investigate the fate and occurrence of various elements
during solid fuel combustion.[16−18] Gas heaters consisting of primary,
secondary, tertiary, and overfire heaters preheat the oxidizer before
it enters the burner and combustion chamber. The oxidizer from the
primary heater outlet is mixed with the solid pulverized fuel fed
via the feeder, which is sent to the burner, with the flows from the
tertiary and overfire heater outlets providing additional oxygen staged
throughout the burner and reactor to encourage complete fuel burnout
and minimize emissions. The scaled swirl burner was provided by GE.
The cylindrical furnace is 4 m in height and has an internal diameter
of 0.9 m. The burner column has eight axial sections, each measuring
0.5 m in length, with a 0.1 m gap made of thick refractories between
adjacent sections. The solid fuel and oxidizer enter at the top of
the burner column in a down-fired arrangement. Temperature profiles
and gas concentration profiles are measured with probes installed
along the burner centerline of the combustion chamber. The combustion
gases leave the burner column at the bottom and then flow upward—the
ash catch pot at the bottom of this section collects large ash particles,
and the cyclone at the top removes smaller particles. The combustion
gases then flow through the heat exchanger. After heat transfer in
the heat exchanger, the combustion gases go through a candle filter
to remove smaller particulates and, potentially, some aerosols before
being released to the atmosphere via the stack. The operating conditions
of the combustor are listed in Table . The same thermal input was used in both cases; due
to the differences in the energy content between the fuels, the fuel
flow rate of the recycled wood was slightly higher than for the white
wood.
Figure 1
Three-dimensional diagram of the PACT facility 250 kW combustion
unit. Reprinted
in part with permission from
ref (19). Copyright
2018 MDPI.
Table 1
Operating Conditions
at the PACT Entrained-Flow
Burner
parameter
value
inlet air flow rate (mol s–1)
2.79
inlet gas temperature (K)
480
inlet white wood flow rate (g s–1)
11.1
inlet recycled wood flow rate (g s–1)
11.7
Three-dimensional diagram of the PACT facility 250 kW combustion
unit. Reprinted
in part with permission from
ref (19). Copyright
2018 MDPI.A small fraction
of the combustion gases leaving the cyclone flows
are sampled for analysis with an online inductively coupled plasma
(ICP) spectrometer; this determines the levels and species of combustion-generated
entrained metal aerosol emissions. The combustion gases are pumped
to the ICP at 200 mL/min with a peristaltic pump and heated in the
heated sample line at 180 °C to avoid moisture loss. The combustion
gases are then cooled in the desolvator and the condenser at 150 and
2 °C, respectively, to trap moisture (Figure ). The dried combustion gases then enter
the plasma flame at ∼6000 K. At this temperature, any previously
formed aerosols are expected to completely vaporize and will be identified
in the optical detector located radially to the torch. The instrument
was calibrated according to the method outlined by Finney et al.[19] This was conducted with solutions at a range
of concentrations for the species investigated herein. The element
standards and blank solution were used to form calibration curves
for each element, where the average lower detection limit was 0.041
mg/m3 and the upper detection limit was 86.9 mg/m3. The correlation coefficients averaged 1.00.
Figure 2
Flow diagram of PACT
online ICP. Reprinted
in part with permission from
ref (19). Copyright
2018 MDPI.
Flow diagram of PACT
online ICP. Reprinted
in part with permission from
ref (19). Copyright
2018 MDPI.The experimental
measurement and the previous literature findings
based on the combustion of white wood and recycled wood in the entrained-flow
combustion unit were used in the evaluation and validation of the
integrated model. The characteristics of both white wood and recycled
wood are listed in Table . The contrasting ash quantities allow the evaluation of the
influence of ash quantities on the fate and occurrence of AFEs.
Table 2
Characterization of Modeled Biomass
analysis
component
white wood
recycled
wood
proximate
analysis (% a.r. mass)
moisture
6.69
5.80
volatile matter
78.10
73.90
fixed carbon
14.51
17.10
ash
0.70
3.20
ultimate analysis (% a.r. mass)
C
48.44
51.90
H
6.34
6.00
O
37.69
41.70
N
0.15
0.40
S
0.02
0.02
Cl
0.01
0.01
AFEs (a.r. mass ppm in
fuel)
Na
62.99
335.44
K
547.59
650.62
Ca
1260.27
6355.36
Mg
216.28
745.53
Si
415.28
6257.57
Al
65.67
925.28
Fe
59.39
1602.47
P
N/A
N/A
Ti
N/A
N/A
Theoretical
Calculations
Two separate models were developed, namely,
the entrained-flow
combustion model (ECM) and the entrained-flow fate and occurrence
model (EFOM), based on compound fate and occurrence in Figure . The ECM modeled the one-dimensional
entrained-flow combustion and generated the profiles of both bulk
temperatures and bulk gas concentrations of major gases, e.g., CH4, CO, CO2, H2, H2O, and N2, in the entrained-flow burner. These profiles were used as
parameters in the EFOM to calculate and generate the profiles of the
fate and occurrence of each AFE in the entrained-flow burner using
chemical equilibrium calculations.
Figure 3
General fate of AFEs and TEs during the
falling of a particle through
a burner. Note that h1, h2, and h3 here are simply
stages of combustion and not discretized heights.
General fate of AFEs and TEs during the
falling of a particle through
a burner. Note that h1, h2, and h3 here are simply
stages of combustion and not discretized heights.The ECM and EFOM were developed within Matlab and ChemApp, respectively.
ChemApp contains digital libraries of thermodynamic properties and
allows calculations of the Gibbs free energies for an enormous number
of chemical compounds. The digital libraries are without user interfaces
and work as a foreign object of a chemical equilibrium function called
by Matlab via a user-written bridging code. This calculation route
provides the same results as that of the well-known equilibrium analysis
software, Factsage, as a standalone program without excessive time
consumption.The ECM conducts simultaneous numerical calculations
of bulk temperatures
and bulk major gas concentration from the top to the bottom of the
burner column. The burner column is discretized into thin slices.
Each thin slice consists of a particle phase and a continuum phase.
In the particle phase, each biomass particle falls from the top to
the bottom of the thin slice. During the fall, each particle loses
mass and volume due to thermal conditions and chemical reactions,
e.g., heat transfer, drying, pyrolysis, and/or heterogeneous reactions.
The loss mass is released to the bulk phase as an addition to the
bulk gas entering the thin slice. Each particle, now with reduced
mass and volume, enters the thin slice below with an updated falling
velocity, size, and set of compositions (proportions of char, wood,
and ash).The heat transfer to the particle phase from the bulk
phase consists
of convective and radiative heat transfer. The change of particle
temperatures due to heat transfer is expressed in eq where Tp, Tb, t, h, σ, ϵ, mp, c, and Sp represent the particle
temperature, bulk temperature, time, particle convective heat transfer
coefficient, Stephen–Boltzmann constant, emissivity, particle
mass, particle heat capacity, and particle surface area, respectively.Wood, as the main constituent of the particle, is initially pyrolyzed
into volatile matter and char according to reaction .[20]Char heterogeneous reactions are expressed in reactions R4 for CO2 gasification, H2O gasification,
and oxidation, respectively.Moisture in the particle evaporates according
to reaction .The reaction and temperature
kinetic equations and parameters for pyrolysis, char heterogeneous
reactions, and drying (reactions R5) are listed in Tables and 4.Here, mwp, mcp, mmp, A, EA, R, pCO, pH, pO, and ρH are the particle wood mass, particle char mass, particle
moisture mass, pre-exponential factor, activation energy, gas constant,
bulk CO2(g) pressure, bulk H2O(g) pressure, bulk O2(g) pressure, and particle moisture
density, respectively.Here, ΔHrx,298K, c, and MW are the chemical reaction
heat at 298 K, specific heat capacity, and molecular weight, respectively.
Table 3
Reaction Kinetic
Equations and Parameters
for Pyrolysis, Char Heterogeneous Reactions, and Drying[21−24]
descriptor
equation
A
EA (J mol–1)
wood pyrolysis
4.4 × 109
1.5 × 105
CO2 gasification
9.1 × 106
1.7 × 105
H2O gasification
1.7 × 103
1.8 × 105
oxidation
5.3 × 105
1.3 × 105
drying
5.1 × 109
88 × 103
Table 4
Temperature Kinetic Equations and
Parameters for Pyrolysis, Char Heterogeneous Reactions, and Drying
descriptor
equation
ΔHrx,298K (J kg–1)
wood pyrolysis
4.2 × 105
CO2 gasification
1.4 ×
107
H2O gasification
1.1 × 106
oxidation
–9.2 × 106
drying
2.4 ×
106
The falling velocity of each particle is calculated via eqs –E14where vp, C, Rep, Vp, ρb, Sprojp, vg, Lcp, vb, and μb are the particle velocity, particle
drag coefficient, particle Reynolds number, particle volume, bulk
density, particle projected area, gas velocity, particle characteristic
length, bulk velocity, and bulk viscosity, respectively.The
values of Vp, Lcp, and Sprojp were determined
according to particle shapes. Visual observation, generating several
microscopic images of the particles, was conducted to investigate
the actual particle shape. The observation revealed that most of the
white wood and recycled wood particles were approximately cylindrical
(Figure ). Wood contains
a significant quantity of cellulose fibers and lignin as a skeleton
holding the structure together. The structure forms parallel alignment
of the fibers, resembling long cylinders.[25] The lengths and diameters of the particles graphically presented
in the images were measured using the computer program ImageJ to obtain
the particle aspect ratios as a function of particle lengths Lp (eq ). The particle lengths were calculated as a function of the
particle sizes measured experimentally via eq . The experimentally measured particle sizes
(DpM) were as if the particles were spherical.
The calculated particle length and diameter distributions are shown
in Figure .
Figure 4
Microscopic images of white wood. L: length of a single
particle;
D: diameter of single particle.
Figure 5
Cumulative
particle length and diameter distribution: blue solid
line, cylindrical radius of white wood; blue dashed line, cylindrical
radius of recycled wood; red solid line, cylindrical length of white
wood; red dashed line, cylindrical length of recycled wood.
Microscopic images of white wood. L: length of a single
particle;
D: diameter of single particle.Cumulative
particle length and diameter distribution: blue solid
line, cylindrical radius of white wood; blue dashed line, cylindrical
radius of recycled wood; red solid line, cylindrical length of white
wood; red dashed line, cylindrical length of recycled wood.The molar mass of each volatile gas, e.g., CH4, CO,
CO2, H2, and H2O, produced from pyrolysis
was solved via a system of linear equations based on the ultimate
analysis data. The mass fraction of each volatile gas was calculated
via eq where x and n are the mass fraction and
molar mass of volatile
gas i, respectively.The equations to calculate
the molar mass rate profiles of gases
both released from the particle phase to the bulk phase and taken
by the particle from the bulk phase to the particle phase (Ḟ) are listed in Table .
Table 5
Molar Rates of Gas Released from and
Taken by the Particlea
py: pyrolysis;
g1: CO2 gasification; g2: H2O gasification;
g3: O2 gasification; dr: drying.The total molar rates of gas i released
from and
taken by an entire particle group of size j, F, are
calculated in eq .The number of particles in a particle size j group, Np(, is calculated from the
particle length and diameter distribution (Figure ).In the continuum phase, the concentrations,
temperatures, and velocities
of the bulk gas are calculated multiple times due to a series of thermodynamic
condition changes.For step 1, the addition of the released
gas to the bulk phase
changes the concentrations, C, and the temperature of the bulk gas as expressed in eqs and E25. The bulk gas velocity remains unchanged (eq ).where AB and Δh represent the burner column
cross-sectional area and burner column thin-slice height, respectively.For step 2, the concentration, temperature, and velocity of the
bulk gas are changed due to homogeneous gas reactions (reactions –R8), taking into account any gas released from the particle
in step 1.The reaction
and temperature kinetic equations and parameters for reactions –R8 are expressed in eqs –E30 and Table .[26,27]
Table 6
Reaction and Temperature Kinetic Equations
and Parameters for Homogeneous Bulk Gas Reactions
reaction
A
EA (J mol–1)
ΔHrx,298K (J mol–1)
(R6)
1.6 × 1010
2 × 105
–5.2 × 105
(R7)
1.3 × 1010
1.8 × 105
–2.8 × 105
(R8)
(3.8 × 1013)T–1
1.7 × 105
–2.4 × 105
The temperature of bulk gas in step 2, Tb(s2), was obtained from the calculations of eqs –E26. The concentration
of the bulk gas in step 2, C, was then calculated via an adjustment of temporary bulk
gas concentration, C, using the ideal gas eq . The velocity of the bulk gas in step 2 was finally calculated
via eq .For step
3, the concentrations, temperature, and velocity of bulk
gas are modified due to heat loss from the burner to the environment.
The heat is consecutively delivered via convection from the bulk gas
to the internal surface of the burner, conduction from the internal
surface to the external surface of the burner, and convection from
the external surface of the burner to the external environment. The
convective heat transfer coefficient for the convection from the bulk
gas to the internal surface of the burner, h, is calculated via eq where Nub, k, and dBint represent the bulk
Nusselt number, bulk
thermal conductivity, and burner internal diameter, respectively.The wall of the burner is a circular structure made of polycrystalline,
high-alumina fibers blended with aluminosilicate fibers and refractory
alumina with a 4:1 alumina-to-silica ratio. The thermal conductivity
of this alloy, k, is calculated via eq .Air is assumed to
be the only gas present in the external environment
and is assumed to be approximately stagnant. Under these assumptions,
the convective heat transfer for the air, h, is estimated to be 10.45 W m–2 K–1. The calculation of the overall burner heat loss coefficient, U, is expressed in eq where dBext is the burner
external diameter. The bulk gas temperature,
concentrations, and velocity in step 3 are calculated in eqs –E38.For step
4, in early modeling, the temperature of the gases introduced
to the burner was insufficient to initiate thermal conversion (to
put it simply, the burner did not ignite). Due to the significant
difference between the burner internal diameter and the diameter of
the gas introducer at the top of the burner, experimental observations
showed that bulk gas with a high temperature was recirculated to the
top of the burner and the gas was heated as it was introduced to the
burner. This recirculation established steady-state combustion. To
simulate this phenomenon and initiate ignition, a small amount of
heat (essentially enough to raise the temperature to the ignition
point) was “loaned” to the bulk gas at the uppermost
section of the burner to initiate ignition in the model. Heat was
loaned gradually to the bulk gas until 0.1 m from the top of the burner
(eq ).The
loaned heat was equally distributed in each individual thin
slice (PloanΔ).
The loaned heat, Ploan, was equally gradually
removed in each individual subsequent thin slice, PremoveΔ, once the thermal conversion
was completed. Fg(in), Tg(in), and Tign are the inlet
gas flow rate, inlet gas temperature, and ignition temperature set
as the starting point of biomass thermal conversion, respectively.
The temperature of bulk gas in step 4 was obtained by solving Tb(s4) in either eq or eq .The concentration and velocity of bulk gas in step 4 (eqs and E43) and Tb(s4) were used as the
final properties of bulk gas leaving the thin slice (C, vb(, and Tb().The EFOM
separately calculated the fate and occurrence of the AFEs
in both the particle phase and bulk phase with the profiles of concentrations
(C), temperatures (Tb), and velocities (vb) of the major gases (as discussed above, CH4, CO, CO2, H2, H2O, and N2) as fixed
quantities.As discussed above, the pyrolysis of a given mass
of wood led to
the production of a number of AFEs, which were then included in the
equilibrium calculations.Reaction is a
simplification of the decomposition since AFEs are originally not
in the form of pure elements.[28] The initial
occurrence of each AFE depends on the AFE cellular locations and interactions
with the other AFEs and the organic constituents. The simplification
ignores the decomposition heat of the inorganic constituents; however,
the decomposition heat value is significantly less than the heat transferred
to the particle via oxidation, convection, and radiation. A detailed
validation of this assumption has been conducted elsewhere, and it
led to a difference in temperature for the particles at <10 K,
which was deemed acceptable.[29]The
AFEs formed in reaction were introduced to the chemical equilibrium calculation to
obtain the ash-forming compounds (AFCs) formed at Tb(. All AFCs that, after the equilibrium
calculation, were found to be solids or liquids remained within the
particle phase, and all gaseous AFCs that were formed left for the
continuum phase.The AFC concentrations in the continuum (i.e.,
gas plus any aerosols
formed) phase similarly change in a series of steps during each time
step.For step 1, the addition of the released gaseous AFCs
(GAFC) to
the continuum phase changes the concentrations of bulk AFCs (eq ).The concentrations of bulk solid and liquid aerosols (SAFC and
LAFC) entering the thin slice from above remained unchanged (eqs and E46).For step 2, the concentrations of bulk ash-forming elements
in
step 1 were used as the input to the chemical equilibrium calculation
at Tb( to obtain the
concentrations of liquid and solid aerosols (i.e., AFCs), e.g., CGAFCb(s2), CLAFCb(s2), and CSAFCb(s2). Here, the concentrations
of aerosols can change; this is the primary step where they are formed.For step 3, the concentrations of gaseous AFCs were adjusted using eq to ensure that the
pressure remained at 1 bar; the total quantities of solid and liquid
aerosols do not change from step 2 to step 3 (eqs and E49).where pb is the bulk pressure.
Results and Discussion
Entrained-Flow
Combustion Model
The temperature and
dry O2(g) molar percentage profiles measured in the burner
combusting white wood with air were compared with the profiles generated
with ECM (Figure ).
The comparison shows that the ECM profile results were well validated
with the measured profiles. However, the peak temperature (±0.25
m from burner top) shown in the ECM bulk temperature profile was unable
to be validated. The combustion occurred within 0.5 m from the burner
top. The feed introducer diameter is far shorter than the burner internal
diameter. When both fuel and air entered the burner, their combined
velocity was reduced due to cross-sectional area expansion. The slower
flow promoted both fuel and air to move away from the burner centerline.
Due to less fuel at the burner centerline, the combustion was thought
to occur primarily near burner walls within the burner’s uppermost
section, causing lower centerline temperatures than near-wall temperatures.
The occurrence of the oxidation reactions near the burner wall distributed
all the O2 to that location and left the burner centerline
free of O2(g). Since ECM works as a one-dimensional model,
not accounting radial thermal distribution, and the temperature probes
were installed to measure several positions within the burner centerline,
the discrepancy between the modeled temperature profiles and the measured
temperature profiles are expected within 0.5 m from the burner top.
Figure 6
Profiles
of (a) bulk temperature and (b) bulk O2(g) molar
fraction: solid lines, ECM; open circles, experiment at the PACT facility.
Profiles
of (a) bulk temperature and (b) bulk O2(g) molar
fraction: solid lines, ECM; open circles, experiment at the PACT facility.
EFOM: Alkali Metals (Figures 7 and 8)
Figures and 8 present the fate and occurrence of both sodium
and potassium along
the burner as the bulk temperatures change. Each figure exhibits different
behaviors between the profiles before the peak temperature (0.2 m)
and after the peak temperature. The occurrence profiles were simpler
after the peak temperature since only a relatively small number of
compounds exist within a broad height range. In addition, the evaluation
and comparison of the theoretical predictions with experimental measurements
were easier since the calculated and measured temperatures for the
continuum phase were similar after the peak in temperature. The occurrence
profiles before peak temperature, however, were difficult to evaluate
due to significant changes in composition within a small number of
slices. Nevertheless, the actual quantities of trace elements released
are small because the temperatures before the peak temperature are
low so that the biomass does not release any metals to the bulk phase
until the temperature is close to the peak temperature. This also
applies to the other elements.
Figure 7
Sodium phase profile in (a) white wood
combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; sodium occurrence profile in (c) white wood
combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
Figure 8
Potassium
phase profile in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; potassium occurrence profile in (c) white
wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
Sodium phase profile in (a) white wood
combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; sodium occurrence profile in (c) white wood
combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.Potassium
phase profile in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; potassium occurrence profile in (c) white
wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.Figure shows that
once the peak temperatures were achieved (0.2 m), all the alkali metals
were devolatilized from the particles since both sodium and potassium
were very volatile at relatively low temperatures. The alkali metals
were released mostly as alkali metal hydroxides and chlorides (KOH(g), NaOH(g), KCl(g), and NaCl(g)) and as small quantities of K(g) and Na(g) shortly before the bulk temperature profiles reached the peak temperature,
although the majority of the metals were present as hydroxides owing
to reactions with moisture (reactions –R13).[30−32] It is reasonable to use an equilibrium model here since reactions and R13 are frequently experimentally found to be in equilibrium
due to instantaneous forward and backward reaction rates at high temperatures.[33]Above and
toward 2000 K, alkali metal hydroxides have a tendency
to decompose back into pure elements due to extreme heat as the occurrence
profiles of Na(g) and K(g) spike at the peak
temperature.[34]Below 0.5 m, alkali
aluminum silicates (NaAlSi3O8(s) and KAlSi2O6(s)) were formed in
recycled wood combustion. With the absence of alkali aluminum silicates
in white wood combustion, the difference in occurrence indicates that
the larger amount of alkali metals released from recycled wood was
sufficient to undergo a series of complex reactions with silicon and
aluminum oxides to form NaAlSi3O8(s) and KAlSi2O6(s).[35] NaAlSi3O8(s) has frequently been found in the fly ash
of combustion of solid fuel with high sodium content.[36] In a commercial boiler, KAlSi2O6(s) has frequently been found in the refractory materials growing on
the surface of superheaters along with other alkali aluminum silicates,
e.g., NaAlSi3O8(s) and KAlSiO4(s).[37] The reaction of alkali metals with
silicon and aluminum oxides might have occurred via aerosol collisions
prior to deposition on superheater surfaces and, subsequently, within
the refractory materials (reaction ).[38]Alkali chlorides
(NaCl(g) and KCl(g)) were
both formed with small proportions in both white wood and recycled
wood combustion. The devolatilized alkali metals may have reacted
with chlorine once released from the particle phase to alkali chlorides.[39] The alkali chlorides might have also reacted
with the volatilized sulfur (SO2(g)) to form a minor amount
of alkali sulfates (reactions and R16). However, both reactions and R16 are significantly slow and require adequate reaction
times for high conversion, e.g., during the growth of the fouling
scale initiated by alkali chloride layers.[40]Calcium
fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; calcium bulk occurrence profiles in (c)
white wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P:
particle; G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.Magnesium
fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; magnesium species present in (c) white wood
combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
EFOM: Alkaline Earth Metals (Figures and 10)
The alkaline
earth metals were unexpectedly very volatile and released
almost completely (±0.1 m) from the particle phase in white wood
combustion, probably due to less alkaline earth metal quantities in
white than in recycled wood.[41] When released,
the alkaline earth metals, primarily calcium, exhibited high tendencies
to react with silicon to form solid alkaline earth metal oxide aerosols.[42]Ca2SiO4(s) was formed
with the highest proportion as the result of calcium oxide reaction
with silicon oxide in white wood combustion (reaction ). The reaction to form Ca2SiO4(s) is favored at temperatures from 1143 to 1873 K.[43,44]Despite
a substantial amount of carbon in the form of CO2 in the
continuum phase, the formation of CaCO3(s) did
not occur due to the very high temperatures, and a small amount of
Ca(OH)2(g) was formed in white wood combustion.[45,46]Calcium formed a significant number of silicate aerosols with
magnesium,
aluminum, and silicon in the combustion of recycled wood. For white
wood, the quantity of calcium was much higher than the quantity of
silicon, while recycled wood featured similar quantities of both elements.
The formation of CaSiO3(s) is favored when the CaO-to-SiO2 ratio is at around 1.[47] CaSiO3(s) is also formed via Ca2SiO4(s)’s
further reaction with SiO2(s) (reaction ).[48]CaMgSi2O6(s) is formed in a lower proportion
but still has unclear mechanisms of formation. Despite this, CaMgSi2O6(s) was evidently found in fir wood combustion
fly ash.[49]The occurrence of magnesium
in white wood combustion was primarily
Mg(OH)2(g) and MgO(s). Magnesium is mainly devolatilized
(± 0.1 m) as Mg(OH)2(g). The formation of Mg(OH)2(g) at around the peak temperature (0.1–0.3 m) was
likely due to magnesium’s reaction with moisture at a very
high temperature.[50] As the temperature
gradually decreases (>0.3 m), Mg(OH)2(g) decomposed
into
MgO(g) (reaction ).[51]In recycled wood combustion,
the occurrence of magnesium was dominated
by Ca–Mg silicates. Once released from the particle phase,
magnesium formed CaMgSi2O6(s). CaMgSi2O6(s) was converted to Ca2MgSi2O7(s) at around the peak temperature (0.19 m) and regained its
initial form when the bulk temperature decreased (0.3 m) due to the
stability of CaMgSi2O6(s) at low temperatures.[52]The alkaline earth metals were left in
the particle phase at a
significant proportion at around 20 and 10% of the total initial quantity
of calcium and magnesium, respectively, in recycled wood combustion.
High quantities of alkaline earth metals in the solid fuel might have
increased the retention of the alkaline earth metals in the particle
phase due to formation of complex silicates because of reactions with
O2 penetrating during char oxidation. CaSiO3(s) might have been formed via calcium reactions with silicon and O2.[53] The selectivity toward CaSiO3(s) formation may have also been suppressed due to the interference
of magnesium and aluminum, forming the other silicates, e.g., Ca3MgSi2O8(s) and Ca2Al2SiO7(s).[54,55]Silicon fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; silicon bulk occurrence profiles in (c)
white wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P:
particle; G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
EFOM: Silicon (Figure )
The release of silicon (±0.1 m) exhibited
similar behavior to the release of calcium in both white wood and
recycled wood combustion. This similarity was probably due to silicon
affinity with calcium in forming calcium silicates as previously shown
in Figure . Both silicon
and calcium were released from the particle phase in the forms of
Ca2SiO4(s) and CaSiO3(s) in the combustion
of white wood and recycled wood, respectively.
Figure 9
Calcium
fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; calcium bulk occurrence profiles in (c)
white wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P:
particle; G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
When compared
to white wood combustion, the very distinctive behavior of silicon
in recycled wood combustion was the formation of a substantial fraction
of liquid compounds at around the peak temperature (0.19–0.3
m). The combustion of recycled wood might have promoted the formation
of SiO2(l) since recycled wood contains a greater quantity
of silicon than white wood. The formation of SiO2(l) has
been previously described as SiO2(g) supersaturation.[56] Silicon was likely volatilized as SiO(g), subsequently reacting with O2(g) (reaction ). SiO2(g) might
have also been formed via SiO(g) heterogeneous nucleation
with CO2(g) (reaction ).In the case of combustion
of recycled wood, the saturation of SiO2(g) might have
been established via the breakdown of CaSiO3(s) in the
very hot environment at around the peak temperature
into other calcium silicate compounds and SiO2(g). The
saturation of SiO2(g) may have led to the formation of
calcium silicates when exposed to calcium compounds and, further,
to the nucleation SiO2(g) into SiO2(l) (reaction ).SiO2(l) later
diminishes, and CaSiO3(s) again
became the dominant species below 2000 K. A tiny quantity of CaSiTiO5(l) was also found and has previously been found to be present
in such systems.[57]The remaining
silicon left in the particle phase in recycled wood
exhibited a similar occurrence profile to the remaining calcium (Figure ). Silicon’s
strong affinity with calcium promoted the formation of calcium silicate
compounds, e.g., CaSiO3(s), Ca3MgSi2O8(s), and Ca2Al2SiO7(s).Aluminum fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion
and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; aluminum bulk occurrence profiles in (c)
white wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P:
particle; G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
EFOM: Aluminum (Figure )
Aluminum was entirely released (±0.1 m) from
the particle phase in white wood combustion, while almost 20% of the
total initial aluminum remains in the particle phase in recycled wood
combustion. The remaining aluminum in recycled wood combustion indicated
aluminum affinity with the remaining silicon and calcium in forming
aluminosilicate compounds.In white wood combustion, aluminum
was released in significant quantities as AlO(g). At around
the peak temperature, aluminum was in the form of OAlOH(g) and Ca2Al2SiO7(s). OAlOH(g) was formed via the AlO(g) reaction with moisture (reaction ).At bulk temperatures close to the peak temperature, OAlOH(g) was found to be more prevalent, and at lower temperatures,
the strong
interactions of calcium and silicon with aluminum preferentially formed
compounds such as Ca2Al2SiO7(s).
Since recycled wood contains more AFEs, the formation of CaAl2Si2O8(s) was preferred in this case.
CaAl2Si2O8(s) might have been formed
via further reaction of Ca2Al2SiO7(s) with oxidized silicon and aluminum (reaction ).[58]As bulk
temperatures dropped (0.28–0.45 m) in white wood
combustion, MgAl2O4(s) was formed along with
MgO(s) (Figure c). The coexistence of MgAl2O4(s) and
MgO(s) may have been due to their stability in forming
a solid solution at temperatures above 1773 K.[59] When approaching the end of step 3 (0.45–0.56 m),
the bulk temperatures were low enough to allow MgAl2O4(s) decomposition and CaAl2O4(s) formation
via nucleation.[60]
Figure 10
Magnesium
fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; magnesium species present in (c) white wood
combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
At around 0.5 m
from the top of the burner in recycled wood combustion,
low bulk temperatures reduced the proportions of CaAl2Si2O8(s) and alkali aluminosilicates, e.g., KAlSi2O6(s) and NaAlSi3O8(s). The
selectivity toward alkali aluminosilicate formation was probably due
to higher silicon and alkali metal quantities in recycled wood than
in white wood.In the bottom ash in recycled wood combustion,
aluminum remains
as Ca2Al2SiO7 (s). Although
the mechanism of Ca2Al2SiO7(s) formation
in the bottom ash is still unclear, the formation might have occurred
via calcium, silicon, and aluminum chemical interactions enhanced
with the larger quantities of such elements in recycled wood than
in white wood.Iron fate profiles in (a) white wood
combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; iron bulk occurrence profiles in (c) white
wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
EFOM: Iron (Figure )
The entirety of the iron was released (±0.1
m) from the particle phases in both white wood and recycled wood combustion.
Iron might have been devolatilized in to the particle phase as Fe(g). However, the primarily form of iron during the release
was Fe(OH)2(g) due to Fe(g) reaction with moisture
(reaction ).[61] The remaining unreacted Fe(g) was
left along with FeO(g) in small quantities. It was also
possible that FeO(g) could react with moisture to form
Fe(OH)2.At peak
temperatures
(± 0.2 m), the proportion of Fe(OH)2(g) decreased
as the occurrence partition of Fe(g) and FeO(g) increased. Very high temperatures might have promoted Fe(OH)2(g) decomposition via the reverse reaction of R25. As bulk
temperatures gradually decreased (>0.2 m), the proportion of Fe(OH)2(g) increased and the quantities of Fe(g), and
FeO(g) decreased to zero.However, while the Fe(OH)2(g) proportion increased and
remained stable (>0.2 m) in white wood combustion, Fe(OH)2(g) was converted to Fe3O4(l) (0.35–0.53
m) in recycled wood combustion (reaction ).[62]The conversion
of Fe(OH)2(g) to Fe3O4(l) is known
as the Schikorr reaction and might have been
due to a greater quantity of iron in the recycled wood than in the
white wood. Fe3O4(l) was turned into Fe3O4(s) (>0.52 m) when bulk temperatures dropped
below 1870 K.[63]
ICP Measurement and Validation
The concentrations of
AFEs leaving the burner were compared with the AFE concentrations
measured using ICP. This would be expected to pick up species in both
the gas and aerosol phases. Figure shows the comparison for white wood combustion and
shows that the AFE concentrations in uncooled combustion gases are
somewhat validated by the ICP measurement results. However, certain
limitations promote disagreement between the measurement and the model
results. The comparison shows reasonable agreement for alkali metals
but higher estimated concentrations for alkaline-earth metals, silicon,
aluminum, and iron from the model.
Figure 14
Densities of AFEs leaving the burner
in white wood combustion.
Error bar: measurement sensitivity range.
Densities of AFEs leaving the burner
in white wood combustion.
Error bar: measurement sensitivity range.Compared with the alkaline-earth metals, the alkali metals are
extremely volatile. As seen in Figures a and 8a, no alkali metals remain
in the particles. Since the fate and occurrence calculations are based
on the minimization of the Gibbs free energy change on which not only
temperatures and pressures but also chemical compositions have an
effect, the significantly lower alkali metal molar quantities might
not permit the formation of alkali aluminosilicates as seen in Figures c and 8c. Instead, the released silicone and aluminum are prone to
form calcium aluminosilicates with calcium, e.g., Ca2SiO4(s), as seen in Figures c and 12c. Since Fe3O4(s) does not exist in white wood combustion (Figure ), Fe3O4(s) might be formed via the Schikorr reaction at lower
bulk temperatures at the lower reaches of the burner.
Figure 12
Aluminum fate profiles in (a) white wood combustion
and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; aluminum bulk occurrence profiles in (c)
white wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P:
particle; G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
Figure 13
Iron fate profiles in (a) white wood
combustion and (b) recycled
wood combustion with air; iron bulk occurrence profiles in (c) white
wood combustion and (d) recycled wood combustion with air. P: particle;
G: gas; LA: liquid aerosol; SA: solid aerosol; Tb: bulk temperature.
Unlike
the released alkali metal species, which are gaseous, the
calcium aluminosilicates are solid aerosols, which have the tendency
to form larger-size solid aerosols at relatively low temperatures.
The formation of larger-size solid aerosols was promoted via aerosol
coagulation. Some compounds might form large growing aerosol particles
via nucleation and condensation or recondense on the existing ash
particles. SiO2(s), for instance, condenses on the surface
of growing Ca2SiO4(s) aerosols. The condensation
could promote a solid-state reaction converting Ca2SiO4(s) into CaSiO3(s) (reaction ). The nucleated aerosol particle sizes
could further increase via aerosol particles coagulation with other
aerosol particles or residual particles.Large aerosol
sizes reduce aerosol selectivity to escape the burner
and enhance aerosol probability to be retained at burner bottom. The
formation of large particles containing Si, Al, Fe, and Mg via coagulation,
aerosol growth, or condensation on ash (neither of which are accounted
in the model and would be observed by ICP) is likely the reason for
the discrepancy between the modeled results and the results from the
ICP.AFEs are distributed originally into several forms in wood,
namely,
water-soluble salts, organically associated metal ions, included minerals,
and excluded minerals. Water-soluble salts are mostly AFE sulfates,
chlorides, and phosphates dissolved in pore moisture. Some AFEs are
also ionically bonded with organics. AFE interactions among themselves
also allow formation of various minerals either distributed within
organic matrices or excluded from organic matrices entirely. As the
AFE with one of the highest concentrations in wood, calcium and silicon
are often trapped as (Ca,Mn)C2O4·2H2O(s) and SiO2(s) within organic matrices. SiO2(s) along with other minerals, e.g., CaAl2Si2O8(s), Al2Si2O5(OH)4(s), etc., is also clumped as minerals excluded from
organic matrices.[28] AFEs in both excluded
and included minerals are more likely to be retained in residual particles
collected at the bottom of the burner since minerals have worse volatilization
behavior than water-soluble salts and organics, although equilibrium-based
models such as those developed here cannot account for such kinetic
limitations.
Concluding Remarks
The integrated
ECM and EFOM were designed to predict and evaluate
the fate and partition of ash-forming elements in solid fuel combustion.
The predicted fate and partition of each ash-forming element were
qualitatively compared with experimental results. The comparison exhibited
that the experimental findings have some areas of agreement with the
modeled results. However, some elements (Fe, Mg, Ca, and Al) were
not validated well by experimental measurements. The predicted concentrations
of several AFEs overestimated the ICP readings due to the choice of
an equilibrium-based model and the likelihood that aerosols forming
would in reality recondense on ash particles and hence be removed
from the bulk phase, which was measured by the ICP.The integration
of the combustion and equilibrium models developed
here appears to be reliable yet still requires improvement, particularly
to consider the kinetics of ash-forming element release, which are
treated crudely here. Such improvement will require the mathematical
development of nucleation and coagulation calculations and comprehensive
measurements of the initial forms of the ash-forming elements together
with kinetic expressions for their production.